AHA Guidelines - Coronary Artery Revasc 2021 Flashcards
significant L main disease preferred approach for revascularization
surgical - improves survival; PCI still better than med therapy in low/med complexity and LM equally suitable
in pt w/ stable IHD, nl EF, and 3v CAD, what is preferred revasc?
surgical - improves survival; PCI survival benefit is uncertain
radial artery vs saphenous vein for CAD revasc second target?
radial - superior patency, reduced cardiac events, improved survival;
make sure you know if and which radial was accessed during cath
best access for PCI for ACS or stable IHD?
radial better than femoral - dec bleeding and vasc complications, ACS w/ radial approach also has reduced mortality;
if doing CABG after cath and are planning radial conduit, make sure you know which arm was accessed
antiplatelets after PCI w/ stable IHD?
short duration of dual antiplatelet - reduces bleeding events; after 1-3 mo, transition to plavix monotherapy
Pt presents w/ STEMI s/p PCI for culprit artery. What to do for nonculprit artery intervention?
Staged perc intervention (while inpt or after DC) for nonculprit - improved outcomes; can be done at initial PCI, but benefit unclear - do if low-complexity and no renal disease.
PCI of nonculprit in cardiogenic shock can be harmful.
Triple vessel CAD and DM - preferred revasc?
surgical; PCI if poor candidate
What scoring system is best used for tx decisions for surgical revasc of CAD?
STS surgical risk score.
SYNTAX score benefit is less clear d/t interobserver variability - more useful for demonstration of complexity for PCI vs CABG decision.
What procedural measurement can help decision making to proceed w/ PCI in pt w/ angina or equivalent when it isn’t otherwise clear from cath?
FFR >0.8 or iFR >0.89 shows NO benefit from PCI
In pt w/ intermediate stenosis of LM artery, what can be used to help define lesion severity?
IVUS
STEMI and ischemic symptoms decision making?
WHEN did symptoms happen: < or > 12 hrs?
<12 hrs - PCI feasible? Proceed.
<12 hrs - PCI not feasible & LARGE AREA AT RISK? CABG
>12 hrs - <24 hrs? PCI (2a)
>24 hrs w/ total occlusion w/o sx or severe ischemia - NO PCI
ASSOCIATED ISSUES?
>12 hrs - cardiogenic shock or HF? revasc (PCI pref if feasible)
>12 hrs - ongoing ischemia, HF, VF/VT? primary PCI
Failed PCI in STEMI pt w/o ischemia or large area of myocardium; or w/ poor targets - NO emergency CABG.
In conclusion… revasc if <24, shock, ischemia, or unstable rhythm.
STEMI pt s/p PCI of infarct artery. Timing of CABG for complex multivessel non-infarct disease?
elective - reduce risk of cardiac events
Management for NSTE-ACS?
Shock? Angina? VF/VT? -> immediate revasc
GRACE >140? = high risk -> early revasc w/in 24 hrs
Initially stabilized w/ int/low risk of clinical event? - revasc before DC.
Shouldn’t DC these pts.
Revasc algorithm in pts w/ SIHD?
Refractory angina (eg requiring lots of nitro)? revasc (CABG best outcomes in intermed f/u)
LM? CABG
Multivessel? CABG (especially if low EF - benefit >10 yrs)
What SYNTAX score seems to confer CABG survival benefit over PCI for multivessel CAD?
SYNTAX 33
Pt w/ previous CABG with OPEN LIMA to LAD needs repeat coronary revascularization. What approach is recommended (2a)?
percutaneous - open LIMA to LAD increases risk of redo sternotomy; PCI has lower stroke and mortality rate
Pt w/ multivessel CAD is amenable to either PCI or CABG, but cannot take DAPT (access, tolerance, adherence, etc). What do you do?
CABG
A patient w/ CAD is undergoing NON-cardiac surgery. They do not have LM disease, and CAD is not complex. What do you offer?
Do NOT recommend routine coronary revascularization - no benefit.
ISCHEMIA-CKD randomized trial result?
Randomized cath revasc +/- GDMT in stable pt w/ moderate CKD vs conservative mgmt.
Initial invasive strategy showed NO benefit over conservative.
IE In asx ptx w/ stable CAD and CKD, routine angio and revasc not needed.
STILL should revasc STEMI and high-risk NSTE-ACS as long as measures are taken to reduce risk of AKI; low-risk NSTE-ACS should have risk/benefit analysis.
Pt presents w/ VF/VT or cardiac arrest d/t CAD. What should be done?
Revascularization.
In pt CAD and SCAR-RELATED sustained monomorphic VT, there is NO benefit from revascularization as the sole purpose of preventing recurrent VT
Should you perform routine revascularization for CAD?
No.
It SHOULD be considered in pts w/ instability or ongoing ischemia AFTER conservative therapy.