Aggravated Robbery Flashcards

1
Q

Criminal Liability for Aggravated Robbery (offensive weapon)

A

Aggravated Robbery - s235(c) Crimes Act 1961

  • Being armed with any
  • offensive weapon or instrument, or any thing appearing to be such a weapon or instrument
  • Robs
  • Any other person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Criminal Liability for Aggravated Robbery (together with)

A

Aggravated Robbery - s235(b) Crimes Act 1961

  • Being Together
  • With any other person or persons
  • Robs
  • Any person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Criminal Liability for Aggravated Robbery (GBH)

A

Aggravated Robbery - s235(a) Crimes Act 1961

  • Robs
  • Any person
  • And at the time of (or) immediately before (or immediatly after the robbery
  • casues GBH
  • to any person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Causes

A

A person causes GBH if his or her actions make them criminally responsible for it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Grevious bodily Harm

A

Harm that is really serious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DPP v Smith

A

“Bodily harm” needs no explanation and “grievous” means no more and no less than “really serious”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Together with

A

There must be proof that, in committing the robbery, the defendant was part of a joint enterprise by two or more persons who were physically present at the robbery.

Each must share an intent to steal using their collective force should that be necessary and each must play some active role in the robbery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Joyce

A

“The Crown must establish that at least two persons were physically present at the time the robbery was committed or the assault occurred.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Joint enterprise

A

Mere presence during the commission of robbery, without active participation, is not sufficient; the provision applies only to cases where the forces of two or more people acting together are deployed against the victim in the actual commission of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Galey

A

Being together” in the context of s235(b) involves “two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force, either in any event or as circumstances might require, directly in the perpetration of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Being armed with

A

The term “being armed with” means that the defendant is carrying the item or has it available for immediate use as a weapon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Offensive weapon

A

offensive weapon means any article made or altered for use for causing bodily injury, or intended by the person having it with him for such use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Instrument

A

any item intended to be used as a weapon or to intimidate and overbear the victim’s will to resist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly