Alexander II Reforms Flashcards
In what years were the military reforms and who were they led by?
1874-1875 and was led by Dmitry Milyutin
What were the problems with the military?
- poorly trained serfs
- high ranks could be bought and sold without experience
- Crimean war saw loss of 400,000
- low moral
- largest army in the world (1.5 million)
How did Milyutin plan to improve the military?
- smaller
- more efficient
- less expensive
- more professional
What were the changes made?
- Conscription compulsory for all from the age of 21 and length of service reduced from 25 years to 15 (6 yrs in army and 9 in reserves)
- Punishments less severe and military colonies are abolished
- Better medical care and weaponry (iron-clad steamships)
- Develop railways and Military colleges set up train officers (not only nobles) so had mass army education campaign in 1870s and 1890s
What were the impacts?
- Opposition from nobility
- Army was cheaper and well trained
- Majority of officers still aristocrats
- Struggled to beat Turkey in 1877-78
- Problems with supply continued
- Defeated by Japan 1904-05
When were the education reforms and who were they led by?
1863-1864 and Alexander Golovnin (Minister of education 1862-1867). Emancipation saw a need for this as they needed basic literacy to run business
What were the reforms?
- Primary and secondary extended with ‘modern school’ established at secondary level for those who didn’t want traditional education offered in gimnaziya
- Open to all class, sex (allow women to attend non-vocational education in 1870)
- Non-fee paying could go to uni
- 1856=8000 primary schools compared to 1880=23000
- Unis could govern themselves and appoint staff
- Children in primary from 400,000 to 1 million and by 1870s 10000 were at university compared to 3600
What were the problems with the education reforms?
- Gov controlled by gov
- Led to more radical thinkers who challenged the regime
- People could read the radical publications
When were the censorship forms and what was censorship like before the reforms?
1858 - 1870 and under Nicholas II censorship was very very strict on all books, newspapers had to be approved and many (as more educated) people were extremely unhappy
What were the reforms?
1863 - rules started to relax with ‘liberalisation’
1865 - books no approval and newspapers could include editorials and comment of government policies
- Foreign publications could be sold
- newspapers could be fined but only after publishing
What were the impacts of censorship reforms?
- books published in 1864= 1836 and 1894 = 10691 but still a degree of censorship
- rise in critical writings - retighten government control in 1870s
- new ideas from abroad circulated in Russia
What were the problems with the local government?
- emancipation abolished the rights of landowners over the local population leaving a void
- landowners had been responsible for law and order as well as building roads, building bridges etc
- this meant that a new form of government was needed to take these responsibilities
What were the local government reforms?
- from 1864-1870
- elected local councils in the countryside called the zemstva which were then set up in towns and called dumas in 1870
- zemstva had power over public services like roads, schools, jails and public health but also helped the poor in hard times
- however, they had no control over local taxes
- chosen by electoral colleges (individual vote for others who then cats votes on behalf)
What was the impact of the local government reforms?
- many hoped it would be a huge step towards a National Assembly (didn’t happen)
- provincial governors were chosen by the Tsar and could overrule the zemstva
- didn’t represent the population - nobility votes dominated
- some became critical or tsarist regime
- controlled by people who understood their area/way of life
What was the legal system like before the reforms?
- judiciary was antiquated, secretive and corrupt with justice usually residing in the hands of a local judge who made decisions in private
- no jury, no lawyers, no cross-examination
- the accused (usually serfs who had not access to representation were presumed guilty on unsubstantiated police evidence
- punishments were severe public flogging
- many believed that the whole system was backwards and they needed to follow the West