After the Revolution? 1660-1784 Flashcards
How did the role of the Nobility Change?
Originally, the European elite were men on horseback who dominated battles in the middle ages, this was undermined by the mil rev
This change led to the nobility organising a providing means of defence, per suiting careers as Corps Officers
Why did the change in war led to the change in nobility?
it became less seasonal, there was growth in standing armies which required more officers and equipment and supply was more expensive
Instead of merit and honour on the battlefield, what did Nobles seek to justify their status
Birth and Lineage Rights
What does Bush claim about the military position of nobles at this time?
- nobility did not lose their military position after 1700, but rather, they enhanced the role in different ways
- The expansion of armies and military organisations created a path for nobility to embrace new military careers and income.
What does Lynn argue about warfare in the ancien regime?
reflected the values and cultural assumptions of the social elites.
Give an example of the noble role in France:
France, the captains were responsible for providing horses and equipment; and in the eighteenth century, regiments were still property of the nobility.
Why did the role of the Knight decline?
- The importance of the cavalry eroded due to the role of the English Archer in the Hundred Years War and was destroyed by the gunpowder revolution.
- The cavalry was really only used to provide mass and shock against the enemy lines
In Spain, when was the role of the knight first seen to decline?
as early as 1492 in Spain and was formally abolished by Philip III in the early seventeenth century. The state required a professional, large-scale army.
Why did noble fortifications become a thing of the past?
the army required new defence works and equipment, and the cost of private fortifications was rising rapidly
Give an example of Noble Fortifications in France:
i. later sixteenth-century Wars of Religion had provided an opportunity for widespread improvements to existing defences
ii. when crown authority was restored under Louis XIII and Richelieu, they ordered for the the demolition of a number of castles and numerous smaller fortifications.
What did the disappearance of fortifications mean for noble revolt:
The disappearance of private forces and fortifications everywhere undermined the potential for noble violence and revolt.
How were the Nobility victims during this period?
- it seems that the institution of nobility was under attack
- often led to loses
3.state would utilize nobleman’s economic status - They lost a lot of political influence to the crown and its agents
in the1620s, what did Richelieu and Olivares say about the noble institution?
complained about the military incapacity and even disinclination of the French and Spanish elites, and sought to remedy the situation through education.
Why did the state utilising the nobility fortunes make them victums?
when food, equipment, and pay were not provided on time by central government departments, a noble officer was expected to make up the shortfall
Why were nobles benefactors of this change?
1.effective routes to promotion within the nobility
2.the financial rewards to accompany it.
3.adopted an army career as a form of self-legitimation
4. The Military Revolution theoretically transformed the army officer from freebooter into salaried state official.
5. they were poor and needed income
During the thirty years war, how were nobles promoted?
many successful military entrepreneurs were promoted in the nobility through the award of the higher titles of baron, count, and (very occasionally) prince.
When was the hierarchy of ranks introduced in France?
introduced in 1675 in France, offered at least the possibility of a career path and the financial rewards to accompany it
What is the danish example of why the nobility became officers?
The Danish nobility’s increased adoption of military careers during the seventeenth century has been attributed partly to the economic difficulties it experienced between 1580 and 1660.
Which country was seen as behind in the innovation of the military revolution?
Russia
Names the three phases of military revolution in Russia
- The first phase may be termed the Artillery Phase, Artillery played a decisive role in Muscovy’s expansion to the west and northwest.
- the appearance of the hand-held firearm, which characterised the second phase of reception. This demanded the participation in warfare of ever-increasing numbers of men, and simultaneously required improvements in military organisation and administration.
- Foreign Mercenary Phase; mercenaries became increasingly central to military development in seventeenth century Russia.
These were all seen before Peter the Greats reforms, however, the military organisation of Russia only really came into play under the reforms of Peter I
What was the introduced in 1705 in Russia
The new recruiting system launched in 1705, for example, strongly resembled Muscovite conscription; it also failed to deliver a reasonably predictable number of recruits until the 1720s.
Name some flaws of Russian reforms:
- caused issues for the mobilisation of the Russian state, soul tax affected peasants dearly
- the execution of Strel’sty 1698: group of musketeers who rose up against Peter I because he was introducing the progressive innovations. about 1,200 Streltsy were executed, and 600 were whipped, branded with iron, or sent into exile.
3.
Overall, what is the view of the military developments of Russia
Therefore, it can be seen that Russia failed to mobilise until much later than the rest of Europe, with many historians arguing for the backwardness of Russia.
Overall, why did the Seven Years War demonstrated that warfare was still ongoing after the Mil Rev?
It drove governments to adopt new politics and introduce fundamental reforms, and some states simulated opposition to political authority.