Agency and Partnership Flashcards
Acts of a partner after the dissolution of a partnership
- A partnership will be bound by a partner’s post-dissolution act if the act was appropriate for WINDING UP the business
- A partnership will be bound by a partner’s post-dissolution act EVEN if it was not appropriate for winding up if
1. The third party with whom the partner dealt did not have notice of the dissolution of the partnership
2. The act would have bound the partnership before dissolution (apparent or actual authority)
Actual authority
ACTUAL authority: authority agent reasonably thinks she possesses based on principal’s dealings with her.
- PRINCIPAL’S manifestation (words/actions) –> would a reasonable AGENT think they are authorized to act?
- Express: oral / written
- Implied: actions (e.g., acquiescence, customs, necessary tasks)
- Must exist when agent ENTERS into contract / at time of TRANSACTION
- Binds principal
Agency
Created when one person (PRINCIPAL) manifests an INTENT that another person (the AGENT) act on his behalf and both parties CONSENT to the agreement.
- The FIDUCIARY relation results from the manifestation of consent by one person to another, that the other shall act on his behalf, and subject to this control, and consent by the other so to act
- Agent, principal
1. Consent (both parties) - Express
- Conduct
2. On behalf of: agent must be acting PRIMARILY for the benefit of the principal, rather than the agent / 3d party - Agent = fiduciary
3. Control: agent must act subject to the principal’s control - Degree of control is not very high; enough that principal has specified task, even if not in detail…
** Analysis for Agent Binding Principal
- Actual authority?
- Apparent authority?
- Ratification?
** Analysis for agent entering into a contract
- Authority?
- Ratification?
- Estoppel?
Apparent Authority
** What happened between the principal and the third party? What did they do to indicate that the agent had authority?
PRINCIPAL holds out another as possessing another and a third party is reasonably lead to believe that authority exists
- PRINCIPAL’s MANIFESTATION (words/conduct) would lead reasonable THIRD PARTY to believe agent has authority
- Protects innocent 3d parties against principals holding out people as agent
- Does not require actual authority (i.e., the agent need not think he has authority)
- Binds principal
- Cannot be created unilaterally by agent / other actor…must be through PRINCIPAL
- What are the INDUSTRY NORMS? Informs what is REASONABLE
** Are partners also agents?
Yes, each partners is an agent of the partnership for the purpose of its business
Are partnership interests transferrable?
Yes, a partner has a transferrable interest in thte PROFITS and LOSSES of the partnership and ther right to recieve DISTRIBUTIONS
- Considered personalty, may be transferred voluntarily or involuntarily at any time
- Transfer creates in transferee a right to receive distributions to which the transferror would otherwise be entitled
** TRANSFEE DOES NOT BECOME A PARTNER BY VIRTUE OF THE TRANSFER! Absent an agreement by the other partner(s)
Capacity
- Principal must have contractual capacity.
- Agent does not need to! They are just a go-between, can be a child, etc.
** Compensation for agency
Unless otherwise agreed upon, agent is entitled to reasonable compensation
Consideration
Not required to form an agency relationship.
- Agent can do so gratuitously
** Creation of the agency relationship
Requires -
- Capacity
- Consent (both parties)
- Writing, if required by SOF
** Death in agency
Death terminates an agency unless it is irrevocable
Dissociation
A withdrawal of a PARTNER from the partnership, i.e., by partner ceasing to be associated with the carrying on of a business.
- DISSOCIATION BY EXPRESS WILL: giving NOTICE of his desire to leave is an event of dissociation; automatically triggers dissolution…
- Expelled
- Dying
- Declaring bankruptcy
- Agreed upon event
- Appointment of a receiver
Dissolution of the partnership / Consequences of dissolution
- AT-WILL Partnership: dissolved when a partner NOTIFIES the partnership of his intent to withdraw
- Business must be wound up - Term partnership: only if w/in 90 days after dissociation 1/2 of remaining partners agree to wind up
** Estoppel
Can be raised when the PRINCIPAL creates the appeareance than an employee-employer relationship exists and a third party relies on that relationship
Finances in limited partnership
Profits: Distribution made on basis of contributions (cf. general, equal)
Financial rights of partnership
Default rules
1. Unless otherwise agreed, profits are shared EQUALLY among partners by number. Ownership stake doesn’t matter. And losses are shared in the same manner as profit splitting (losses follow profits, but not vice versa)
Profits > Losses
Losses ≠ Profits
- If losses are agreed on, profits will still be shared equally
Independant Contractor
Person who contracts with another to do something for him, but is not controlled by the other re: physical conduct of undertaking
- Merely specified task to be performed
- Controlled in RESULTS only, not in how to achieve those results
- P is not liable for torts
Indicia of partnership
- Share of profits is to repay a debt, is as compensation, etc. (≠)
- Share of the profts, presumed to be a partner
- Extent of parties’ activity in enterprise, supports partnership
- Absence of an agreement to share losses may be evidence that parties did not intend to form a partnership
- Length of time profit sharing (for duration of business?)
- Share of losses
** Is a new partner is liable for obligations that pre-dated her admission into the partnership?
No!
** Is the agent liable on a contract?
Bound unless principal’s existence and identity are disclosed
Liabilities of the partners
Jointly and severally liable for all obligations of partnership, regardless of tort / contract
- Plaintiff must first exhaust partnerSHIP resources before seeking from individual partner. Partner is essentially a guarantor.
- Where one partner parts, entitled to indemnification / pro rata contribution
- Partners can limit liability amongst themselves, but not against 3d parties (unless agreed to)
Liability for partnership debt
Each partner is jointly and severally liable for partnership obligations
- Where one partner pays the entire amount, can get pro-rata contribution from other partner(s)
- In the absence of agreement, partners share profits EQUALLY and losses are split in the same way as profits
Liability in a partnership to third party - Contract
A partnership is liable for ALL CONTRACTS entered into by a partner in the SCOPE of the partnership business or with ACTUAL or APPARENT authority of the partnership.
Actual authority: authority the a partner reasonably believes he has based on the communications between the partnership and the partner. Can come from -
- Partnership agreement
- Vote of the partners
- Majority vote: authorize ordinary business
- Unanimous vote: extraordinary acts - Partnership files a STATEMENT OF PARTNERSHIP AUTHORITY with the SoS / also with COUNTY for real property transfers
- Transactions involving real property: binding on 3d parties if statement is recorded in the county where the property is located; 3d parties are benefitted by filed grants of authority, burdened by filed restrictions on authority
- Transactions NOT involving real property: binding on the partnership unless the third party has actual knowledge that the partner lacked authority. Restrictions on partner authority in the statement are NOT binding on 3d parties. 3d parties only have notice of filed grants of AUTHORITY, not restrictions. 3d parties are benefitted by filed grants and are not burdened by restrictions. Only actual knowledge burdens them.
- STATUTORY Apparent Authority: by statute, partner is an agent of the partnership, and that partner has apparent authority to bind partnership to transactions in ordinary course of business, unless 3d party aware that lacks authority. Cannot contract out of it (as with anything that impacts rights of 3d parties)
Liability in a partnership to third party - Tort
Partnership is liable for injury caused to a person as a result of the tortious conduct of a partner (or employee)
- Acting in the ORDINARY COURSE of business of the partnership or
- With AUTHORITY of the partnership (intentional torts, acting on behalf)
Liability in LP
- General partners are liable for the obligations of the limited partnership; investment + personal assets
- Limited partner is not personally liable; can only lose value of their INVESTMENTS.
- Always liable for your own torts
- General partners owe fiduciary duties (those with management rights)…same as in general partnership
** Liability of a partner in an LLP
Not personally liable, including for torts of a co-partner
Liability of admitted partner
** Requires unanimous vote
Not personally liable for partnership obligations that arose before his admission
** Liability of incoming v. outgoing partners
An outgoing partner generally REMAINS liable for ALL partnership obligations incfcured while they were partner
Incoming partner generally has no liability for obligations incurred before they became partners
Limited partnership
Partnership with at least one general partner and at least one limited partner
Must file a CERTIFICATE of limited partnership with SoS
- Certificate requires minimal information…details are in partnership agreements, which are private. Names of partners, address, agent of service.
- Cf. general partnership, nothing to file
- NAME must contain Limited Partnership, LP…alert the public to limited nature
If they don’t comply with statute, they are just a GENERAL partner
LLP, RLLP
General partnership where all of the partners have limited liability
- Must file statement of qualification with SoS (name of partnership, election of LLP, date)
- Must have LLP of some form in name to give public notice
- Partner is not personally liable