Air Pollution Week 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Main health impact of air pollution

A

Cardio-pulmonary diseases (heart/lungs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

WHO show how many died from all air pollution in 2016 (indoor/outdoor)

A

7 million

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mortality and morbidity from air pollution

A

Big contributor to mortality

Pollution is also a morbidity burden (not dying, but suffering)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Distribution of burden of air pollution across countries and communities

A

Tends to be in poor countries, and on poorer communities within countries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Health impacts examples on economy (3)

A

Strain to healthcare, work absence, productivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are social impacts and examples

A

Not captured by GDP

E.g people being alive and healthy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Measures to account for social impacts (2)

A

VOSL or QALYs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Important: considering causal impact of pollution on health. (Pollution causes ill health, not just a correlation)

Why is it important to establish causation not correlation?

A

To make policy changes appropriate. Which may be expensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Zhong et al (2017)

A

Based in China, 4 is unlucky.

Natural experiment:

Limit cars on road by last number on license plate. On days where 4 is restricted, less pollution as people avoid 4 on plates. On other days, more congestion and pollution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Note: we should exploit naturally occurring phenomena

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lavaine and Neidell (2013)

A

Refinery workers in France went on strike- fall in SO2 (sulfur dioxide) emissions.

Compared health outcomes for pregnant women before/after and in close/far proximity from refineries.

Pollution levels fell during strikes, and pregnancy outcomes improved with improved birth weights of babies, stillbirth less likely. 25km within strikes were similar to the far prox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is this method known as?

A

Differences in differences method.

I.e look at all different variables e.g before strike, after strike, and whether they are close, far from refineries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Moretti and Neidell (2011)

A

Natural experiment.

Ports in LA and Long Beach contribute to 25% of ozone pollution to city.

Bad seas in Shanghai, means no boats arrive in ports in lA as none arriving from Shanghai.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is this method known as?

A

Instrumental variables method

I.e sea conditions determine daily arrivals and thus pollution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Pollution on productivity: most pollluted country

A

India

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Chang et al (2016)

  1. Pros (2) and cons (4)of findings
A

Outdoor air pollution (Particulate Matter (PM2.5)) on productivity at pear-packing factory.

Study association between fruit boxes packed and PM2.5 levels that day. Similar results with call-centres

Cons
Decreased productivity (longer to pack pears)
Reduced wages for workers for performance related pay
This reduced productivity occurs at current air quality standards
Higher environmental regulations slow down production with business closures and job losses, so higher costs for the economy

Pros
Improving air quality=significant increases in productivity
Poor air quality does not affect worker’s decision on hours worked.

17
Q

What was the actual figure found (unit of PM increase leads to… in productivity)

A

10 unit increase in PM2.5 = 6% fall in productivity

18
Q

Hernstadt et al (2021) (CHICAGO WINDY CITY)

A

Examined crimes in Chicago by side of interstates.

Causal link between air pollution and aggressive behaviour. More wind… more crime

19
Q

Additional examples

A

Exposure to air pollution makes rats put on more weight.

Air pollution causes sleeplessness (used weibo more at night)

Air pollution causes worse grades (in Brazil university entrance tests)

20
Q

2 limitations and gaps on studies

1.Why many studies omit a large fraction of total population.

And what does this mean for results? Overestimated or underestimated? And what should be considered?

A

Many studies are focused on extreme outcomes e.g hospitalisation or mortality. Which typically focuses on elderly, infants or those with health conditions, rather than the working age population.

So pollution effects may have been underestimated.
We should consider subtler daily influences e.g asthma attacks

21
Q

Endogeneity of pollution

A

As firms increase productivity, they emit more pollutants. Reverse causality.

22
Q

Things to consider also in researching productivity on pollution (3)

A

Endogeneity of pollution

Changes in natural events can distort productivity e.g weather-so readjust sensitivity to account for these

Evidence in highest-skilled sector, where value added is highest. (Only covered basic manual jobs)