Agency Flashcards
What is a big indicator to look for in determining if someone is an employee or an independent contractor to an employer?
The degree of control that a employer can exert. The more control the more likely it is an employee
If an employee creates intellectual property while on the job who does it belong to?
the employer
What does an employer have to worry about with an employee but not an independent contractor?
1- fed and state income tax withholding
2- social security taxes
3- fringe benefit inclusion
4- workers compensation insurance
5- unemployment compensation insurance
6- Respondeat superior liability
7- workplace safety rules
8- anti-discrimination laws
Generally a independent contractor can’t cause vicarious liability because of the doctrine of “Respondeat Superior”, however, if ____________ then the employer too will be potentially liable.
the work is ultra-hazardous
ex. someone hired to destroy the employers building
How is agency authority created?
1- Appointment
2- Apparent authority / Estoppel (before the fact)
3- Emergency / Necessity (during the fact) (spouse admitting the other to the hospital)
4- Ratification (after the fact)
What are the two ways that appointment can take place? Define them.
- Express appointment: express agreement in words between principle and agent
- Implied appointment: words and/or conduct by the principle that reasonably implies IN THE MIND OF THE AGENT that there is an agency relationship
Define apparent Authority / Estoppel in the creation of agency authority.
Words and / or conduct by the principle that reasonably imply IN THE MIND OF A THIRD PARTY that there is an agency relationship
An agent with authority does not necessarily have all authority to act. What word represents the extent of authority?
scope
From least scope to most scope list the types of authority that can be granted…
Smallest: Express
- Implied
- Apparent
Biggest: Ratification of unauthorized acts
If an agent has the power to bind a principal he still may be liable. Why is this?
He may not have the “right” to bind
For the different types of authority below, for which does the agent have the right to bind? For which the power?
- Express
- Implied
- Apparent
- Ratification of unauthorized acts
- Express: both
- Implied: both
- Apparent: power only
- Ratification of unauthorized acts: both
What relationships do power and right focus on?
Power: Principal and 3rd party
Right: Principal and agent
Under which type of authority is the agent at risk of liability?
- apparent authority / estoppel
and
- ratification
What are the three levels of disclosure of a principal? Define.
1- Disclosed Principal : 3rd party knows agent is an agent and the principal the agent is working for
2- Partially disclosed Principal: 3rd party knows person is agent, but doesn’t know who for
3- Undisclosed Principal: 3rd party doesn’t know person is an agent
Concerning the liability of a principal to a 3rd party when is there liability with a simple contract?
How does the agents disclosure come into play?
If the agent had power to bind then there is liability
the level of disclosure is irrelevant