Agency Flashcards
Principal’s liability for torts committed by its agent
Principal will be liable for torts committed by its agent if there was a principal-agent relationship and the tort was committed by the agent within the scope of that relationship
Requirements of principle-agent relationship
1) assent-must be an informal agreement between the principal, who has capacity, and the agent
2) benefit-agent’s conduct must be for the principal’s benefit
3) control-principal must have the right to control the agent by having the power to supervise the manner of the agent’s performance
Liability for sub agents
Principal will be liable for a sub agent’s tort only if there was assent, benefit, and control between the principal and the sub agent tortfeasor.
Typically the principle does not assent to the sub agent’s help and does not have the right to control the sub agent. Therefore no vicarious liability.
Liability for borrowed agents
The principal will be liable for a borrowed agent’s tort only if there is assent, benefit, and control between the borrowing principal and the borrowed agent.
Typically the borrowing principle does not assume any right to control the borrowed agent. Therefore there is no vicarious liability for a borrowed agent’s tort.
Key distinction between an agent and an independent contractor
No right to control an independent contractor because there is no power to supervise the manner of its performance.
Therefore no vicarious liability for an independent contractor’s torts.
Exceptions for vicarious liability for independent contractors
1) independent contractor commits a tort while engaged in ultrahazardous or inherently dangerous activity
2) you hold out an independent contractor with the appearance of agency you will be estopped from claiming non-vicarious liability.
Test for determining whether within scope of principal agent relationship
1) was conduct within the job description (if so likely inside the scope)
2) frolic is a new and independent journey, therefore outside the scope of agency. Detour is a mere departure from an assigned task and therefore within the scope of agency.
3) if the agent, even in part, intended to benefit the principal, their actions are inside the scope of agency.
Vicarious liability for intentional towards
As a rule intentional towards are generally outside the scope of the agency-principal relationship.
Exceptions to the general rule for intentional torts
Intentional torts are within the scope if the conduct was:
1) authorized by the principal
2) natural from the nature of employment
3) motivated by desire to serve the principal
Liability of principal for contracts entered by agents
Principal is liable for contracts entered into by its agents only if the principal authorized the agent to enter the contract.
Four types of authority
1) actual express authority
2) actual implied authority
3) apparent authority
4) ratification
Actual express authority
Can be oral and even private.
If the contract itself must be in writing so must the express authority to enter into the contract.
Revocation of actual express authority
Express authority will be revoked by:
1) unilateral act of either the principal or the agent, or
2) death or incapacity of the principal.
Principal gives the agent a durable power of attorney actual express authority survives death or incapacity of the principal.
How to construe actual express authority
Actual express authority is narrowly tailored to the actual words used to express the authorization.
Actual implied authority
Authority which the principal gives the agent through conduct or circumstance taking one of the following forms; necessity, custom, prior acquiescence by the principal.