Advocacy Flashcards

1
Q

Advocacy - assessment overview

A

45 min prepare
15 min deliver
Day 1 DR. Day 2 CL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Advocacy -
how prepare

A
  1. Read through instructions
  2. Write out points to cover
  3. Identify and note legal test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Assessment criteria

A

Appropriate lang and behaviour
Clear and logical structure
Engages with court appropriately
Persuasive arguments
Include all key facts
Graded on legal content - legally correct and comprehensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Test for summary judgment by claimant

A

Defence has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason the case should proceed to trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Application to exclude a confession

A

Exclude confessions under s76 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, if certain conditions satisfied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

State who address court in civil and criminal courts

A

Civil - master in high court or district judge in county court

Criminal - district judge in magistrates’ court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How to address the judge - civil

Written title, court, type of judge, mode of address

A

Civil:
Hill J, High Court, Judge, My Lord/Lady
*HC judge is known as My Lord/Lady

Master Hill, High Court, Master, Judge
*HC Master is known as judge

HHJ Hill, High Court or County Court, Circuit Judge in chambers, Your Honour
*Circuit judge - Your Honour

DJ Hill, County Court, District Judge, Judge
*District judge - Judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How to address the judge - criminal

Written title, court, type of judge, mode of address

A

HHJ Allen, Crown Court, Circuit Judge or Recorder, Your Honour
*Circuit Judge/recorder - Your Honour

DJ Allen Mrs Allen, Magistrates’ Court, District Judge or Lay Magistrate, Judge or Your Worship
*District Judge/Lay Magistrate - Judge or Your worship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How to structure advocacy

A
  1. Start by starting application you have been asked to make
  2. Include brief summary of backgrounds facts
  3. Facts set out in papers
  4. Present each of substantive points with supporting evidence
  5. Outline each of those reasons and ensure take judge tot the relevant evidence to support each of those reasons
  6. Outline the relevant law
  7. Ask court to grant application
  8. Be prepared in civil to address legal costs and questions from judge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Include all relevant facts

A

Write down decision want judge to make
Reason why correct decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DR - 11 tests

A
  1. Summary judgment
  2. Set aside default judgment
  3. Security for costs
  4. Interim prohibitory injunction
  5. Directions
  6. Unless order
  7. Strike out
  8. Relief from sanctions
  9. Adjournment or stay of proceedings
  10. Track allocation hearing
  11. Interim payment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DR - summary judgment*

A

Discretionary power. C or D
1) No real prospect of successfully succeed/defend claim or issue
2) No other reason case/issue should be disposed at trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DR - setting aside default judgment*

A

Mandatory power if judgment wrongly entered. Only D.

Discretionary
1) Real prospect of successfully defending claim
2) Some other good reason why judgment should be set aside/ D defend claim

Court consider whether set aside DJ promptly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DR - security of costs

A

Discretionary power if app show 1 or more grounds. Only D.
C resident outside jurisdiction *not in Brussels contracting state
-is company or other body there
-is reason believe unable to pay D’s costs if ordered
-changed address since claim started with view to evading consequences litigation
-failed to provide address or gave incorrect address
-is acting as nominal claimant and reason not pay costs
-taken steps in relation to assets make difficult to enforce order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

DR - interim prohibitory injunction

A

Discretionary power. App show:
-Serious Q to be tried
-Damages would not be adequate remedy for loss
-Balance of convenience lies in favour of injunction
-Offer cross undertaking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

DR - directions

A

C or D.
Court power to make or vary directions further to general case powers.
Justify directions by ref to relevant CPR governing action
e.g.
CPR 31 - disclosure - if C wish restrict scope of search
CPR 35 - expert evidence

Overriding obj - deal w/ cases justly and proportionately

17
Q

DR - unless order

A

Discretionary. C or D:
-Other party breach of court order
-Complied with order
-Order interest of overriding objective to enforce court orders and deal with cases fairly, justly, proportionate costs

18
Q

DR - strike out

A

Discretionary. C or D.
-Statement of case disclosures no reasonable grounds for brining or defending claim
-Claim or defence is abuse of process
-Failure to comply with court order, procedural rule, payment of court fees

19
Q

DR - relief from sanctions

A

e.g. claim/defence struck out for non-compliance with rule/ practice direction/ court order/ financial sanctions of non-payment fees

C or D.

Court consider all circumstances of case to enable deal justly
-Litigation efficiently and at proportionate cost
-Enforce compliance w/ rules, practice, directions and orders

Case law provides guidance how court approach 3-stage approach
1. Seriousness of non-compliance
2. Why non-compliance occurred
3. All circumstances to deal proportionately, efficiently, enforce compliance

20
Q

DR - adjournment or stay of proceedings

A

Discretionary. C or D.

-Overriding obj - fairly, justly, proportionate costs
-Show why interest in overriding obj
-Prompt app after need for adjournment

21
Q

DR - track allocation hearing

A

Discretionary. C or D.
-Set out facts of case
-Refer to factors considered in track allocation (value of claim, involve protected party or PI, is claim complex - subj matter or evidential issues)
-Conclude with track recommendation

22
Q

DR - interim payment

A

DIscretionary. C only.

  1. D filed AOS (acknowledgment of service)
  2. Establish 1 condition met
    a. D admitted liability
    b. C obtained judgment against D
    c. if claim trial, C would obtain judgment for substantial amount of money against D
    d. specific conditions for order of possession of land
    e. 2+ D following conditions are satisfied
    i) court satisfied C obtain judgment for substantial amount against at least one of D
    ii) all D either insured/ liability met under Motor Insurers Bureau Agreement/ D is public body
  3. Explain interim payment used for
  4. Request specific sum for interim payment or instalment payment
  5. Demonstrate sum request reasonable proportion of likely damages
  6. Address court contributory negligence and relevant set off or counterclaim
23
Q

CL - 10 tests

A
  1. Visual identification evidence - poor quality
  2. Visual identification evidence - improperly obtained
  3. Exclusion of confession
  4. Exclusion of any evidence
  5. Admissibility of hearsay evidence
  6. Admissibility of D’s bad character
  7. Bail application
  8. Plea in mitigation
  9. Submission of no case to answer
  10. Mode of trial - argue court accept jurisdiction
24
Q

CL - visual ID evidence - poor quality

A
  1. Identify court discretion exclude evidence under s78 PACE
  2. Identify what other evidence support prosecution
  3. Argue for/against strength through
    -Amount of time
    -Distance
    -Visibility
    -Obstruction
    -Known
    -Any reason to remember
    -Time lapse
    -Errors
25
CL - visual ID evidence - improperly obtained
1. Identify court discretion exclude evidence under s78 PACE 2. Identify relevant breaches of ID procedure under Code D, incl: -Take into account reasonable obj to appearance of others in ID procedure -Keep witness away from suspect before and during procedure -Keep witness apart during procedure -Warning suspect might not be shown at all
26
CL - exclusion of confession
1. Remind court admissibility challenged - prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that confession not unreliable 2. Confession must be excluded if prosecution do not discharge burden of proof under s76 PACE 3. Identify confession relevant to mater in issue between prosecution and defence, therefore admissible 4. Identify which ground confession sought to be excluded and provide details (unreliability things said/done/oppression) 5. Demonstrate causation from things said/done/oppression to confession
27
CL - exclusion of any evidence
Court general discretion exclude prosecution evidence if regard all circumstances in which evidence obtained, admission of evidence have adverse effect on fairness of proceedings that the court ought not to admit under s78 PACE *Alternative/additional argument, in conjunction or stand-alone
28
*CL - Admissibility of hearsay evidence
1. Identify single or multiple 2. Single - identify hearsay inadmissible unless exceptions apply -statute -rule of law -agreement of parties -interest of justice 3. multiple - business doc, consistency, all parties agree, value evidence so high - interest of justice 4. apply test from relevant exception
29
*CL - Admissibility of D's bad character evidence
1. Evidence of misconduct, commission of offences, other reprehensible behaviour (if yes, not admissible UNLESS) 2. 7 gateways: -All parties agree admissible -Adduced by D -Important explanatory evidence -Relevant to important matter in issue between prosecution and defence -Substantive probative value to important matter in issue between co-defendants -Corrects false impression given by D -D attacks another's character 3. If above important matter of attack another character, then court must not admit if D make app to court that admit evidence have adverse effect on fairness of proceedings that court must admit
30
*CL - bail application
*Rules of evidence do not apply as strictly as bail 1. Remind court of D's right to bail - bail refused if one of exceptions to right to bail apply AND real prospect of custodial sentence 2. Consider whether any exceptions to right to bail apply - usually substantial grounds to fear D would fail to surrender, commit further on bail or interfere with witnesses or otherwise obstruct justice 3. Review factors deciding whether substantial grounds exist - nature and seriousness of offence, D's character, D's record of complying with conditions on bail, strength of evidence 4. Consider whether conditions can put forward to address these issues: residence, reporting, exclusion, non-contact tag, curfew 5. Consider why bail should/should not be granted
31
CL - plea in mitigation
1. Remind court sentence proportionate to seriousness of offence, bear in mind offender's culpability and potential harm 2. Identify starting point for sentence and range available 3. Consider aggravating and mitigating factors 4. Multiple offences - explain why sentences should be concurrent 5. Consider mitigating factors relating to offender 6. Remind court of credit for guilty plea 7. Propose appropriate sentence
32
CL - submission of no case to answer
Remind court burden on prosecution to prove D's guilt Prove all elements of offence made out Argue evidence prosecution adduced insufficient for any reasonable court to convict, either because prosecution failed to prove element of offence OR because evidence adduced by prosecution is manifestly unreliable that no reasonable court could convict on it
33
CL - mode of trial - argue court should accept jurisdiction
Court consider adequacy of sentencing powers Mag Court restricted 6 month imprisonment for single offence 12 month for 2 or more either way offences Sentencing guidelines Consider starting point and range Submit court sentencing powers adequate and should accept jurisdiction