Agency and Partnership Flashcards
An agency is a
fiduciary relationship that arises when one person (the “principal”) appoints another (the “agent”) to act on the principal’s behalf and the agent consents to act.
Formation of an agency relationship
1) consent of both principal and agent
2) Principal has contractual capacity
Agent’s duties to principal
- Duty of care - agent owes a duty to their principal to carry out their agency with reasonable care
- Duty of loyalty - no self dealing
- Duty of obedience- An agent must obey all reasonable directions of their principal.
Duties of Principal to Agent
The principal is NOT a fiduciary of the agent
all of the duties imposed by their contract, reasonable compensation, cooperation and reimbursement for expenses/ indemnification.
actual authority
Principal’s words or conduct (manifestations) lead the agent to reasonably believe that they have authority to bind the principal
Actual authority may be express (e.g., oral or written statements, including provisions in the company’s organizational documents) or implied (e.g., inferred from words used, from custom or from the relations between the parties)
common types of implied actual authority
- incidental authority- agent can do things that are necessarily implied from expressly authorized authority
- title or postiion
- arising out of custom
- prior ac1uiesance by principal
- delegate authority for ministerial acts
Termination of actual authority
- condition in agreement
- Lapse of a reasonable time
- Agent breaches fiduciary duty
- Either party’s unilateral termination
- Operation of law (death of principal + agent had received notice, death of agent, loss of capacity)
are agencies revocable?
YES
unless Irrevocable agencies- agency coupled with an interest or given as a security cannot be unilaterally terminated if agency was given to protect the agent’s rights and it is supported by consideration
agent by estoppel
Where the principal negligently permits an impostor to be in a position to appear to have agency authority, the principal will be held liable for the impostor’s actions undertaken with such authority
Apparent authority may be established through
- agent’s title or position
- Imposters (estoppel)
- Principal makes a knowing omission despite agent’s holding out as their agent
- Lingering apparent authority- Where an agent’s actual authority has terminated, he will have apparent authority to act on the principal’s behalf as to all third parties with whom the principal knows he dealt unless and until the third parties receive notice of the termination.
- Death or Incompetency - The majority view is that death or incompetency of the principal does not automatically terminate the agent’s apparent authority.
Ratification
Ratification- if agent purports to act on behalf of a principal without any authority to do so, but the principal subsequently ratifies the contract, the principal is bound
Ratification may be express (oral or written) or implied (ex: “principal” accepts the benefits of the contract, silence if there is a duty to disaffirm, or suing on the transaction)
requirements
* 1) P must have knowledge (or reason to know) of material facts of contract
* 2) P must accept the entire transaction
* 3) P must have contractual capacity
* 4) Principal must have been either a known principal (identity of P was disclosed to the other party to the contract) or unidentified principal (existence of the principal is known, but the principal’s identity is withheld)
Who is bound by Contract entered into by Agent?
Principal is liable to third parties if agent had actual or apparent authority or ratified
agent is liable if lacked authority to enter into contract
* There is an implied warranty of authority when agent makes contract, so if agent lacked authority to enter the contract, implied warranty of authority is breached → agent is liable to third party
Agent is NOT liable if had apparent, actual or ratified authority
* Exception: the agent may be held personally liable if the existence and identity of the principal were not disclosed.
Liability of the third party
* If disclosed principal, only the principal may enforce the contract
* If undisclosed or unidentified then either the agent or the principal can enforce
Respondeat superior
An employer is vicariously liable for the unintentional torts of an employee committed within the scope of employment
Is the agent an employee or independent contractor?
Test: does the principal have a right to control the manner in which the employee preforms the service?
- degree of skill required on the job (where great skill is required, more likely to be independent contractor)
- Whose tools and facilities
- period of employment
- basis of compensation
- Whether the person has a distinct business
- The characterization and understanding of the parties
The customs of the locality regarding supervision of work
Employer is not liable for intentional torts of employees unless
- Authorized
- motivated to serve the employer; or
- nature of the work gives rise to hostilities/ friction
Also, a principal is liable for an agent’s misrepresentations (including intentional misrepresentation) if the agent had actual, apparent, or inherent authority to make statements concerning the subject matter involved.
is principal vicariously liable for Indpendant contractor’s torts?
NO, unless
* (1) inherently dangerous activities (such as blasting) are involved, or
* (2) non-delegable duties have been delegated (buisness premisis exception)
would be liable for own torts of negligent hiring or nrgligent entrustment