Agency and Partnership Flashcards
Agency
Fiduciary relationship that exists between agent and principal where agent acts on principal’s behalf and is subject to principal’s control
Agency relationship is created when:
1) Parties voluntarily consent (express/implied) to enter agency relationship
AND
2) Agent is subject to principal’s control [supervision is sufficient; amt of ctrl may be ltd]
Agency relationship terminates by the parties if:
1) Agent/princ manifests to other the desire to cease the agency relationship [termination effective upon notice]
2) Express terms of the agency expire
OR
3) Purpose of agency relationship is fulfilled
Agency relationship terminates by operation of law if:
1) Agent/princ dies [some jx require notice]
2) agent/princ loses capacity [some jx require notice]
OR
3) Agent materially breaches a fiduciary duty owed to the principal
Authority of agent to bind principal
An agent may bind a principal to a K if the agent is acting within his actual or apparent authority OR inherent agency power.
Once a principal is validly bound to a K by his agent, the principal is liable under the terms of the K
An agent acts with actual authority when:
at the time of taking action that has legal consequences for the principal, the agent reasonably believes, in accordance with the principal’s manifestations to the agent, that the principal wishes the agent to act
Actual express authority
Principal directs agent to engage in the precise task in question
Actual implied authority
agent believes, based on a reasonable interpretation of the principal’s words or conduct, that the principal wishes agent to act on principal’s behalf
Incidental authority
Agent’s authority to conduct a transaction includes the authority to engage in actions that are incidental to it, usually accompany it, or are reasonably necessary to accomplish it
EX: P tells A “sell my car” – A has authority to take actions that are reasonably necessary to sell the car
Apparent authority
1) Person dealing with agent has a reasonable belief in agent’s authority
AND
2) The belief was generated by some act or neglect on the part of the principal
Apparent authority does NOT exist when:
third party has knowledge that agent does not have actual authority
Inherent agency power
Allows courts to hold principal liable for damages to third parties even when the principal’s agent acted WITHOUT actual or apparent authority.
Applied when:
1) an agency relationship exists
AND
2) totality of the circumstances weighs against forcing the third party to absorb all of the damages
Undisclosed principals
Agent is liable if principal is undisclosed - third party does not know agent is acting on someone else’s behalf)
NOTE: Agent for undisclosed principal CANNOT have apparent authority because the principal cannot hold the agent out as having authority to a third party if the third party is unaware of the principal
Partially Disclosed Principal
Respondeat Superior
An employer (principal) may be liable for torts committed by an employee (agent) if:
1) employer-employee relationship exists (NOT independent contractor)
AND
2) employee’s commission of the tort occurs within the scope of employment
Employer-employee relationship
Determined by extent of control principal exercises over details of agent’s work
Scope of employment
Activity is within scope of employment when employee’s conduct is of the same general nature as that authorized, or incidental to the conduct authorized by the employer.
FACTORS:
Whether employee’s conduct was:
1) function for which employee was hired to perform
2) within employer’s authorized time and space limits
3) conducted to serve the employer
AND
4) foreseeable to employer
Detour vs Frolic
Employer remains liable during employee’s detour (minor deviation from scope of employment), even if detour is mainly for employee’s own personal reasons
Employer does NOT remain liable during employee’s frolic (major deviation from scope of employment)
Intentional torts of employees
Generally, employers are NOT liable for intentional torts of employees UNLESS:
1) intentional tort was authorized by the employer
OR
2) force is within the scope of employment in the employee’s work (security guard)
Independent contractor
A person who contracts with another to do something for him but who is not controlled by the other nor subject to the other’s right to control with respect to his physical conduct in the performance of the undertaking
Factors to determine independent contractor vs employee
KEY FACTOR: Principal’s amount of control
Other relevant factors:
1) nature of the work
2) skill required in particular occupation
3) who supplies the equipment/tools to perform the work
4) method of payment
5) length of employment
6) how the parties characterize the transaction
When may a principal be liable in tort for the unauthorized conduct of an independent contractor?
Generally not, but may be liable when independent contractor:
1) makes misrepresentations for the benefit of the principal
2) is engaged in abnormally dangerous activities
OR
3) acts with apparent authority
Ratification
Principal can ratify agent’s unauthorized conduct, thereby making principal liable to third parties for contracts entered into by the agent if:
1) principal had knowledge of material facts (K terms)
2) agent purported to act on the principal’s behalf
AND
3) principal affirmed the agent’s conduct by manifesting an intent to treat the agent’s conduct as authorized (accepting the benefits of the agent’s originally unauthorized action)