all-1717273418 Flashcards
what are the 4 main aspects of migration and globalisation?
- feminisation of migration
- globalisation of the gender division of labour : female migrants are given
stereotyped roles as carers or providers of sexual services - migrant identities - ERIKSEN 2007 - transnational identities
- glbalisation causes the back and forth movement between cultures so they dont
see themselves as belonging to one - they develop TN culture
- modern tech means we can do this w out travel
- migration and policies
- policies exist to control migration these policies have been linked to
aanti-terrorism polcies - assimilation - encouageing migrants to intergrate
- multiculturalism - accepts migrants desire to retain seperate cultural
identity but in practice it is limited and superficial like food (shallow
diversity) - divided w/c assimilationist ideas may encourage blaming of unemployment on
migrants - differentiation
Cohen (2006) says there’s class differences between migrants. distinguishes
between :
> Citizens (full rights, e.g. voting rights)
> Denizens (privileged foreign nationals, e.g. billionaire ‘oligarchs’)
> Helots (disposable labour power found in unskilled, poorly paid work. they
include illegally trafficked workers)
outline difference between push and pull factor
‘PUSH’ factors : e.g. unemployment and economic recession
‘PULL’ factors : e.g. higher wages or better opportunities
sociological explanations on the ageing population
PHILLIPSON (MARXIST):
The old are of no use to capitalism because they are no longer productive and an
economically dependent group, adding to the dependency ratio.
HUNT (POSTMODERNIST):
We can choose our identity no matter what our age is: our age no longer
determines who we are. As a result of this, the elderly become a market for body
maintenance and rejuvenation services and goods, such as cosmetic surgery, gym
membership and anti-ageing products.
reasons for ageing population
The average age in the UK isincreasing because of:
- Increased life expectancy
- Low infant mortality rate
- Declining fertility
what are the effects of an ageing population
1)strain on public service
(older people consume more health and social services)
2)more one person pensioner households
(now accts for 1/7 households)
3)rising dependency ratio
(the non-working need to be provided for by those of working age)
4)agism
(age statuses are socially constructed and old age is often constructed as
negitive)
impact of declining birth rate
- more women can go into work which means there are more dual earner couples
- fewer children reduces the ‘burden of dependency’ on the working population
- effect on public services : there are fewer schools and child health services
needed. less needs to be spent on maternity and paternity leave.
whareasons for the decline in birth rate
1) CHANGES IN POSITION OF WOMEN - increased educational oppourtunities, more
women in paid work, change in attitude in family life, wider access to abortion
and contraception
2)FALL IN INFANT MORTALITY RATE - improved housing, sanitation, nutrition,
knowledge or hygiene, improved tech, antibiotics
3)CHILDREN AS AN ECONOMIC LIABILITY - laws banning child labour + compulsary
education = children remain economically dependant for longer, social norms of
childrens rights changed making them more spenny
4)CHILD CENTREDNESS - childhood is a socially constructed unique stage of life,
focus is changed to quality not quantity meaning they have fewer yutes but more
attention on each
define total fertility rate
number of births per 1000 of population per year
domestic violence : materialist explanation
COUPLES
- lack of resources : Wilkinson + Pickett (2010) say the result of stress on
family caused by social inequality. families that lack resources means more
stress and this increases the risk of DV - Marxist feminists like Ansley say that male workers exploited at work take out
frustration on wives.
BUT:
- fails to explain why not all male workers do DV
dobash and dobash - radical feminist view on dv
COUPLES
- Dobash + Dobash : violence is triggered when husbands felt their authority was
being challenged. they conclude that marriage legitimises violence by giving
power to men.
BUT:
- doesn’t explain violence against men or by women against husbands, kids and
lesbian partners.
domestic violence : radical feminist explanation
COUPLES
men opress women mainly through the family
DV enables men to control women so it’s inevitable in patriarchal society
- men also dominate the state. this is why police and courts fail to take DV
seriously. - Dobash + Dobash : violence is triggered when husbands felt their authority
was being challenged. they conclude that marriage legitimises violence by giving
power to men.
BUT:
- doesn’t explain violence against men or by women against husbands, kids and
lesbian partners.
statistics on dv
COUPLES
1 in 6 men expirince it
1 in 4 women expirience it
what are the two explanations for inequalities in decision making between
couples?
COUPLES
MATERIAL
> men have more power bc they earn more
> women are more economically dependent so have less say
CULTURAL
> feminists say gender role socialisation in patriarchal society instils the
idea that men are decision makers.
according to pahl and voglers what wys is money split between couples
COUPLES
Pahl + Vogler (1993):
- allowance system : men work and give their non-working wives an allowance.
they budget this to meet the family’s needs. - pooling : partners work and have joint responsibility for spending (e.g. joint
bank accounts) - there’s a big increase in pooling but men still tend to make major decisions.
link between decision making and paid work
COUPLES
- men have a greater control and say over decisions because they earn more.
Pahl + Vogler (1993):
- allowance system : men work and give their non-working wives an allowance.
they budget this to meet the family’s needs. - pooling : partners work and have joint responsibility for spending (e.g. joint
bank accounts) - there’s a big increase in pooling but men still tend to make major decisions.
cultural explanation of the gender division of labour COUPLES
- patriarchal norms shape gender roles. women perform more domestic work because
that’s what society expects and has socialised them to do. - Kan (2001) : younger men do more domestic work showing that its due to gender
norms as younger generations break down these norms
material explanation of the gender division of labour
COUPLES
- women earn less than men, so it’s economically rational for them to do more
domestic labour - Ramos (2003) : where the woman is the FT breadwinner and the man is
unemployed, they do equal amounts of domestic work
list ways in which couples are considered to be becoming more equal or not
COUPLES
for
- increase in same sex couples
- MOP
agasinst
- responbility for children
- triple shift + dual burden
more equality in couples : same-sex couples and gender scripts
COUPLES
- radical feminists argue that heterosexual relationships are inevitably
patriarchal and unequal, even when both are in paid work. this contrasts w
same-sex relationships. - lesbian couples : don’t link gender to household tasks. they’re more open to
negotiation and therefore more equal
more equality in couples : responsibility for ‘quality time’
COUPLES
- women take responsibility for managing the family’s quality time
- leads to what Dunscombe and Marsden call the ‘triple shift’
more equality in couples : responsibility for children
COUPLES
- fathers help with specific tasks but mum takes responsibility for the child’s
well-being - Dex + Ward : only 1% of fathers took the main responsibility for caring for a
sick child
feminist perspective on if there is more equality in couples
COUPLES
NO
- dual burden : paid + domestic work
- triple shift : emotion work, paid work + domestic work
- responsible for children
what are the 2 types of conjugal roles according to Bott
COUPLES
MOP VIEW : Bott (1957)
- established 2 types of conjugal roles:
1) segregated : sharp division of labour between male BW and female HM. spend
leisure time separately
2) joint : couples share domestic tasks and leisure time.
is domestic division of labour equal : symmetrical family
MOP
COUPLES
Young and Willmott studied segregated conjugal roles in wc families in Bethnal
Green during the 1950s.
MOP VIEW : Young + Willmott ( 1973)
- see a long-term trend towards joint conjugal roles and the symmetrical family.
-roles are more equal and similar:
-more women go out to work
- men help w domestic tasks
caused by
- improved tech(labour saving devices)
- changes in womens position
is domestic division of labour equal : Feminist perspective
COUPLES
- reject the MOP view because the family is still patriarchal women still do
most of the housework and childcare
ANN OAKLEY - tasks which men do a few and far between while also being easier
in nature
- she found husbands are more likely to work in childcare than housework as it
is more pleasing - Oakley (1974) : no evidence of symmetry in domestic labour. men’s role has
been exaggerated. ‘helping’ could just mean ironing their own shirts once a
week.
- Oakley (1974) : no evidence of symmetry in domestic labour. men’s role has
domestic division of labour : functionalist view
COUPLES
Parsons (1995)
- two roles that are based on biological differences. they benefit both spouses,
their children and wider society.
1) expressive : female nurturer and carer.
2) instrumental : male breadwinner, financially responsible
- the New Right agree with this.
social policy
outline employment protection act
1975 - EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION ACT
-prior women had maternity leave buy were often sacked
how does this affect the family?
- maternity pay increases for more children
- increased sizes of families
pro nuclear family?
- underminded gender roles
general maternity + paternity laws
SOCIAL POLICY
men are only entitled to up to 2 weeks
women could go up to 39 weeks or 52 weeks unpaid
social policy
outline the civil partnership act
2004 - CIVIL PARTNERSHIP ACT
-gave gay people same rights as those in civil marriage such as exemption on
inheretence tax pension ebniofits e.t.c
how does this affect the family?
- increase in legally recognised same-sex couples
- same-sex couples became more visible
pro nuclear family?
- undermines
social policy
outline the 1969 divorce act
1969 - DIVORCE ACT
prior one partner had to prove the other was ‘at fault’ to gain divorce
how does this affect the family?
- rapid increase in divorce
- increase in lone-parent + step family
pro nuclear family?
- undermined
how does this affect the family
SOCIAL POLICY
1969 - DIVORCE ACT
-prior one partner had to prove the other was ‘at fault’ to gain divorce
how does this affect the family?
- rapid increase in divorce
- increase in lone-parent + step family
pro nuclear family?
- undermined
1975 - EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION ACT
-prior women had maternity leave buy were often sacked
how does this affect the family?
- maternity pay increases for more children
- increased sizes of families
pro nuclear family?
- underminded gender roles
1974 - CHILD BENIFITS ACT
how does this affect the family?
- increase in family size
- increase in lone-parent families
pro nuclear family?
undermined
1988 - CHANGE TO CHILD BENINIFTS
-this is the abolisition of 50p extra lone parents
how does this affect the family?
- reduction in lone parent families
pro nuclear family?
- supported
2004 - CIVIL PARTNERSHIP ACT
-gave gay people same rights as those in civil marriage such as exemption on
inheretence tax pension ebniofits e.t.c
how does this affect the family?
- increase in legally recognised same-sex couples
- same-sex couples became more visible
pro nuclear family?
- undermines
2005 - ADOPITON ACT
how does this affect the family?
- increase in same - sex families
pro nuclear family?
- undermined
2013- MEANS TESTED CHILD BENIFITS
how does this affect the family?
- no child benifits for people who earn over 60k
- possible reduction in larger familes
pro nuclear family?
- neutral
2013 - PATERNITY ACT +
2015 - SHARED PARENTAL LEAVE
how does this affect the family?
- greater eqality between gender roles
- increased no. of male role models
pro nuclear family?
- undermines tradional gender roles
2017 - 2 CHILD TAX CREDIT POLICY
- no extra benifit after 2nd child
- decrease in larger families
general definition for social policy
SOCIAL POLICY
plans and actions of state agencies such as health and social services and the
welfare system or other bodies.
reasons for the changes in patterns of lone parent families
CHANGING PATTERNS IN FAMILY
-increase in lone parent families lead to this when they find bf or gf
-
statistic of step families
CHANGING PATTERNS IN FAMILY
10% of all families
reasons for changes in lone parent families + new right opinion
CHANGING PATTERNS IN FAMILY
-decline stigma
-increased divorce
charles murray-
caused by overgenerous welfare causing welfare dependency
reasons for change in childbearing
CHANGING PATTERNS IN FAMILY
there is a increase in birth outside marriage due to decline in stigma and
increase cohabitation
• later age for women having children and them having smaller famalies is due to
women’s change in position. as they carry out education for longer and also
childcenterdness wanna focus more on heir children and children costs for
bringing them up are increasing
social policies introduced over gay rights
CHANGING PATTERNS IN FAMILY
2004 civil right patnership that sex couples have similar legal rights such as
pensions , inheritance , properties
reasons for increase number of cohabitation
CHANGING PATTERNS IN FAMILY
• decline in stigma in 1989 44% people agreed with sex outside marriage but now
raised to 65%
• young people are more likely to accept cohabitation
• increased career opportunities women need less financial security
• young people with no religion are more likely to