AKA Flashcards
single stimulus preference assessment
successive choice
experimental control
functional relation
analysis
control
Reversal design
ABAB
withdrawl
Type I error
false positive
when you think something had an effect but it didn’t
ex: Telling a man he’s pregnant
statistical analysis
False positive
statistical analysis
False negative
visual analysis
Type 2 error
false negative
occurs more often
visual analysis
magnitude
intensity
force
severity
topography
definitional measure
Alternating treatment
multi-element concurrent simultaneous multiple schedules you can have a final phase! no baselines!
confounding variable
uncontrolled
ex: weather, sickness
extraneous
environment
interval by interval
time sampling
point by point
frequency polygon
line graph
line graph
Cartesian plane
trend line
direction
line of progress: first data point to the last data point
component analysis
which part of intervention is working
comparing IV’s
parametric analysis
dosage
non-parametric
on/off
equal graph
line
scatterplot
bar
graph
scatterplot
pattern analysis
independent variable
time
sessions
hours
3 parts of baseline logic
prediction
verification
replication
powerful design to demonstrate functional relationships
ABAB
reversal
how many phases do you need to show functional relation?
3 data points
design to use for dangerous behaviors
BAB
intervention–> baseline–>intervention
threats to internal validdity
maturation
subject confounds
setting confounds
internal validity pg.232
M-I-S-S measurement confounds: bias setting confounds independent variable confounds subject confounds
treatment integrity
procedural fidelity
maturation
subject confounds
bootleg reinforcement
setting confounds
PLACHECK
momentary
time sampling
group
with-drawl design
DON’T use with SIB
multiple probe
use when your trying to see if behavior is in their repertoire
changing criterion design
only use for ONE behavior
sequence effects
happens the most with multiple treatment reversals
not sure which intervention is having a functional relation on behavior.
multiple treatment intereference
alternating treatment
NOT taking any treatments away!
disadvantage to alterntating treatment design
I-S-U
irreversibility
sequence effects
unstable data-data is all over the place
used with maintenance and generalization
probe design
Advantages of alternating treatment design
no with-drawl
minimizes irreversibility
can be used with unstable data
minimal sequence effect
threat to internal validity
Measurement confounds-Independent variable confound -Subject confound -S- setting confound
concurrent design
alternating treatment design
matching law
behavior goes where reinforcement flows
Why do we use alternating treatment design?
use for SIB, PICA, etc. because you DON’T need a baseline
changing criterion design requirement
needs to be in client’s REPERTOIRE!
Design that shows experimental control
ABABAB
Reversal Design
Withdrawal design
Target SINGLE target response
Reversal design
TWO separate target responses
alternating treatment
best to show functional relation, experimental control
Play condition aka
CONTROL
establishing operation
Increases value of reinforcement
Deprivation
trend
direction of data path (downward, upward)
level
increasing, decreasing, stable
maturation
threat to internal validity (puberty)
FR1
Continuous R+
CRF
FR2
Fixed Ratio 2
backward training
immediate reinforcement
Antecedent interventions
FCT, High P, NCR
Interdependent
ALL or NONE
Bar graphs (histograms)
best used for summary data
comparisons
In-situ training
natural environment teaching (NET)
Incidental Teaching
Positive punishment
ROSER Reprimand Overcorrection Shock Exercise Response blocking
Negative reinforcement
Relief
Escape
Avoidance
Abolishing operation
Decreases value of reinforcement
Satiation
masking
Behavior in repertoire
Being “masked” by confounding variables
affects stimulus control
Example: taking BCBA exam
overshadowing
DON’T have in repertoire.
Client cannot learn the bx because something is interfering
maximize effectiveness of punishment
punish the bx in EVERY setting with the highest magnitude
positive practice
engage in the appropriate action repeatedly
restitutional overcorrection
Leaving the environment in a better state.
single subject design
subject acts as his/her own control
doesn’t mean only one subject in study!
Reversal design (BAB, ABAB)
Use with SIB behaviors
Use if you DON’t have much time
When irreversibility is a problem in reversal design, which design would you use?
Use DRO/DRA/DRI
measurement confounds
reactivity
observer drift
observer bias
Type II error
occurs more often
false negative
IV did NOT have an effect on DV, when it actually did
satiation
Abolishing operation
NCR
fixed TIME operant antecedent intervention not contingent on appropriate behavior Abolishing operation (decreases attention seeking bx)
successive approximations
Shaping
differential reinforcement
Paired preference assessment
forced choice
successive choice
single preference assessment
single stimuli
presenting one stimuli after the other
anecdotal record
ABC recording
narrative recording
ABC recording
tact extension
extended tacts
reflexivity
identity matching
positive reinforcement
Type 1 reinforcement
negative reinforcement
Type 2 reinforcement
which experimental design shows control?
Reversal Design
What does alternating treatment designs minimize?
minimizes sequence effects
negative punishment
penalty principle
penalty contract
Function of Bx:
Aka for automatic
sensory
self-stimulatory
4 term contingency
MO/SD-R-S
A-B-C-D
Imitation Training
F-M-I-C Formal Similarity Modeling Immediacy Controlled relation (SD)