AFFIRM Flashcards
AFFIRM Clinical Question
Among patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke or death, what are the effects of rate control versus rhythm control on mortality?
AFFIRM Bottom line
In patients with nonvalvular AF, there is no survival benefit between rate and rhythm control, but rhythm trends toward increased mortality.
AFFIRM rate control options
ß-blocker, calcium channel blocker and/or digoxin
AFFIRM design,
multi-center, parallel-group, randomized control trial, 4060 patients with non-valvular afib
AFFIRM median follow up
3.5 years
AFFIRM Primary outcome and analysis
All-cause mortality at 5 years, intention to treat
AFFIRM inclusion criteria
- Age ≥65 years with AF that was likely to be recurrent
- AF likely to cause illness or death for the participant
- Long-term treatment of AF was warranted
- Other risk factors for stroke or death
AFFIRM exclusion criteria
Contraindication to anticoagulation therapy
Ineligible to undergo trials of ≥2 medications in either treatment strategy
AFFIRM Rate control strategy goals
Therapeutic target for heart rate at rest (<80 bpm) and during activity (<110 bpm), which usually consisted of six-minute walk
AFFIRM Rhythm control strategy and meds
attempts to maintain sinus rhythm could include cardioversion as necessary.
class 1a(quinidine, procainamide, dispyrimidine) class,1c(flecainide, propafenone, moricizine), class 3(amidoerone, sotalol, dofetilide)
5 year mortality numbers
25.9% vs. 26.7% (HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.99-1.34; P=0.08)
which subgroups were associated with higher risk of death with rhythm control strategy
Older patients
Patients with CAD
Patients without HF
AFFIRM Criticisms
Not generalizable to younger patients or to patients without risk factors for stroke (i.e. patients with primary, or “lone”, AF), particularly those with paroxysmal AF.
There were more but card would be too long