Ae Qs Flashcards
Who lives/utilizes the platform where?
AEs–actions feed, interactive reports (opps)
BDRs–actions feed, interactive reports
CS–actions feed, interactive reports
Execs–interactive and reports
What’s CAC and how do we do it?
Customer acquisition cost, and no. Most of the finance data lives outside of SF and that’s why we can’t do it.
How hefty is your implementation?
That can either mean from a bandwidth perspective or a technical on? Its usually 8ish weeks, with some leeway. What are the factors?
Implementations take resources. We can also have a call with an implementation lead here, to talk you through it if you’d like
How are we different from gates in SF
sometimes they are error prone if you are trying to go back and forth and that’s frustrating. Or for things like close date is in the past, you could create an exception report, but then someone’s looking at that every day and are you reps using it? Plus, ours is real time data, where as exception support might be once a day.
Our data lake
We are now a data lake architecture, the AWS. So the data isn’t silod its all floating together. Which means we can handle two SF instances at one org. Look across objects, leads, opps, etc.
In Sf, you know what answer you want, then you build your way there–won’t be storing data you don’t need at the moment
Data lakes store all the data and all the changes, so when you come back with a new question, you have the data to get the answer, there’s no need for more data.
Our ASM story
100 activities, 5 meetings=winning deal. Mile markers–decision maker involved by 3rd meeting, 2 meetings occur with 3rd scheduled within first 15 days. These are our key inflection points. We use this to coach by reviewing the deals that are forecasted but only has 50 touches, is this going to win? Lets talk about it, should it be in commit?
Elevator pitch
we are a revenue intelligence platform working across marketing, sale and CS, from data capture, to guided selling, to forecasting, to exec and management reporting that most know us for.
We have a lot of pieces so we can probably solve what you are looking for.
How do I make dashboards and reports
we have a bunch of these dashboards pre-built with the most common metrics and views of the data. But this is a very flexible platform. Basically any way you want to depict the data and how you have things arranged in SF is what is important. If you have some super specific reports you are looking to see, we can set up some time with a SE to go through those examples. Report and dashboard training is all part of onboarding and continued success with our CSM team.
How though–go to pipeline, pick a report, edit, toggle things on and off and update in real time, add or subtract, add to dashboard
Why do we have CI?
Sales managers don’t have time to listen to every call and audit them,
Ties nicely with forecast and funnel reviews to go one step deeper into the information.
How do we help with coaching in CI
how do we focus our time? Go to on demand screen. Use this left hand navigator. See a specific customer, team member, a topic like a competitor, see how far in the sales process they are. You can save these searches to see all calls in that saved search.
CI–us vs. chorus
chorus is hard to find a snippet, we can click and drag and hit share. Chorus doesn’t have other languages or accents–unreadable.
We don’t have individual coaching stats (employee score card), like how I compare to others in the team YET. It’ll be in the platform so individuals will have a dashboard with this data in there, next to pipeline progression say.
We make data actionable
They don’t have reporting
better than gong at putting data in SF
CI–us vs. gong
has more features than us, but we the essentials like recordings, sharability, track themes/key words, transcriptions. Ours isn’t silod. The data should be in all other parts of the business. We use the CI to feed into our machine learning and reports across all the functions
BAA we don’t–means you are hippa compliant which is for conversational important.
They do POCs
They have activity data, email data, conversational data,
Silod data–they put the information in a custom object, but its not usable.
We have a broader scope–so we have all the overlays, the full picture.
Ci–call scoring
Not like, yes that was 98% of a good call–but we can pull these engagement metrics. Like talk time, speed, etc.
What is something chorus can do that we can’t?
creating a new topic is a support request not like chorus where you can easily make it yourself. We’’ll have it soon.
Is our data good enough?
how many customers do you have?
true, reporting is only as good as the data. 1. We have API connections to give you a fuller data set Initially. We’ll be pulling 15 months of data to populate that. But we make sure you keep data clean going forward because its never a 1 time thing. There’s always more to do.
How has this changed workflows?
same workflow but data is automatically captured, biggest change is for updating notes and opps, shifted the dynamic of a deal review. Old world, 10 mins on why things are going well and they’re placed correctly. Now, director has all the info so doesn’t need an update but gives coaching and assistance.
Us Vs. Clari
- Clari is a very robust reporting tool, and as a revops platform forecasting and incorporating ML is part of our functionality, but we cover the entire GTM team from your lead gen team (conversions, activities to convert leads), sales team (activity, coaching, pipeline management, forecasting, board level reporting), to CSM team (upsell/cross-sell, churn risk)
- We report across data silos and write that data back to Salesforce so you are in control of your data and can dictate where and how you use it
- Philosophically our approach is to help you understandthe moving pieces that produce the end result to make improvements at the micro level, a groundup approach vs. a tops down result
we want to show you the data behind the CTC, if its high or low, why? If its changed why? If its low, how can we improve our chances? one contact, we don’t have a DM, etc.
Clari gets you a number but we help you impact that number
more breadth, marketing, cs etc.
we have more data
reporting is limited, its inflexible–need their team to make changes, we can let you do your own things
you want to split out ML models by teams etc.
Us vs. BI
You could probably build everything out eventually, but it takes a lot longer. Its rare to see execs really using the functionality of a BI tool or build any reports.
Us vs. Groove
We do the activity capture, but we are not a cadencing tool.
Also we include all the overlays, so not just sales reps directly
Troops.ai
Guided selling competitor
Atrium
reporting and analyitcs
How to you know where a contact is?
we match the email domain
Why do marketers love our activity capure?
Because often times those contacts aren’t in the CRM and we’ll create them
How is our activity capture different?
Ability to capture mobile data–like if you send an email from your phone vs. outreach it wouldn’t log previously.
Any overlays like CROs, SEs etc.