Agency Flashcards
Restatement 2nd of Agency, Section 1: 4 Elements
- Manifestation of Consent (assent) by Principal.
a) The Agent shall ACT on P’s behalf AND
b) The Agent shall be subject to P’s CONTROL - Consent (assent) by the Agent so to act for the Principal.
Teacher volunteers her car to her son’s coach to drive in Paris. Agency Relationship?
Gorton v. Doty
- Yes
- Doty (P) volunteered her car under the express condition the coach drive.
- Coach (A) consented by driving the car.
Restatement 2nd of Agency, Sections 15 & 16 (50-54)
It is not essential to the existence of authority that there be a K between P and A or that the agent promise to act as such.
R2A, S. 16 (p. 53)
It is not essential to the relationship of P and A that they, or either, receive compensation (for the relationship to exist).
R2A, S. 140: 4 Elements
- Creditor
- Who ASSUMES CONTROL
- of his debtor’s business
- RESULT: may become a PRINCIPAL w/ Liability for acts & transactions of debtor in connection w/ his business.
R2A, S. 140: 2 Comments
- “Merely EXERCISING VETO POWER by preventing purchases or sales above specified amounts does NOT thereby become a principal.”
- Creditor becomes a principal when it EXERCISES DE FACTO CONTROL over conduct of debtor.
R2A, S. 14K: 8 Elements
Agency v. Buyer-Supplier 1. One who CONTRACTS 2. To acquire PROPERTY 3. From a THIRD PERSON, AND 4. Convey it to another, AND 5. CONTRACTOR agreed that he is to a) ACT PRIMARILY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE OTHER AND b) NOT FOR HIMSELF 5. RESULT: is the AGENT of the other 3rd Party (Apple IPhone) --> S (supplier/At&t) --> B (buyer/Brooke)
R2A, S. 14K - Comment: 3 Factors indicating that one is a supplier and NOT an agent are:
- Receives FIXED PRICE for property no matter what price paid by him.
- Acts in OWN NAME and receives TITLE to property later transferred
- Has an INDEPENDENT BUSINESS in buyi8ng and selling similar property
a) Cargill, by its control and influence over Warren, became a principal with liability for the transactions entered into by its agent Warren
b) Cargill was an active participant in Warren’s operations RATHER than simply a financier
c) Cargill’s course of dealing with Warren was a paternalistic relationship in which Cargill made the key economic decisions and kept Warren in existence
Gay Jenson Farms Co. v. Cargill, Inc.
1. Holding: Cargill was a liable principal to Warren.
What are the 6 Attribution Rules?
- Actual - Express
- Actual - Implied/Incidental
- Apparent
- Inherent
- Estoppel
- Ratification
Joyce, the sole owner of 370 leasing co. (P), sued Ampex (D) for breach of K. D, through Kays, sent P a document with a signature block for both P and D to sign. P signed, D didn’t. Mueller, Ampex higher up over Kays, acknowledged there was an agreement in an intra-office memo.
a) P Arg: Offer to Sell
b) D’s Arg: Not offer to sell b/c Ampex did not sign P’s Counter: Offer to Purchase later accepted by Ampex Rep.
370 Leasing Corp. v. Ampex Corp. –> Apparent Authority
Bill Hogan hired his bro, Sam Hogan (P), to help paint the church. Sam fell and broke his arm and sued the church for workers comp. Sam had worked w/ Bill at the church prior times. A church elder told Bill he could hire another guy but he was hard to get ahold of and never discussed Sam.
a) Ruling 1 (Old Workers Comp. Board): For D, Sam not an employee of church
b) Ruling 2 (New Workers’ Comp. Board): For P, Sam is an employee of church
Mill Street Church v. Hogan –> Implied/Incidental Authority
R2A, S. 7 - Actual Authority (3 Elements)
- Power of A
- To affect legal relations with P
- Done in accordance with P’s manifestation of Consent to A
R2A, S. 26 - Creation of Actual Authority (3 Elements)
- Objective manifestation of P
- A’s reasonable interpretation of that manifestation
- A’s belief that she is authorized to act for P
R2A, S. 35 - When Incidental/Implied Authority is Inferred (6 Elements)
- Acts
- Which are incidental,
- Usually accompany, OR
- are reasonably necessary
- to accomplish a transaction.
- Fills the gaps in express authority
What fills in the gaps of express authority?
Incidental/Implied Authority
R2A, S. 8 & 27 - Apparent Authority; Creation of Apparent Authority (3 Elements)
- Objective manifestation from one party (apparent principal)
- Which reaches a 3rd Party
- Causing the 3rd Party to reasonably believe that another party (apparent agent) is authorized to act for the apparent principal
R3A, S. 2.03 - Apparent Authority (5 Elements)
- 3rd Party
- Reasonably believes
- Actor
- has authority to act on behalf of P AND
- that belief is traceable to P’s manifestations