Ainsworths strange situation Flashcards
Strange situation
Person
Ainsworth (1969)
Ainsworths strange situation
Procedure and findings
Procedure └controlled observation in lab with 2 way mirror └behaviours to judge attachment: └proximity seeking └exploration/secure base └stranger anxiety └seperation anxiety └response to reunion └procedure of 7 episodes testing all behaviours
Findings └Ainsworth et al (1978)- 3 main attachment types Secure attachment (B)- 60-75% └explore happily but regularly go back to caregiver └moderate separation/stranger anxiety └accept comfort at reunion Insecure avoidant attachment (A)- 20-25% └explore freely, don’t seek proximity/secure base └low separation/stranger anxiety └don’t need comfort at reunion Insecure resistant (C)-3% └seek greater proximity, explore less └high stranger/separation anxiety └resist comfort at reunion
Ainsworths strange situation procedure
behaviours to judge attachment
└proximity seeking └exploration/secure base └stranger anxiety └separation anxiety └response to reunion
Attachment types
Secure attachment (B) Insecure avoidant attachment (A) Insecure resistant (C)
Ainsworths strange situation findings Secure attachment (B) Percentage
60-75%
Ainsworths strange situation findings Secure attachment (B)
60-75%
└explore happily but regularly go back to caregiver
└moderate separation/stranger anxiety
└accept comfort at reunion
Ainsworths strange situation findings
Insecure avoidant attachment (A)
Percentage
20-25%
Ainsworths strange situation findings
Insecure avoidant attachment (A)
20-25%
└explore freely, don’t seek proximity/secure base
└low separation/stranger anxiety
└don’t need comfort at reunion
Ainsworths strange situation findings Insecure resistant (C) Percentage
3%
Ainsworths strange situation findings Insecure resistant (C)
3%
└seek greater proximity, explore less
└high stranger/separation anxiety
└resist comfort at reunion
Ainsworths strange situation
Strengths
Summary
Support for validity- Kokkinos 2007, Ward et al 2006
Good reliability- Bick et al (2012)
Ainsworths strange situation
Strengths
Support for validity
└attachment type as defined by the strange situation is strongly predictive of later development
└secure usually have better success at school, better friendships and romantic relationships
└insecure-resistant attachment associated with worst out comes
└bullying in later childhood (Kokkinos 2007)
└adult mental health problems (Ward et al 2006)
└increases validity as can explain subsequent outcomes
Ainsworths strange situation
Strengths
Good reliability
└good inter-rater reliability
└different observers watching the same children in the strange situation generally agree on attachment type classification
└may be because takes place under controlled conditions and behavioural categories are easy to observe
└Bick et al (2012)
└agreement on attachment type for 94% of babies- team of trained strange situation observers
└can be confident that attachment type identified not due to observer
Ainsworths strange situation
Limitations
Summary
Culture bound - Takahashi (1990)
More attachment types - Main and Solomon (1986)
What does the strange situation measure - Kagan (1982)
Ainsworths strange situation
Limitations
Culture bound
└western
└different childhood/caregiver behaviour
└Takahashi (1990)
└Japanese mothers aren’t very separated= high separation anxiety
└at reunion stage Japanese mothers immediately scooped child up so child’s reaction hard to observe