Agency and Partnership Flashcards
Principal’s Vicarious Liability for Torts of Agent (elements)
A principal will be vicariously liable for torts committed by its agent if:
1) there is a principal-agent relationship and
2) the tort was committed by the agent within the scope of that relationship.
Principal-Agent relationship (elements)
A principal-agent relationship requires 1) assent, 2) benefit, and 3) control.
Assent can be even an informal agreement, as long as the principal has the capacity to agree.
The agent’s conduct must be for the principal’s benefit.
The agent must be under the control of the principal, by having the power to supervise the manner of the agent’s performance.
3 Elements needed to form: (1) Consent (2) Capacity (3) Writing if required (by statute of frauds)
Only MINIMAL capacity required for agent (thus minor can be agent).
Principal’s Vicarious Liability for Torts of Sub-agents and Borrowed agents
A principal will only be liable for a sub-agent’s tort if there is assent, benefit, and control between the principal and the sub-agent. There is rarely assent or control, so the principal usually is not liable.
A principal is usually not liable for the tort of a borrowed agent for the same reason - the principal does not control the borrowed agent.
Principal’s Vicarious Liability for Torts of Independent Contractors
Typically, a principal is not liable for the torts of an independent contractor because the principal does not control the contractor.
HOWEVER, a principal will be liable for an independent contractor’s tort if:
1) the contractor is engaged in an inherently dangerous activity (for the principal, e.g. brake repair),
2) the principal holds out the contractor with the appearance of agency (estoppel),
3) the contractor commits the tort against an invitee of the principal on the principal’s premises
Scope of the Principal-Agent Relationship for Tort Liability
The tort must be in the scope of the relationship for the principal to be liable. This includes:
- conduct that was “of the kind” the agent was hired to perform
- torts committed by the agent by which the agent intended to benefit the principal
- torts occurring “on the job”
If the agent took a new and independent journey, it is outside the scope of employment (frolic). If the agent merely departed from an assigned task but was fundamentally still on task, within the scope of employment (detour).
Principal’s Vicarious Liability for Agent’s Intentional Torts
Normally, intentional torts are outside the scope of employment and thus the principal is not liable.
EXCEPTIONS:
1) The tort was authorized by the principal
2) The tort was natural from the nature of the employment (e.g. a bouncer)
3) The tort was motivated by a desire to serve the principal
Principal’s Vicarious Liability for Contracts of Agent
A principal is liable for the contracts of its agent only if the agent had authority to enter the contract.
There are 4 types of authority:
1) Actual Express Authority
2) Actual Implied Authority
3) Apparent Authority
4) Ratification
Actual Express Authority of Agent (for contracts)
Where the principal authorized the agent to form a contract with an express statement.
Generally the statement can be oral, even a whisper.
EXCEPTION: if the underlying contract must be in a signed writing (falls under the Statute of Frauds), then the authorization must also be in writing.
Express authority can be revoked by:
1) unilateral act of either the principal or the agent, or
2) death of the principal.
The scope of authority is narrowly limited to the words within it.
Actual Implied Authority of Agent (for contracts)
Where the principal gives the agent authority through conduct or circumstance.
1) Necessity: there is actual implied authority to do all tasks that are necessary to do an expressly authorized task.
Ex: “Close the deal,” is an express grant of authority that implies many other authorized tasks.
2) Custom: There is an implied authority to do all tasks performed by people who have agents’ title or position.
Ex: a driver normally drives people around.
3) Prior dealings between the principal and the agent: there is an implied authority to do all tasks that the agent believes to be authorized from prior acquiescence by the principal.
Apparent Authority of an Agent (for contracts)
An agent has apparent authority when 1) the principal “cloaked” the agent with the appearance of authority, and 2) a third party reasonably relies on the appearance of authority.
Death of P does not automatically revoke apparent authority.
This is to protect innocent third parties.
If 3rd party has notice authority has been revoked/is gone, no apparent authority.
Ex: Agents sells the antique clock while principal is out, against express orders - agent had apparent authority and principal is bound to the contract.
Ratification (of Agent’s formation of contract)
Principal can grant authority after the contract has been entered if:
1) principal has knowledge of all material facts regarding the contract, and
2) principal accepts its benefits.
EXCEPTION: ratification cannot alter the terms of the contract.
Ex: A enters contract with C for 1000 boxes. P hears of the deal and tells A, “Good job, but I only need 500 boxes.” No ratification, as P seeks to alter the terms of the contract.
Agent’s Liability on Contracts made on behalf of Principal
Generally, authorized agents are not liable on their authorized contracts - only the principal is.
EXCEPTION: if the principal is partially disclosed (only the identity of the principal is concealed) or undisclosed (existence of principal is concealed), the authorized agent may nonetheless be liable at the election of the third party.
Agent’s Duties to Principal (and Principal’s Remedies if Agent Breaches)
Agents owe duties of care, obedience and loyalty to principals, in return for reasonable compensation and reimbursement of expenses.
If a duty is breached, the principal may recover losses caused by the breach and can disgorge profits made by breaching.
Agent’s Duty of Care
Agent has a duty to take reasonable care when acting on behalf of the principal (i.e. not to be negligent).
Agent’s Duty of Obedience
Agent has a duty to obey the instructions of a principal that are reasonable (e.g. nothing illegal, no lying).
Agent’s Duty of Loyalty
The agent owes a duty of loyalty to the principal, such that the agent must not:
1) Self-deal (benefit at the expense of the principal)
2) Usurp the principal’s opportunity,
3) Make a secret profit at the principal’s expense