After Midterm Flashcards by Jamone Car

Rule 3.2

Expediting Litigation

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Expediting Litigation

Rule 3.2

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 3.2

A _______ shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client.

lawyer

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 3.2

A lawyer _______ make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client.

shall

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 3.2

A lawyer shall ______ _____ _______ to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client.

make reasonable efforts

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 3.2

A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to _______ _______ consistent with the interests of the client.

expeditie litigation

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 3.2

A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation _________ ______ the interests of the client.

consistent with

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 3.2

A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the ________ of the ______.

interests of the client

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

State Rule 3.2

A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client.

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 1.0(h): _________ or ________ when used in relation to conduct by a lawyer denotes the conduct of a reasonably prudent and competent lawyer.

reasonable or reasonably

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 1.0(h): Reasonable or reasonably ______ ____ ____ _____ to conduct by a lawyer denotes the conduct of a reasonably prudent and competent lawyer.

when used in relation

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 1.0(h): Reasonable or reasonably when used in relation to _______ ____ ____ ______ denotes the conduct of a reasonably prudent and competent lawyer.

conduct by a lawyer

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 1.0(h): Reasonable or reasonably when used in relation to conduct by a lawyer ______ ____ _______ of a reasonably prudent and competent lawyer.

denotes the conduct

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 1.0(h): Reasonable or reasonably when used in relation to conduct by a lawyer denotes the conduct of a __________ ________ and _______ _______.

reasonably prudent

competent lawyer

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

Rule 1.0(h): Reasonable or reasonably _________________________________________________.

when used in relation to conduct by a lawyer denotes the conduct of a reasonably prudent and competent lawyer.

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly

expedite litigation

advocates

Nor will a _________ to ________ be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose

failure

expedite

Nor will a failure to expedite be _________ if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose

reasonable

Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the ________ of __________ an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose

purpose of frustrating

Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an ________ ________ attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose

opposing party’s

Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s _______ ____ ______ rightful redress or repose

attempt to obtain

Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain ______ _______ or _______.

rightful redress or repose

Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar.

The _________ is ________ a competent lawyer acting in good faith would regard the course of action as having some substantial purpose other than delay. Realizing financial or other benefit from otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a legitimate interest of the client.

question is whether

Rule 3.2 – Comment 1: Dilatory practices bring the administration of justice into disrepute. Although there will be occasions when a lawyer may properly seek a postponement for personal reasons, it is not proper for a lawyer to routinely fail to expedite litigation solely for the convenience of the advocates. Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar. The question is whether a _______ _________ acting in good faith would regard the course of action as having some substantial purpose other than delay. Realizing financial or other benefit from otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a legitimate interest of the client.

competent lawyer

Rule 3.2 – Comment 1: Dilatory practices bring the administration of justice into disrepute. Although there will be occasions when a lawyer may properly seek a postponement for personal reasons, it is not proper for a lawyer to routinely fail to expedite litigation solely for the convenience of the advocates. Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar. The question is whether a competent lawyer ______ ___ _____ ______ would regard the course of action as having some substantial purpose other than delay. Realizing financial or other benefit from otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a legitimate interest of the client.

acting in good faith

Rule 3.2 – Comment 1: Dilatory practices bring the administration of justice into disrepute. Although there will be occasions when a lawyer may properly seek a postponement for personal reasons, it is not proper for a lawyer to routinely fail to expedite litigation solely for the convenience of the advocates. Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar. The question is whether a competent lawyer acting in good faith ______ ______ _____ _____ ___ _______ as having some substantial purpose other than delay. Realizing financial or other benefit from otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a legitimate interest of the client.

would regard the course of action

Rule 3.2 – Comment 1: Dilatory practices bring the administration of justice into disrepute. Although there will be occasions when a lawyer may properly seek a postponement for personal reasons, it is not proper for a lawyer to routinely fail to expedite litigation solely for the convenience of the advocates. Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar. The question is whether a competent lawyer acting in good faith would regard the course of action ______ ____ ______ ________ ________ other than delay. Realizing financial or other benefit from otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a legitimate interest of the client.

as having some substantial purpose

Rule 3.2 – Comment 1: Dilatory practices bring the administration of justice into disrepute. Although there will be occasions when a lawyer may properly seek a postponement for personal reasons, it is not proper for a lawyer to routinely fail to expedite litigation solely for the convenience of the advocates. Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar. The question is whether a competent lawyer acting in good faith would regard the course of action as having some substantial purpose _____ ____ ______. Realizing financial or other benefit from otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a legitimate interest of the client.

other than delay

Rule 3.2 – Comment 1: Dilatory practices bring the administration of justice into disrepute. Although there will be occasions when a lawyer may properly seek a postponement for personal reasons, it is not proper for a lawyer to routinely fail to expedite litigation solely for the convenience of the advocates. Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar. The question is whether a competent lawyer acting in good faith would regard the course of action as having some substantial purpose other than delay. _______ _______ or ______ ________ from otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a legitimate interest of the client.

realizing financial or other benefit

Rule 3.2 – Comment 1: Dilatory practices bring the administration of justice into disrepute. Although there will be occasions when a lawyer may properly seek a postponement for personal reasons, it is not proper for a lawyer to routinely fail to expedite litigation solely for the convenience of the advocates. Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar. The question is whether a competent lawyer acting in good faith would regard the course of action as having some substantial purpose other than delay. Realizing financial or other benefit from otherwise ________ _____ ____ ______ is not a legitimate interest of the client.

improper delay in litigation

Rule 3.2 – Comment 1: Dilatory practices bring the administration of justice into disrepute. Although there will be occasions when a lawyer may properly seek a postponement for personal reasons, it is not proper for a lawyer to routinely fail to expedite litigation solely for the convenience of the advocates. Nor will a failure to expedite be reasonable if done for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party’s attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar. The question is whether a competent lawyer acting in good faith would regard the course of action as having some substantial purpose other than delay. Realizing financial or other benefit from otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a __________ ________ of the ______.

legitimate interest client