Agency + Partnerships Flashcards
F tells G, “Sell the car.” Does G have right to sell the car?
This is an agency question in a contract setting. Therefore, the agent needs actual authority to bind the principal at the time of the contract. Here, F has given express authority to G to sell the car. Otherwise, G could have authority if principal F’s conduct led G to believe he has authority but there’s no pattern of behavior here.
Which of the following parties must have contractual capacity to enter into an agency relationship?
A - The principal.
B - The agent.
C - Both principal and agent.
A. Only the principal must have contractual capacity to enter into an agency relationship.
To create an agency relationship, the respective parties must have capacity, but the degree of capacity required for a principal differs from that required for an agent. Generally, any person (including entities) having capacity to contract may appoint an agent. Any person may be an agent, even if she has no contractual capacity herself.
What is apparent authority?
Apparent authority is created where a principal holds another out as his agent to a third party. Apparent authority makes the principal a party to the contract—with contractual rights and liabilities.
What elements are required to establish a principal’s liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior?
To establish a principal’s liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior, two basic elements must be established: (i) an employer-employee relationship, and (ii) conduct within the scope of employment. A principal may be vicariously liable in certain instances where her agent acted with apparent authority where respondeat superior does not apply. A principal is not liable for torts committed by an agent functioning as an independent contractor.
What must a possessor of goods have to be able to transfer good title without authority?
For the possessor of goods to be able to transfer good title without authority, she must either have: (i) some indicia of ownership (e.g., title), or (ii) be a dealer in the goods. Although a dealer in goods will be a merchant, one may be a “merchant” without being a dealer in the goods at issue.
In a few jurisdictions, where a general agent exceeds her actual authority (i.e., violates orders) but the act performed is similar to the act authorized, the principal will be held liable. This is an example of:
inherent authority
There are situations where a person will purport to act on behalf of another without any type of authority. In such a situation, the principal may still be bound by the agent’s act if the principal subsequently ratifies the agent’s act.
What are the elements of ratification?
Principal can ratify an agent’s agreement if the principal expressly affirms the contract, accepts the benefit of it, or sues the third-party on it.
Who can be bound to a contract when the principal’s identity is disclosed to the third party and the agent had authority to enter the contract?
The principal and, if the parties intended the agent to be a party to the contract, the agent.
A principal gives his agent authority to enter a contract with a third party. The agent discloses to the third party that a principal exists, but does not disclose the principal’s identity. Who can be bound to the contract?
Where the third party knows of the principal’s existence but does not know his identity, both the authorized agent and the principal are liable on the contract.
If a principal negligently selects an incompetent independent contractor, the principal will be liable to the injured third party for:
their own negligence in the selection of the independent contractor.
*A principal will be liable for the independent contractor’s negligence if the principal hired the incompetent contractor with knowledge of the contractor’s incompetence.
What is a subagent?
A subagent is a person appointed by the agent to perform functions assigned to the agent by the principal. The agent will be held liable to the principal for breaches of the subagent.
Where the subagent has been appointed without authority, the subagent owes no duties to the principal. The agent alone will be responsible to the principal for performance of the agency duties and for any loss sustained because of the subagent’s conduct, with the agent’s only recourse being against the subagent. A subagent is not to be confused with a co-agent, who is another agent of the principal.
Unless otherwise agreed, a principal owes an agent a duty of:
compensation
T/F: A principal will not be bound by the agent’s acts where the principal sets limits on an agent’s authority, and a third party knows of the limits, but the agent exceeds the limits when dealing with the third party.
True.
T/F: An employer usually is not liable for the intentional torts of her employee on the simple ground that an intentional tort is clearly outside the scope of employment.
True. But where the intentional tort occurs as a natural incident to the carrying out of the employer’s business, or if any benefit may be found running to the employer, courts tend to hold the employer liable. If an employee intentionally chooses a wrongful means to promote the employer’s business, the employer will be held liable for any torts that result.
If an employer lends the services of her employee to another and the employee commits a tort while performing in his loaned role, who is liable?
In most situations, the employee remains under the right of control of the loaning employer, and thus the loaning employer is the only one liable for the employee’s torts. If the borrowing employer directs the actions of the employee, and so assumes the right of control of the employee, she will be liable for those actions if they are performed tortiously.