AFC Flashcards
Explain what are transfer prices.
BUs are responsible for revenues and costs in their own unit, which means they have a high level of autonomy. In this sense, BUs are independent and can do transactions among each other: there
could be a BU selling one product or service to another one (which belongs to the same corporation). In other words, transfer pricing is a transaction that occur between two BU of the same company.
The transfer price is a “fictitious” price for evaluating intra-company exchanges, it is not a real price, but it is the fictitious price applied to a product or service of an internal transaction between two BUs belonging to the same corporation.
The transfer price is a cost to the receiving (downstream) division and a revenue to the supplying (upstream) division.
The transfer prices impact the performances of the division since it represents a cost and a revenue.
Once defined, transfer prices affect:
– Divisions performances
– Divisions decisions
– Company results
It affects the decisions of the business units, since they can decide to make the internal transaction or to buy the product from an external supplier, for this reason it affects the corporate overall results.
Talk about the CAPM.
The Capital Asset Pricing Model is a model that describes the relationship between the expected return and risk of investing in a security. It shows that the expected return of a security is equal to the risk free rate plus a risk premium which is based on a component of the equation called beta.
The equation that describes the CAPM model is composed basically of three elements:
- the risk free rate, which is typically a very safe government bond such as the German 10 year bond.
- the market return, which is the expected return of a fictitious portfolio containing all the stocks of a Stock Exchange.
- Finally, the levered beta, which defines the volatility of that of that security with respect to the movements of the market. This component is personal for the security and is affected by the capital structure of the firm. This way, the beta can define the risk level of the security.
CAPM = r.f. + bl * (r.m. - r.f.)
Moreover, the Beta, compared with the equity risk premium, shows the amount of compensation equity investors need for taking on additional risk.
What is Financial Leverage?
Leverage is an investment strategy of using borrowed money —specifically, the use of various financial instruments or borrowed capital—to increase the potential return of an investment.
Leverage can also refer to the amount of debt a firm uses to finance assets.
The use of leverage can multiply the potential returns from a project but, at the same time, leverage will also multiply the potential downside risk in case the investment does not pan out. When one refers to a company, property, or investment as “highly leveraged,” it means that item has more debt than equity.
Leverage amplifies the good or bad effects of the income generation and productivity of the assets in which we invest. Through this index we can understand if financial liabilities prevail over equity and resources. If it is higher than 1 the company uses more debt to finance assets and operations.
It indicates that the company is using motor debt to finance its asses and operations.
Talk about factoring.
It is a form of financing by which we engage with a company who buys our receivables.
The factor (a financial institution) pays a percentage to the counter party as soon as it receives an assignment or the receivable. Receivables are good since we leave the client the possibility to pay in future moment, but in terms of cash this might be problematic, especially if we cannot manage the networking cycle with our clients.
We have a debtor, a creditor and the factor. As a company, we have the right to have a credit which is related to the revenue we have postponed.
Sometimes we can decide to take the credit and ask to a factor to take charge of the receivables, the factor gives the amount of money to the company and goes to the debtor to ask for the money. However, there is a difference: the factor asks for a reduction of the credit (which is the fee), it actually gives 800 to the company which has to pay 200 for the fee, on the other side, the factor will receive the full amount of 1k by the debtor. The factoring agreement could be:
- with recourse: When the credit’s risk remain on the creditor (the company). The credit risk is on the creditor firm under reserve - i.e. the factor requires the return of anticipated amounts to the party who sells the credit in case the debtor does not fulfil its duties at maturity
- without recourse: the factor assumes all the risk. The factor assumes the credit risk. In this case, the factoring cost for the creditor is comprehensive of this risk analysis, and in the case of insolvency, the factor cannot recoup costs from the client who gives the credit. This arrangement is a protection against bad debt quality, even if it is not costless. In case of “recourse”, if our clients are not capable to give back the money the company has the risk; on the other side, “without recourse” implicates that the factor takes all the risk, if the client does not pay it is not a matter of the company anymore.
The factoring is a B2B contract. Why should I give my receivable to a factor in the first option? So that the risks remains to the company: We can have cash in the short term, but also, factors are better at getting receivables, they have more strategies into doing that; the factor is pushy in getting back the receivable.
Factoring is defined by a contract; it requires a lot of transparency. The cost is related to an advanced payment; we have cash but at the same time we have transaction cost and a reduction of the amount of money that we would receive with a normal receivable.
What is Relative Valuation?
Is used to determine a company’s value based on the market observation, by comparing a firm value to that of its competitors.
The company value depends on future returns (cash flows). The value is put in relation to some parameters which represent the proxies of future returns.
This method is also referred to as multiples methods: we compare our target company with another one with the same characteristics and the same value.
Steps for the relative valuation:
1st. - Identify the comparable companies:
Companies w/ cashflow, growth potential and risk similar to the firm being evaluated - not necessarily in the same industry/sector. Analysts however, usually define comparable company to be other firms in the same business - implicit assumption: firms in the same sector have similar ris, growth and cashflow profile.
Define the possible multiples:
Depends on which side we take - equity or asset side.
What is the WACC and what is the tax shield effect?
The WACC is composed of the cost of equity AND the cost of debt. The weighted average cost of capital is the cost of equity multiplied by the percentage that equity represents in the structure of the company plus the cost of debt multiplied by 1 minus the tc multiplied by the percentage of debt in the overall assets:
o WACC = KeE/D+E + KdD/D+E *(1-tc)
• (1-tc) is the tax shield effect: We use it in the part of debt of the company since the firm pays interests before paying taxes, so the financial interests are “diminishing” the amount of taxes; in this sense, the tax shield effect reduces the overall cost of debt that a company needs to carry, since by paying taxes we reduce the amount of money related.
➡️ If you have debt you don’t have to pay the taxes over them, so we need to reduce the amount of taxes we have.
What is the EVA?
EVA (Economic Value Added) represents the extra-profit from invested capital, measured with respect to the cost of capital required by investor
The formula of the EVA is:
EVA = after tax op. income - [WACC* (total asset - current liabilities)]
In general cases, the application of the EVA methodology to projects evaluation provides the same result as the NPV method
EVA highlights how a value-based management should be oriented to:
1) improve the operating margin, by reducing costs and increasing revenues;
2) reduce the invested capital, and improving its productivity;
3) reduce the cost of capital, through financial management
The amended EVA:
⏩ Like the R.I, the EVA is based on the assumption that absolute indicators are better than relative ones.
⏩ With this rationale, EVA should result in a more precise and reliable measure of a company’s profitability in the log run.
⏩ The EVA charges managers for the cost of their investment (like the RI).
⏩ Value is created only if after-tax operating income > cost of invested capital.
To improve EVA:
🟢 earn more after-tax income (w/ the same capital)
🟢 use less capital to earn the same after tax op. income
🟢 invest additional capital in high return projects with ROI or IRR > WACC).
What is the difference between bank debt and syndicated bank debt?
A bank loan is a debt provided by a bank to the company, it can be both long and short term, the capital provided is in return of an interest. The interests can be fixed or can be floating (variable). The maturity expresses the number of periods of duration of the bank loan, which is agreed between the company and the bank. The repayment scheme (repayment of the capital) can be bullet, that is, that we give back the money at the maturity day or amortized, for which the repayment is spread across years. Of course, debtholders have priority over equity holders.
A syndicated loan is provided by a group of lenders. It is structured, arranged, and administered by one or several commercial or investment banks known as arrangers. The aim is to lend money to a borrower with a unique contract. This allows the partition of credit that a stand-alone bank could not disburse. The syndicated bank loan is a specific type of bank loan, the company asks money to financial institutions but the amount of money we ask is so big that we need a pool of banks: We need more than one bank that provides altogether the required amount.
These loans are usually related to big merger and acquisition. In the case of syndicated bank loan we need a more complicated and more complex arrangement since we need more banks to lend the money, because of this, we need an intermediary institution which becomes an aggregator between the banks and the company.
What are dual transfer prices?
Dual transfer refers to the fact that we have two different prices whose difference is compensated by a cost sustained by the corporation accounted in the balance sheet as a reserve (namely, in the risk reserve). This means that the difference between the two prices is compensated by an investment the corporate made. So, under a dual transfer pricing scheme:
• the selling price received by the upstream division differs from the purchase price paid by the downstream division.
• the difference between the two values is compensated by corporate account.
➡️ It highlights the cost for the corporate to have a strategic BU.
Explain how to do Consolidation of Financial Statements and the Line by Line method.
Line by line method:
Applied on subsidiaries, the implemention has 3 steps:
1️⃣ We have to combine all the items of the Balance Sheet and the Income Statement
2️⃣ We eliminate all the intra-group transactions (transactions between the companies the compose the group)
3️⃣ Finally, we eliminate the parent’s investment in the subsidiaries, the parent’s portion or equity, which may cause the goodwill to arise.
🟠 Goodwill is the difference between the book value of the investment and the fair value.
Explain the procedure for the consolidation method in the case of Associated companies.
In this case, the Equity method is used, not the line by line method, as these equities are considered an asset for the company. The associate company’s net income increases the value of the investment pro quota and the dividends decreases the investor’s value pro quota.
Talk about the Net Financial Position.
The NFP is expressed by the financial liabilities minus the cash and cash equivalent. It summarises the level of indebtedness towards borrowers of financial resource to the firm.
What is the NWC?
The NWC is equal to the difference between the company’s current assets and liabilities. It can indicate its ability of he firm to pay short term debt. The problem with the NWC is that it can be a positive or a negative valued preliminary observation may appear positive as the unity is able to meet short term obligation by liquidation operating assets. However, we should pay attention on the assets included in the NWC.
We can improve the NWC without actually using cash by:
reducing the DSO, increasing DPO, enhancing the production lead time.
What are the rules for consolidated financial statements
We must start by defining the relation between the parent company and the controlled companies. In the case of subsidiaries, the parent company must simultaneously meet 3 criteria:
1️⃣ regards the power over the controlled company - the parent company must own at least 50% of the shares of the subsidiary or even less in some cases if the other half is owned my a minority that owns shares and that does not constitute power over the parent.ù
2️⃣ The parent company must be exposed to the risks of the subsidiary
3️⃣ The parent company must have the power over strategic decisions of the subsidiary, being able to influence the possible returns of it.
After having identified the subsidiary, the p net step is to adjust the financial statements of the subsidiar to the standard equipped by the parent company, which includes:
1️⃣ The report date - subsidiaries have to produce an interim report at the parents fiscal closing date.
2️⃣ The accounting standard should be harmonised - If the parent uses US GAAP, the controlled company should apply the same accounting standard
3️⃣ Finally, the currency of the controlled company should be adjusted to he one used by the parent company.
What are the contrasts between Residual Income X ROI?
First, the Residual Income can be expressed as:
Operating Profit - k*Invested Capital
Th ROI can be expressed as:
Operating Profit / Total Assets - Non Financial Liabilities
The problem with the ROI is that you can act both on the numerator and the denominator to manipulate it and this may lead to wrong interpretations of financial results especially in the short term. For example, an increase the ROI without an effective increase in revenue or operating profit might suggest that a firm is actually getting rid of assets, which can be a positive or a negative thing.
It is a positive thing if you are eliminating redundant or useless assets, but a bad thing if you end up eliminating an asset that that could be better exploited. Redundant assets can also be important to run activities in an effective and resilient way and its disposal may lead to a reduction of safety stocks, redundant capacity or sale of backup machinery and equipment.
In order to solve this so-called “denominator issue” and also take into account the cost os capital, innovative financial accounting indicators were developed such as the Residual Income.
Differently from the ROI, the Residual Income is an absolute indicator. It can be calculated by subtracting the cost of capital multiplied by the invested capital from the operating profit. Through this indicator we try to understand what is the return that I need to guarantee to the shareholders. Through this indicator we try to understand what is the return that I need to guarantee to the shareholders. The Residual income, takes into consideration the cost of capital.