Agency & Partnerships Flashcards
An agency relationship exists if:
1) Assent – formal or informal agreement;
2) Benefit – the conduct primarily benefits the principal; AND
3) Control – the principal has the right to control the
agent (control doesn’t need to be significant).
Characterization by Parties:
The characterization of the relationship by the parties is irrelevant.
Definition: Agency is
A fiduciary relationship, where a person or entity (the agent) acts on behalf of another (the principal) AND both parties agree to the relationship.
Termination of Agency Relationship
An agency relationship terminates when:
a) Manifestation that the relationship is terminated by
either party;
b) Specified term of authority expires;
c) Death of principal or agent (by operation of law);
OR
d) Incapacity of principal or agent (by operation of
law) – except if a durable power of attorney exists.
Death of Principal: (Termination of Agency)
Common Law –> revoked regardless of whether 3rd party
has notice of principal’s death.
Some States –> NOT revoked until 3rd party has notice of
the death.
Agency Contracts:
Principal can terminate the agent at any time. BUT, principal may be liable for damages if agent is terminated prior to the expiration of a contract (unless agent materially breached contract).
A principal is bound to a contract entered into by its agent if the agent had:
actual authority and/or apparent authority
2 types of Actual Authority
Express Authority – by principal’s explicit directions to the agent (either orally or in writing)
Implied Authority– either:
(a) action is necessary to carry out agent’s expressly
authorized duties;
(b) agent acted similarly in prior dealings between
principal/agent; OR
(c) customary for agent in that position (silence/acquiescence can give rise to a reasonable belief of authority in the future).
Agent has actual authority when acting within their
reasonable understanding of authority, even if principal later shows the agent was mistaken.
Apparent Authority occurs when:
1) 3rd party reasonably believes the agent has
authority to act on behalf of the principal; AND
2) That belief is traceable from principal’s manifestations.
A principal holds the agent out as having authority when he:
(a) gives a position or title indicating authority;
(b) previously held out and did not published a revocation;
OR (c) cloaked the agent with the appearance of authority.
– Not applicable if 3rd party had knowledge that the agent did not have actual authority.
– Continues until principal communicates termination to 3rd parties.
- Unidentified/Partially Disclosed Principal
- Undisclosed Principal
(Apparent Authority)
- Apparent Authority CAN exist.
- Apparent Authority CANNOT exist.
Inherent Agency Power
Protects 3rd parties when dealing with agents even if there is no actual or apparent authority.
Two groups of Inherent Agency Power:
First Group: Subjects an employer to liability when an
agent acts in furtherance of employer’s business and his
conduct harms a 3rd-party.
Second Group: If an agent violates Principal’s orders and
there is no actual/apparent authority, inherent agency
applies when:
1) An agency relationship exits; AND
2) Agent engaged in acts that are generally of a kind that would fall within his actual authority, but for the violation of Principal’s instructions.
Ratification
Makes the principal liable for agent’s contracts entered into without authority.
Ratification occurs when the Principal:
1) Has knowledge of all material facts or contract
terms; AND
2) Assents to the same through words or conduct.
(Agent also remains liable if principal was not disclosed)
Generally, an agent has NO liability if they:
(Agent’s Contractual Liability)
(1) Fully disclose the principal to a 3rd party; AND
(2) Act within the scope of authority.
Agent will be liable if:
(Agent’s Contractual Liability)
(a) Conduct was unauthorized; OR
(b) Principal was undisclosed or partially disclosed (no name given) to the 3rd party.
Agent may seek Indemnification from a principal if: (1) agent is liable; AND (2) his conduct was authorized.
Liability for Agent’s Torts: (Employer)
Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an employer is liable for an employee’s negligent acts if the employee was acting within the scope of the employment.
Agent acts within Scope of Employment when:
a) Performing work assigned by the employer; OR
b) Engaging in course of conduct subject to employer’s control.
Scope Factors – Courts analyze these to determine scope of employment:
i) Conduct is of the kind employee is employed to
perform.
ii) Occurs substantially within authorized time and space limits;
iii) It is motivated (in whole or part) to serve the employer.
Time, place, and purpose test.
Not Within Scope of Employment:
Conduct is NOT within scope if unrelated and not intended to serve any purpose of the employer.