Agency & Partnerships Flashcards
Agency Formation:
When principal manifests assent to another person to act on behalf of principal.
Both parties must assent to the relationship.
No consideration required.
Capacity Issue: (Agency)
Incompetent person cannot be principal but can be agent.
Serving 2 Adverse Parties
Agent cannot serve for two adverse parties in a transaction. If he does, transaction is voidable by either party
Burden of proof for agency
rests on party asserting the relationship and proven by a preponderance of evidence
Subagent
Hired by the agent.
If subagent appointed without authority of principal, no agency relationship exists between the principal and the subagent.
Contract liability: When can an agent bind a principal?
Actual authority
Apparent authority
Actual authority
When P manifest to the agent to act in behalf of P. This can be express or implied.
Express authority is a direct request from the P
implied authority is anything the agent reasonably believes is necessary to accomplish the principal’s express request
Apparent authority
Arises from reasonable belief of third parties.
When due to behavior of the P, third party is led to believe that agent is acting within the principal’s behalf. This requires some sort of overt action by the principal such as words, conduct, failure to act.
Arises when agent exceeds authority and third party has no reason to know or agent has no authority
P is estopped from denying existence of agency relationship where P intentionally cause mistaken belief
Principle may ratify:
grant retroactive authority for his agent’s earlier unauthorized actions.
Contract liability to third parties: Third party versus Agent
Agent is personally liable where the principal is undisclosed or partially disclosed.
If third party later learns of identity of principal, it can elect to sue either principal or agent.
For torts, agent is liable for his own actions unless tort is within scope of employment.
Contract liability to third parties: Principal versus Third party:
P can be vicariously liable for acts of agent (respondeat superior).
a. Two questions to ask: Is it employee or contractor? Was the worker within scope of employment?
b. Conduct within scope of employment : liability is imposed if employee is performing tasks assigned by the employer. A frolic(substantial deviation from work) imposes no liability on principal but a detour does.
Note whether employee was advancing P’s interest, deviation occurred before or after employer’s objective
c. Independent contractors : No liability on principal unless inherently dangerous activity or non-delegable duty, or negligent hiring
d. Employee driving his own vehicle can still impose liability but commuting is an exception.
e. Knowledge of the agent is imputed to principal
Duties owed by the agent
Duty of care
Duty of loyalty
Duty of Duty to account
Duty of Candor
Duty not to compete
Duty of Care (Agent)
Agent must perform contract and render services with reasonable care, indemnify principal against loss
Duty of loyalty (agent)
Agent may not engage in self-dealing or usurp a business opportunity belonging to the principal.
Business opportunity is one that is so closely relayed to the principal’s business that it could be deemed incidental to the business.
Duty to Account (agent)
Agent must account for money or property received for the principal separately from his own