Agency Flashcards
when does the principal become liable t the third party b/c of the actions of the agent? (2)
- the agent and the principal both consent
2. the agent is subject to the principal’s control
In an agent/principal relationship, who has to have capacity to contract?
the principal must have contractual capacity b/c the contract is really between him and the third party
agent does not have to have capacity to contract b/c he is just an intermediary
Does agency law req a contract to be in writing?
no, agency law doesn’t req one in particular
but SoF may apply (can’t be completed in a year, for real estate)
Is consideration required for an agency contract?
nope. not req
What kid of authority does the agent have to have at the time of the contract to be able to bind the principal to the contract?
(2 kinds)
Agent must have actual authority. either:
Express Actual Authority: principal tells agent to act on his behalf
Implied Actual Authority: endorsing agent’s behavior or prior acts so it leads a reasonable 3rd party to think it’s ok
Ways Actual Authority can terminate
- after a specified time/event
- change in circumstances (ex: sold the house)
- if agent acquires adverse interest
- when agent says so
- when principal says so (unless the agency has become coupled with an interest so it’s irrevocable)
- by death, incapacity, bankruptcy (unless coupled with interest to make it irrevocable
Agency Coupled with Interest
makes the agency irrevocable
not just saying that it’s irrevocable in the contract between agency and principle but the agency is created for the agents benefit
BUT a fee or commission is not considered an interest in agency
Is it ok if the agent delegates?
yes if the principal consents (express or implied
apparent authority
substitute for actual authority
when the principal leads a third party to mistakenly believe the agent has authority.
equitable doctrine to protect the innocent third party who has relied on P holding A out as agent
Key: reasonable belief must have been created by the P and not the A alone
how do you destroy apparent authority?
it can linger after actual authority ends so you have to go tell every third party who might believe he’s an agent
Ratification (3 ways)
3 req
even if agent had no authority to bind the P the P can bind the contract by
- expressly affirming
- accepting benefits
- suing the third party on it
requirements
- knowledge: P must have knowledge of all material facts
- all or nothing: must ratify it all
- capacity: P still must have had capacity at the time of ratification
Intervening Rights and Ratification
since ratification would be retroactive, protect the intervening rights of a BFP
Adoption of Contract
the P ca adopt the contract. it’s only forward looking, not retroactive like ratification
ex: a corp can’t ratify contracts made before it was formed, but it can adopt them
Since Agency if fiduciary relationship, what duties does A owe P?
what does the P owe the A?
- -duty of loyalty (put P’s interest above her own)
- -duty of care: sliding scale depending on any special skills A may have
- -Obedience
P to A:
- -pay him (unless it a gratuitous agency)
- -reimburse
- -indemnify
What is the Principal/Third Party Relationship?
assuming that the agent had actual authority or substitute
the principal is liable to the third party
the third party is nearly always liable to P
–not if agent has special skill and the P is undisclosed
(celebrity chef acting as agent for unknown chef ex)
what is the third party/agent relationship?
generally no liability since Agent is just a go between
unless the agent has an interest in the agency (typically no)
Tort Liability while in Agency
was the tort committed by a servant acting within the scope of his employment?
–if yes, the master and servant are jointly and severally liable (master can be indemnified)
Servant v. Independent Contract
the P is liable for the acts of the servant but not in the independent contractor
Scope of Employment and Tort Liability
detour v. frolic
Master is not automatically liable for all of the servant’s tort actions–only while acting in scope of employment
Detour: minor deviation is usually w/in the scope
Frolic: substantial deviation is usually outside the scope
Intentional Torts and Tort Liability with Agency
servant’s intentional torts are outside the scope unless:
–force is used to further the master’s business (bouncer)
–master ratifies the force
–master authorized servant to commit the tort
Releases of Liability
in texas, min rule, if third party releases master from liability servant is not automatically released
borrowed servant doctrine
Ex: F borrows B’s full time gardener and while working in F’s yard he negligently injures a person.
F is liable as the borrow-master if he had a legal right to control the gardener when accident happened
direct liability of Master
master is liable for he own negligence if he fails to properly train/supervise employees or check an employee’s criminal record or job history?