Advocacy Flashcards
Advocacy - assessment overview
45 min prepare
15 min deliver
Day 1 DR. Day 2 CL
Advocacy -
how prepare
- Read through instructions
- Write out points to cover
- Identify and note legal test
Assessment criteria
Appropriate lang and behaviour
Clear and logical structure
Engages with court appropriately
Persuasive arguments
Include all key facts
Graded on legal content - legally correct and comprehensive
Test for summary judgment by claimant
Defence has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason the case should proceed to trial
Application to exclude a confession
Exclude confessions under s76 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, if certain conditions satisfied
State who address court in civil and criminal courts
Civil - master in high court or district judge in county court
Criminal - district judge in magistrates’ court
How to address the judge - civil
Written title, court, type of judge, mode of address
Civil:
Hill J, High Court, Judge, My Lord/Lady
*HC judge is known as My Lord/Lady
Master Hill, High Court, Master, Judge
*HC Master is known as judge
HHJ Hill, High Court or County Court, Circuit Judge in chambers, Your Honour
*Circuit judge - Your Honour
DJ Hill, County Court, District Judge, Judge
*District judge - Judge
How to address the judge - criminal
Written title, court, type of judge, mode of address
HHJ Allen, Crown Court, Circuit Judge or Recorder, Your Honour
*Circuit Judge/recorder - Your Honour
DJ Allen Mrs Allen, Magistrates’ Court, District Judge or Lay Magistrate, Judge or Your Worship
*District Judge/Lay Magistrate - Judge or Your worship
How to structure advocacy
- Start by starting application you have been asked to make
- Include brief summary of backgrounds facts
- Facts set out in papers
- Present each of substantive points with supporting evidence
- Outline each of those reasons and ensure take judge tot the relevant evidence to support each of those reasons
- Outline the relevant law
- Ask court to grant application
- Be prepared in civil to address legal costs and questions from judge
Include all relevant facts
Write down decision want judge to make
Reason why correct decision
DR - 11 tests
- Summary judgment
- Set aside default judgment
- Security for costs
- Interim prohibitory injunction
- Directions
- Unless order
- Strike out
- Relief from sanctions
- Adjournment or stay of proceedings
- Track allocation hearing
- Interim payment
DR - summary judgment*
Discretionary power. C or D
1) No real prospect of successfully succeed/defend claim or issue
2) No other reason case/issue should be disposed at trial
DR - setting aside default judgment*
Mandatory power if judgment wrongly entered. Only D.
Discretionary
1) Real prospect of successfully defending claim
2) Some other good reason why judgment should be set aside/ D defend claim
Court consider whether set aside DJ promptly
DR - security of costs
Discretionary power if app show 1 or more grounds. Only D.
C resident outside jurisdiction *not in Brussels contracting state
-is company or other body there
-is reason believe unable to pay D’s costs if ordered
-changed address since claim started with view to evading consequences litigation
-failed to provide address or gave incorrect address
-is acting as nominal claimant and reason not pay costs
-taken steps in relation to assets make difficult to enforce order
DR - interim prohibitory injunction
Discretionary power. App show:
-Serious Q to be tried
-Damages would not be adequate remedy for loss
-Balance of convenience lies in favour of injunction
-Offer cross undertaking
DR - directions
C or D.
Court power to make or vary directions further to general case powers.
Justify directions by ref to relevant CPR governing action
e.g.
CPR 31 - disclosure - if C wish restrict scope of search
CPR 35 - expert evidence
Overriding obj - deal w/ cases justly and proportionately
DR - unless order
Discretionary. C or D:
-Other party breach of court order
-Complied with order
-Order interest of overriding objective to enforce court orders and deal with cases fairly, justly, proportionate costs
DR - strike out
Discretionary. C or D.
-Statement of case disclosures no reasonable grounds for brining or defending claim
-Claim or defence is abuse of process
-Failure to comply with court order, procedural rule, payment of court fees
DR - relief from sanctions
e.g. claim/defence struck out for non-compliance with rule/ practice direction/ court order/ financial sanctions of non-payment fees
C or D.
Court consider all circumstances of case to enable deal justly
-Litigation efficiently and at proportionate cost
-Enforce compliance w/ rules, practice, directions and orders
Case law provides guidance how court approach 3-stage approach
1. Seriousness of non-compliance
2. Why non-compliance occurred
3. All circumstances to deal proportionately, efficiently, enforce compliance
DR - adjournment or stay of proceedings
Discretionary. C or D.
-Overriding obj - fairly, justly, proportionate costs
-Show why interest in overriding obj
-Prompt app after need for adjournment
DR - track allocation hearing
Discretionary. C or D.
-Set out facts of case
-Refer to factors considered in track allocation (value of claim, involve protected party or PI, is claim complex - subj matter or evidential issues)
-Conclude with track recommendation
DR - interim payment
DIscretionary. C only.
- D filed AOS (acknowledgment of service)
- Establish 1 condition met
a. D admitted liability
b. C obtained judgment against D
c. if claim trial, C would obtain judgment for substantial amount of money against D
d. specific conditions for order of possession of land
e. 2+ D following conditions are satisfied
i) court satisfied C obtain judgment for substantial amount against at least one of D
ii) all D either insured/ liability met under Motor Insurers Bureau Agreement/ D is public body - Explain interim payment used for
- Request specific sum for interim payment or instalment payment
- Demonstrate sum request reasonable proportion of likely damages
- Address court contributory negligence and relevant set off or counterclaim
CL - 10 tests
- Visual identification evidence - poor quality
- Visual identification evidence - improperly obtained
- Exclusion of confession
- Exclusion of any evidence
- Admissibility of hearsay evidence
- Admissibility of D’s bad character
- Bail application
- Plea in mitigation
- Submission of no case to answer
- Mode of trial - argue court accept jurisdiction
CL - visual ID evidence - poor quality
- Identify court discretion exclude evidence under s78 PACE
- Identify what other evidence support prosecution
- Argue for/against strength through
-Amount of time
-Distance
-Visibility
-Obstruction
-Known
-Any reason to remember
-Time lapse
-Errors