Adverse Possession Flashcards

1
Q

Statute of Limitations Act

A

1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

No action to recover land brought not by a state body after the expiration of 12 years

A

s13(2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

State solicitor is not a state body

A

O’Hagan v Grogan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Could leave no doubt in the mind of a landowner that occupation adverse to his title was taking place

A

Doyle v O’Neill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Doyle v O’Neill

A

Could leave no doubt in the mind of a landowner that occupation adverse to his title was taking place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Adverse possession starts

A

when the adverse possessor occupies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the title extinguished can be

A

no greater than the title of the paper owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Factual possession signifies an appropriate degree of physical control

A

Powel v McFarlane

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Powel v McFarlane

A

Factual possession signifies an appropriate degree of physical control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

minimal acts continue possession

A

Dunne v Iarnród Éireann 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dunne v Iarnród Éireann 2007

A

minimal acts continue possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Dunne v Iarnród Éireann 2007 judge

A

Clarke J

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

once the title is extinguished, no subsequent act of possession can be re-instated

A

Dunne v Iarnród Éireann 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sporadic visits to the property where not enough for adverse possession

A

Dunne v Iarnród Éireann 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Back garden - not sporadic visits

A

Byrne v Dublin City Council 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

if true owner does nothing to interrupt possession title is extinguished

A

Hamilton v ACC Loan Management 2018

17
Q

Paper owner walked the land

A

Brown v Fahey

18
Q

visited the property several times a year

A

Mulhern v Brady

19
Q

brought auctioneer to the property

A

Moley v Fee

20
Q

serving a letter but never entering the property is not sufficient to disturb period of adverse possession

A

Mahon v O’Reilly

21
Q

Permitted to graze cattle

A

Brown v Fahey 1975

22
Q

possession with consent/ license of the owner

A

Hughes v Griffin

23
Q

permission to live in the house - implied license

A

A v C 2007

24
Q

Animus possidendi is possession inconsistent with the title and the inconsistency involves an intention to exclude

A

Murphy v Murphy 1980

25
Q

Murphy v Murphy 1980

A

Animus possidendi is possession inconsistent with the title and the inconsistency involves an intention to exclude

26
Q

Feehan v Leamy 2000 judge

A

Finnegan J

27
Q

‘an intention to preclude the true owner and all other persons from enjoyment of the estate’

A

Feehan v Leamy 2000

28
Q

Feehan v Leamy 2000

A

an intention to preclude the true owner and all other persons from enjoyment of the estate’

29
Q

found there was no intention to exclude

A

Dundalk UDC v Coleman

30
Q

there must be clear and affirmative evidence that the trespasser had intention to possess and made such intention clear to the world

A

Powell v McFarlane 1979

31
Q

Powell v McFarlane 1979

A

there must be clear and affirmative evidence that the trespasser had intention to possess and made such intention clear to the world

32
Q

fence needs to exclude all others

A

Tracey Enterprises McAdam Ltd v Dury 2006

33
Q

occasional visitors- no intention to exclude

A

Griffen v Bleithin 1999

34
Q

acts must be adverse to the owners future use

A

Leigh v Jack
Cork Corp v Lynch

35
Q

Future use taken into account when considering animus possidendi

A

Durack Manufacturing v Considine

36
Q

Defences

A

Acknowledgement
Fraud
Disability

37
Q

Acknowledgement

A

Edington v Clarke
in comparison to..
Ofulue v Bassert (without prejudice basis)

38
Q

Fraud

A

s71(1) 1957 Act

39
Q

Disability

A

s49 1957 Act