Agency and Partnership Flashcards
agency - definition; 3 important parts
Agency is the fiduciary relation which results from the manifestation of consent by one person to another that the other shall act on his behalf and subject to his control, and consent by the other to so act.
- Consent: consent from both principal and agent is necessary to form an agency relationship. Consent may be established expressly (written or oral statements), or by implication from the parties’ conduct.
- On behalf of: this requirement is generally understood to mean that the agent must be acting primarily for the benefit of the principal, rather than for the benefit of the agent or some other party.
- Control: the agent must act subject to the principal’s control, but the degree of control exercised by the principal does not have to be sig. Requisite level of control may be found by fact that principal has specified the task that the agent should perform, even if the principal hasn’t prescribed the details of how the task should be accomplished.
do we need capacity, writing, and consideration for agency relationship?
principal needs capacity
no writing unless SOF
no consideration needed
What are the duties that the agent owes to principal?
- Fiduciary Duties: an agent is a fiduciary of the its principal, and owes corresponding fiduciary duties to its principal.
a. Duty of care: agent owes a duty to her principal to carry out her agency with reasonable care (“sliding scale” depending on special skills that the agent may have)
b. Duty of loyalty: agent owes a duty of undivided loyalty to the principal. This includes the following obligations:
i. An agent must account to the principal for any profits made while carrying out the principal’s instructions
ii. An agent must act solely for the benefit of the principal and not to benefit himself or a third party
iii. An agent must refrain from dealing with his principal as an adverse party or from acting on behalf of an adverse party
iv. An agent may not compete with his principal concerning the subject of the agency
v. An agent may not use the principal’s property (including confidential information) for the agent’s own purposes or third party’s purposes.
vi. Breach of duty of loyalty: may sue for breach damages and for disgorgement of profits made as a result
c. Duty of Obedience: An agent must obey all reasonable directions from his principal. While the principal may be liable for the agent’s acts in violation of directions (apparent authority), the agent will be liable to principal for any loss that the principal suffers.
actual agency: definition, types, and termination
actual authority is authority that the agent reasonably thinks she possesses based on the principal’s dealings with her. Actual authority may be express or implied.
Express actual authority - principal conveys in words - written or oral
Implied Actual Authority: authority implied from principal’s words, conduct or custom or from acquiescence by the principal to do acts necessary and incidental to the act that the principal.
Termination of Actual Authority: actual authority must exist when the agent enters into the contract. It will be terminated/revoked:
i. After a specified time or event, or after a reasonable time
ii. By a change of circumstances (e.g., the subject matter of the agency is destroyed)
iii. By a breach of the agent’s fiduciary duty
iv. By a unilateral act of either the principal or the agent
v. By death of incapacity of the principal or agent
Apparent authority
If the principal’s words or conduct would lead a reasonable person in the third party’s position to believe that the agent has authority to act on the principal’s behalf, the agent has apparent authority to bind the principal.
- power of position
- unilateral agent reps
- lingering apparent authority
ratification: definition, methods, requirements
Even if the agent had no authority at the time of entering into the contract, the principal will still be bound by the agent’s actions if the principal ratifies the contract. Ratification effectively serves as a substitute for before-the-transaction authority.
methods: express or implied
requirements:
i. Principal must have KNOWLEDGE of all material facts regarding the contract
ii. Principal must accept the ENTIRE transaction. Can’t ratify portion.
iii. Ratification cannot be used to ALTER the rights of intervening parties.
rules for liability on contract: general rule, two exceptions
General rule: if actual authority, apparent authority, or ratification is present, the principal is liable on the contract and the agent is not.
Exception: if the principal is undisclosed (at the time of the agent’s transaction, the third party has no notice that the agent is acting for a principal) or partially disclosed (at the time of the agent’s transaction, the third party has notice that the agent is acting for a principal, but has no notice of the principal’s identity), the agent is also liable on the contract (the principal is still liable).
What is a servant and what is an independent contractor
servant - agent employed by a master
Independent contractor: person who contracts with another to do something for him but who is not controlled by the other nor subject to the other’s right to control with respect to his physical conduct in the performance of the undertaking.
scope of employer liability
Master is liable for torts committed by a servant within the scope of the servant’s employment. Servant and master are jointly and severally liable.
Principal is not liable for torts committed by ind contractor in connection with his work.
how to tell if employee or general contractor: general rule, 6 factors
In general, if a person is subject to the control of another as to the means to achieve a particular result, he is a servant. By contrast, if a person is subject to control of another as to his results only, he is an ind contractor.
Factors:
1. Skills required
Where great skill is required, more likely to be ind contractor
- Tools and facilities
If p supplies the told and facilities used to perform job, more likely to be employee - Period of employment
Long/indefinite – more likely to be employee - Basis of compensation
Comp is on basis of time, more likely to be employee
Comp is on basis of job, more likely to be ind contractor - Business purpose
If the person was hired to perform an act in furtherance of the principal’s business, more likely to be employee - Distinct business
A person who has her own business or occupation is more likely to be an ind contractor
scope of employment rule and 3 inquiries that are helpful
A master is not automatically liable for a servant’s torts. A master is only liable if the servant was acting within the scope of his employment. Three factors are helpful in making this assessment.
- Was the conduct “of the kind” that the agent was hired to perform?
- Did the tort occur “on the job” (within time and space limits of employment)?
a. Minor deviation is usually within scope (detour) (Picking up something on the way back to work)
b. Substantial deviation not within scope (frolic) - Was the conduct actuated at least in party to benefit the principal?
Rule re respondeat superior and intentional torts; exceptions
An employer is not liable for intentional torts of an employee. Intentional torts are viewed outside scope of employment.
Exceptions: within scope if (1) natural from nature of the job, (2) motivated to serve employer, or (3) specifically authorized or ratified by employer.
master direct liability
every person is liable for his own torts. Thus master is liable for his own negligence if he fails to properly train or supervise employees or fails to check an employee’s criminal record or job history.
Partnership - how is it formed
A partnership is formed as soon as two or more persons associate to carry on as co-owners a business for profit, regardless of whether the parties subjectively intend to form a business partnership. No stated filing or other formalities are required.
Factors in determining whether a partnership was formed
Most important: profit sharing: person receiving share of profits is presumed to be a partner unless the profits were received in payment: (1) of a debt, (2) as wages or other comp, (3) as rent, or (4) as interest on a loan.
Sharing of GROSS RETURNS (revenues of a business) NOT sharing profits
Right to participate in control of business
Loss sharing
partnership by estoppel
if no partnership was formed in fact, parties may still be liable as if they were partners to protect reasonable reliance by third parties.
what is the general rule re voting/management and what are the different voting requirements for different situations?
Unless otherwise agreed, all partners have equal rights in the management of the business and equal votes.
Decisions regarding matters within the ordinary course of the partnership business require majority vote of the partners.
Matters outside the ordinary course of business require the consent of all partners.