agentic state and legitimacy of authority Flashcards
what is an agentic state
milgram - obedience to destructive authority occurs because a person does not take authority
instead they believe they are acting for someone else - agent
agent - unfeeling puppet that experiences high anxiety (moral strain) when they realise that what they are doing in wrong but feel powerless to disobey
what is autonomous state
opposite of being in an agentic state
person in an autonomous state is free to behave according to their own principles and feels a sense of responsibility for their own actions
shift from autonomy to agency - agentic shift
milgram suggested that thus occurs when a person perceives someone else as an authority figure
authority figure has greater power because they have a higher position in a social hierarchy
in most social groups when one person is in charge other defer to the legitimate authority of this person and shift from autonomy to agency
what are binding factors
milgram - observed that many of his participants said they wanted to stop but seemed powerless to do so
wondered why they remained in an agentic state
binding factors - aspects of the situations that allow the person to ignore or minimise the damaging effect of their behaviour
reduce the moral strain they are feeling
strategies
shifts responsibility to the victim
denying damage they were doing to the victim
what is legitimacy of authority
auothroty people have in higher up positions such as teachers and parents
authority is legitimate as it is agreed by society
most of us accept that authority figures have to be allowed to exercise social power over others because this allows society to function smoothly
one of the consequences of this legitimacy of authority is that some people are granted the power to punish others
willing to give up some of our independence and hand control over to people we trust to excessive their authority properly
learn acceptance if legitimate authority from childhood from parents and then teachers
what is destructive authority
problems arise when legitimate authority becomes destructive
charasmatic and powerful leaders can use their legitimate powers for destructive purposes ordering people to behave in ways that are cruel and dangerous
obvious in milgrams study when the experimenters used prods to order participants to behave in ways that went against their consciences
give a strength for agentic state
research support
strength - milgrams own studies support the role of agentic state in obedience
most of milgrams participants resisted giving the shocks at some point and often asked the experimenter questions about the procedure
one of these - ‘who is responsible if learner is harmed’
when experimenter replied ‘i’m responsible,
participants went through with no further objections
shows that once participants perceived they were no longer responsible for their own behaviour they acted more easily as the experimenters agent as milgram suggested
give a limitation of agentic state
limited explanation
limitation - agentic shift doesn’t explain many research findings about obedience
example - does not explain the findings of Rank and Jacobsons study
found that 16 out of 18 hospital nurses disobeyed orders from a doctor to administer an excessive drug dose of a patient
doctors - authority figure
but almost all of the nurses remained autonomous
suggests that at best the agentic shift can only account for some situations of obedience
give a strength of legitimacy of authority
explains cultural differences
strength - useful account of cultural differences in obedience
many studies show that countries differ in the degree to which people are obedient to authority
example - Kilham and Man found that 16% if australian women went all the way to 450 volts in a milgram style study
Mantel, - 85% fir german
shows that in some cultures authority is more likely to be accepted as legitimate and entitled to demand obedience from individuals
this reflects the ways that different societies are structured and ow children are raised to perceive authority figures
give a limitation for legitimacy of authority
cannot explain all disobedience
limitation - legitimacy cannot explain instance of disobedience in a hierarchy where the legitimacy of authority is clear and accepted
includes nurses in Ranks and Jacobsons study
most of them were disobedient despite working in a rigidly hierarchal authority struture
also a significant minority of milgrams participants disobeyed despite recognising the experimenters authority
suggests that some people may just be more or less obedient than others
it is possible that innate tendencies to obey or disobey have a greater influence on behaviour than the legitimacy of authority figure