Agreement Flashcards
What is an offer?
An expression of willingness to contract on certain terms, made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed
In terms of the intention that it will become binding as soon as accepted, is the approach to intention subjective or objective?
The approach is objective - so the court looks at what was said and done between the parties from the perspective of a reasonable person - what would a reasonable person think was going on? Would they think that it will be binding as soon as accepted ?
The 5k vs 6k motorcycle example?
Because a reasonable person would assume that 5k was the intended asking price
What does ‘the person to whom it is addressed’ mean in the definition of an offer?
It can be a person, a class of people or even the whole world. The point is that you can only accept an offer that was addressed to you
What is an invitation to treat?
A preliminary statement that invited negotiation
Eg I may sell you my car for £2000
I am thinking of selling my car for £5000
Is picking up goods in a shop accepting an offer?
No - the goods in the shop are an invitation to treat.
When you go to the checkout you are offering to buy the goods and it is up to the shop keeper to decide if they are going to accept that offer
Are adverts for goods or services (in a newspaper or tv commercial or on a website) offers or invitations to treat and why?
They are invitations to treat because if they were offers then anyone asking for the advertised things would be accepting and that would be a problem if the advertiser had ran out of stock
Are adverts for rewards offers or invitations to treat?
They are offers so it encourages people to come forward and give the information
Are adverts to do something offers?
Yes eg buy x and you get £100 if you then get the flu - accepted at the point of purchasing it
It’s a unilateral contract
In an auction when is an offer accepted?
When the auctioneer’s gavel goes down - that is acceptance of the last bid, the last offer from a bidder.
The auctioneer inviting bids is simply an invitation to treat
What is the significance of having an auction without a reserve price?
If the auctioneer does not accept the bid even if it’s low, it will be a breach of a unilateral contract - the claimant should sue the auctioneer as it’s pointless to sue the owner of the property because the auctioneer didn’t accept the bid so there was no contract of sale with the owner
Is it a breach of a contract not to except a response to an advert for tender at the lowest price?
Yes
Can a company sue for loss of opportunity if their bid that is given on time is not considered
Yes as this is a breach of an implied promise to consider all bids that happen on time.
The example in the textbook is someone who had to put a tender in a letter box by noon, they do it at 11am and comply with the conditions of the offer but the offer isn’t collected by the post man that day - they can claim for loss of opportunity
What must an offer be to be valid
An expression of assent which is unqualified
As
What happens in the battle
Of the agreements
The last shot wins
In a battle of the forms if there is no acknowledgment slip and the seller just supplies the product?
It could be said that delivery of the machine might be regarded as acceptance by conduct of the last set of standard terms to be offered
What is the postal rule and where does it apply?
It only applies to acceptance
It means that a letter of acceptance will be effective when posted even if the letter is lost in the post
What are the conditions that must be satisfied in order for the postal rule to apply?
a) it was reasonable in all the circumstances to use the post
b) the letter was properly addressed, stamped and posted
And
c) the postal rule had not been excluded by the offeror
What did Holwell say about the postal rule?
That by using the word ‘notice in writing to the seller’ the offeror had impliedly excluded the buyer - it meant the acceptance actually had to reach the seller in order to be effective
Can an offer be accepted after being terminated?
No
What are the four ways of terminating an offer?
Counter-offer
Lapse of time
Withdrawal by the offeror
Express rejection by the offeree
How can rejection happen by the offeree?
Either expressly or impliedly by giving a counter-offer ?
Can an offer be revoked any time before the offer has been accepted?
Yes - even if the offeror has promised to keep the offer open.
The exception to this is that if someone has paid to keep the option open for a period of time (even a nominal amount like £1) then the offer is not revocable
Can an offer for a unilateral contract be revoked?
Generally it would be unfair to mean that a unilateral offer has only been accepted when you complete it - eg someone could revoke your offer of £100 to walk from Belfast to Dublin when you’re 2 miles from Dublin
So the courts make it that there are two offers in that situation. The express offer and the implied offer not to revoke if the specified act is started within a reasonable time. The acceptance and consideration for the implied promise is the commencement of the act
Must revocation be communicated to the offeree in order to be effective?
Yes
If a revocation is sent via electronic communication - when is it said to be received?
When it should have been read - which means when it is received if it was communicated in an instant way where a person should see it immediately in the ordinary course of business, but for their failure to act in a normal business like manner
How can an offeror revoke an offer made to the public at large?
The best they can do is to make an advert to the effect of revocation in the same way (like the same newspaper)
What are the differences in communication of acceptance and revocation?
Acceptance must be communicated by the offeree or an authorised agent whereas a notice of revocation can be given by the offeror or a reliable third party (someone objectively considered to be reliable)
The postal rule does not apply to notices of revocation
Must a contract be certain and complete
Yes - parties just reach a clear and complete agreement - so for example saying you’re happy to buy a car on ‘hire purchase agreement terms’ isn’t certain enough if you’ve not seen the terms
Is an agreement to buy ‘timber of fair specification’ too vague?
It seems vague but the court held there was a binding contract on the particular facts of a case. The parties dealt with eachother in the past, they were well acquainted with the timber trade and bad far as the parties concerned there was no uncertainty
If an offer is revoked for a higher offer what process does the court use to calculate damages
To compensate the offeree for loss of Bargain so the difference in their offer and the new offer that the seller received
Why are saying ‘would you be interested’ or ‘I may sell for £x’ NOT offers?
They are invitations to treat because they are not clear and certain.
They are invitations to make offers that the seller can then choose to accept or not
When are adverts not just invitations to treat?
If there is a clear set of instructions on what the customer needs to do, in return for those actions the customer gets a reward (eg money) and that reward has been set aside/deposited by the company making the advert to show an intention to be bound
When is an invitation to tender more than just an invitation to treat?
1) if they say they’ll accept the lowest or highest bid - that’s a unilateral offer and the offeror must accept the highest bid submitted
Or
2) the tender is made to a specified number of parties and contains clear conditions setting when and how the bids should be submitted (like a time limit and a method for posting). This is a unilateral offer to consider the bid (NOT accept) if it is submitted in the correct way stated. The seller does not have to accept the bid but must at least consider it and cannot completely ignore it
Why are statements of price examples tricky when deciphering between invitations to treat and offers?
Because it looks like an invitation to treat but it isn’t
If a party states the lowest price they would sell something at is inviting an offer from the buyer.
For example Adam says to bob that he will sell his lion for the lowest price bob is willing to offer. Bob states that that price is £400. Adam says he accepts - but there is no contract.
Bob only invited Adam to make an offer of the £400 which Adam now needs to accept or not
What is the effect of a counter-offer?
It ends the original offer - by giving a counter-offer you are rejecting the original offer - the new terms become a new offer that the original offeror can accept or reject
When will the general rule that the last shot wins in the battle of the forms not apply?
If a party fires the first shot by sending a document with terms attached to the counterparty and that counterparty signs the document (but then proceeds on new terms), the courts will hold the first party’s terms to govern the contract