Affirmative Defense and Privilage Flashcards
D may use force proportional to interest being protected and injury or harm threatened.
Factors to Consider:
Differences in size/strength
Character and reputation of attacker
Belligerence/Overt Act by attacker (more than mere words)
Threat of serious harm
Impossibility of retreat
Defense of Self
May only be used
To protect against serious bodily injury; or
Where statute permits such force
Use of Deadly Force
No duty to retreat rather than use non-deadly force
Duty to retreat rather than use deadly force unless
At home
At place of business
Statute otherwise provides
Duty to Retreat
P who provokes attack without justification may not rely on self-defense except:
Where confronted with excessive force in response
Where communicates intent to cease attack
Unlawful Provocation/Abandonment
D permitted to assert self-defense even if mistaken as long as mistake is reasonable.
Mistake
ictim’s may not rely on self-defense to get even
Retaliation
Generally, self-defense may be invoked only when harm appears imminent. But see Battered Spouse Syndrome.
Imminence:
Requires consideration of same factors as Defense of Self plus a reasonable belief that battery/assault was about to be committed by D on a third party and that third party could invoke self-defense
Mistake. Defense also applicable where a reasonable, but entirely mistaken belief
Defense of Others
Generally may use reasonable force to protect one’s personal property.
Use of force that will take human life or inflict great bodily injury is not permitted unless conduct threatens persons as well as property
May be governed by statute
Mistake:
A mistake as to the degree of force necessary does not destroy privilege
Mistake as to P’s rights to the property may destroy the privilege
Defense of Property
If P takes personal property by force, duress, or fraud, then D may use reasonable force to recapture property if
A demand for return precedes use of force
Recapture occurs in “hot pursuit”
Recapture is from P or third party having knowledge that property was wrongfully obtained
Mistake: D bears risk of mistake as to P’s right to take property
Recapture of Chattel
One who believes another has taken property from his premises or has failed to make payment for property purchased may detain such person for a reasonable period of time to investigate
May use reasonable force to detain but not for purposes of coercion of payment or confession as to theft
Detention for Investigation
D has right to use reasonable force to prevent or terminate P’s intrusion upon D’s land defense as long as
D reasonably believes intrusion may only be terminated by force
D first requests that D leave the premises unless such request would be useless
P’s purpose on the premises is not privileged
Defense of Land
In order to avert a disaster affecting public, D may interfere with P’s right of exclusive possession
Necessity must be imminent, extreme
Generally, public entrant is not liable for damages reasonable under the circumstances unless separate statute mandates payment
Available to both public officials and private citizens
Public Necessity
In order to protect D’s person or property, D may interfere with P’s exclusive right of possession of land or property.
BUT, D will be liable for any actual damages suffered by P.
BUT, P bears risk of mistake if as to privilege.
Private Necessity
Generally as a matter of public policy, P’s unlawful conduct will be a complete bar to recovery
Conduct must be prohibited and not merely regulated
Requires a knowing and intentional participation in a criminal act
Unlawful Conduct