Adult Uro Oncology Flashcards
<p>ProtecT trial</p>
<p>Randomized 1,643 men with screen-detected PCa to active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, or radiation therapy with curative intent. At a median of 10 years, no differences in PCa mortality were observed across groups (PCa deaths per 1,000 person years: active monitoring 1.5, surgery 0.9, radiation 0.7, p = 0.48).</p>
<p>PIVOT trial</p>
<p>The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) found that radical prostatectomy did not improve overall or disease-specific mortality at a median follow-up of 12.7 years.1,3 However, surgery reduced the risk of progression (40.9% vs 68.4%; HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.32-0.48) and treatment for progression (33.5% vs 59.7%; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.36-0.56) compared to watchful waiting.</p>
<p>SPCG 4</p>
<p>The Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study No. 4 (SPCG 4) reported an improvement in overall and disease-specific mortality for men undergoing radical prostatectomy compared to watchful waiting. The absolute OS benefit favoring prostatectomy was 12%, which translated to a median 2.9 years of life gained at median 23 years of follow-up</p>
<p>Prostate cancer Active surveillance inclusion criteria</p>
<p>Men with very low risk and low risk PCa per AUA and NCCN guidelines (or clinically insignificant disease per Epstein criteria) are typically candidates for AS.
<br></br>
<br></br>These criteria include:
<br></br>1. Grade Group 1 (Gleason score ≤ 6)
<br></br>2. Clinical stage ≤ T2a
<br></br>3. PSA density < 0.15ng/mL/g
<br></br>4. < or ≤ 3 positive biopsy cores
<br></br>5. ≤ 50% cancer in each core</p>
<p>PUNCH trial</p>
<p>randomized patients with high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy with docetaxel and ADT plus radical prostatectomy or radical prostatectomy alone. Results indicated no difference in 3-year biochemical progression free rates, the primary endpoint. However, neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy was associated with improved MFS and OS compared to surgery alone</p>
<p>RADICALS-RT trial</p>
<p>enrolled 1396 men with intermediate-to-high risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, and randomized them to adjuvant vs. early salvage RT demonstrated no statistically significant difference with regards to biochemical progression-free survival and freedom from subsequent hormonal therapy between the treatment arms. Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with an increased number of urinary and bowel adverse effects.</p>
<p>Recommended dose for conventonial fractionated EBRT in prostate cancer</p>
<p>Recommended doses for conventionally fractionated radiation are 75.6 to 79.2 Gy for low-risk cancers and up to 81 Gy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancers</p>
<p>What is EBRT</p>
<p>External Beam Radiation Therapy
<br></br>
<br></br>delivered using a linear accelerator (LINAC.) The LINAC generates a high energy electron beam that is passed through a tungsten target to generate a photon beam. These beams reach megavoltage energies (commonly 6-15 MV) capable of delivering ionizing radiation energies to targets deep in the body.</p>
<p>What is 3DCRT</p>
<p>Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy.
<br></br>
<br></br>The process of using CT images to generate a 3-dimensional radiation plan to maximize radiation dose to the target volume while minimizing dose to neighboring organs at risk (OAR’s)</p>
<p>What is IMRT</p>
<p>Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) is a specialized form of EBRT. The process of generating an IMRT plan is similar to the generation of a 3DCRT plan. However, IMRT utilizes a process called inverse planning.</p>
<p>RT for low risk prostate cancer</p>
<p>Eligible patients: Men with NCCN low-risk prostate cancer (T1-2a and Gleason score 6 and PSA < 10 ng/ml).
<br></br>
<br></br>In addition to AS and RP, radiation treatment options for low-risk prostate cancer include EBRT or brachytherapy monotherapy.</p>
<p>RT for intermediate risk prostate cancer</p>
<p>Eligible Patients: T2b-T2c or T1-T2a with Gleason score 7 or PSA 10-20 ng/ml.
<br></br>Radiation Treatment
<br></br>
<br></br>Options: EBRT +/- short course androgen deprivation therapy, brachytherapy monotherapy, combination brachytherapy and EBRT +/- short course androgen deprivation therapy.</p>
<p>Ascende-RT trial</p>
<p>compared 46 Gy of pelvic EBRT with dose-escalation by 3DCRT (DE-EBRT) boost to 78 Gy or with an LDR boost.
<br></br>
<br></br>Men with both NCCN intermediate- (N==122, 30.7%) and high-risk disease (N=276, 69.3%) were eligible and received 1 year of ADT with 8 months delivered neoadjuvantly. With a median follow-up of 6.5 years there was a significantly greater risk of bPFS in men treated with DE-EBRT vs brachytherapy boost among the total population (HR=2.04, p=0.004) and among men with NCCN intermediate-risk disease (p=0.003). No benefit in prostate cancer specific or all-cause mortality could be observed.</p>
<p>RT for High/very HR prostate cancer</p>
<p>Eligible Patients: T3-T4 or Gleason score 8-10, or PSA > 20 ng/ml.
<br></br>
<br></br>Radiation Treatment options: EBRT + long course ADT or combination brachytherapy and EBRT + ADT.</p>
<p>Adjuvant RT post prostatectomy</p>
<p>Eligible Patients: pT3 disease, positive margins at prostatectmy.
<br></br>Radiation treatment options: EBRT to the prostatic fossa..
<br></br>
<br></br>Evidence shows improved Biochemical reurrence free survival and OS</p>
<p>Salvage RT post prostatectomy</p>
<p>Eligible Patients: detectable and rising PSA (≥ 0.1 ng/ml) without radiographic evidence of nodal or distant metastasis.
<br></br>Radiation treatment options: EBRT +/- ADT.
<br></br>
<br></br>those most likely to benefit include those with Gleason less than 7, with pre-RT PSA less than 2ng/mL, negative SVI, positive margins, and those with PSA doubling times greater than 10 months.
<br></br>
<br></br>-prostatic fossa/pelvic lymph node RT with short-term ADT confers better biochemical control.</p>
<p>List trials of adjuvant vs salvage radiation post prostatectomy</p>
<p>https://university.auanet.org/core/img/223_table7_2021.png</p>
<p>ProPSMA trial</p>
<p>prospective multi-institutional study in which patients with high risk prostate cancer (PSA>20, clinical stage T3-4, Grade Group 3-5) were randomized to gallium-68-PSMA-PSMA-11 PET/CT vs conventional imaging (bone scan and CT scan)
<br></br>
<br></br>PSMA PET-CT was more sensitive (85% [74-96] vs. 38% [24-52]) and specific (91% [85-97] vs 98% [95-100]) than convention first-line imaging for the detection of nodal or metastatic disease.</p>
<p>Guideline recommendation for prostate cN1 nodes on conventional imaging</p>
<p>systemic treatment with ADT +/- radiation therapy to the primary
<br></br>
<br></br>Currently, surgical management of cN1 patients should be restricted to patients enrolled in clinical trials</p>
<p>PROMIS trial</p>
<p>576 men underwent a 1.5 Tesla mpMRI followed by both TRUS biopsy and a template mapping prostate biopsy. For clinically significant cancer, mpMRI was more sensitive (93%; 95% CI 88-96%) and less specific (41%; 95% CI 36-46%). The authors concluded that using mpMRI to triage men might allow 27% of patients to avoid a primary biopsy and 5% fewer clinically insignificant cancers would be detected</p>
<p>PRECISION Study</p>
<p>500 men without a history of a prostate biopsy and a clinical suspicion for prostate cancer were randomized to undergo mpMRI with targeted biopsy versus standard TRUS prostate biopsy. Clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 38% of the mpMRI targeted biopsy group as compared to 26% of the TRUS biopsy group (p=0.005) and fewer men in the mpMRI targeted biopsy group received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer</p>
<p>ExoDx</p>
<p>a urine-based 3-gene exosome (ERG, PCA3, and SPDEF) expression assay validated for the risk of clinically significant PCa in men without a prior biopsy.</p>
<p>miR</p>
<p>a urine-based test interrogates small noncoding RNAs (sncRNA) isolated from urinary exosomes. This test was developed and validated to stratify patients with prostate cancer into risk categories</p>
<p>MPS</p>
<p>MPS (MyProstateScore, formerly Michigan Prostate Score (MiPS)): combination of serum PSA, urinary PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG validated to assess the risk of incident PCa and clinically significant PCa. In validation it was shown to improve upon the performance of PSA or PCA3 alone in detecting aggressive PCa</p>
<p>PCA3</p>
<p>a non-coding mRNA in urine, may help identify incident and clinically significant PCa</p>
<p>Select MDX</p>
<p>a urine-based risk assessment that measures DLX1 and HOXC6 against KLK3 mRNA levels in post-DRE urine validated for the risk of clinically significant PCa (≥3+4) in men without a prior biopsy</p>
<p>4K score</p>
<p>a blood-based validated risk assessment for clinically significant PCa in men at risk for PCa.</p>
<p>PHI</p>
<p>blood-based risk assessment using PSA, percent free PSA, and [-2]proPSA to estimate the risk of clinically significant PCa</p>
<p>Confirm MDX</p>
<p>is an epigenetic test of the PCa-associated genes GSTP1, APC, and RASSF1. It is assessed on non-cancerous biopsy tissue and is validated to predict the absence of PCa on subsequent biopsy (rules out need for further biopsy)</p>
<p>OncotypeDx</p>
<p>17-gene expression panel validated to predict the risk of adverse pathology at surgery and the risk of metastasis and death after treatment. It can be used to inform the decision between active surveillance and definitive therapy</p>
<p>Prolaris</p>
<p>a 31-gene expression panel validated to predict the risk of disease-specific mortality with conservative management and the risk of metastatic disease after treatment. It can be used following biopsy to better determine whether a patient should receive active surveillance or definitive therapy.</p>
<p>ProMark</p>
<p>an 8-protein proteomic assessment validated to assess the risk of adverse pathology. May be utilized for low or very low risk patients post biopsy to select active surveillance versus definitive therapy</p>
<p>Decipher</p>
<p>a 22-gene genomic classifier that is validated to predict the risk of metastasis to select patients who are better treated with definitive therapy</p>
<p>PCPT trial</p>
<p>Prostate cancer prevention trial
<br></br>
<br></br>Ca was detected by biopsy (which included end-of study biopsies) in a remarkable 24.4% of the study participants, and finasteride decreased the overall relative risk of PCa by 25%.</p>
<p>REDUCE trial</p>
<p>Reduction by dutasteride of Prostate cancer Events
<br></br>
<br></br>xamined the effects of dutasteride in a higher risk cohort (PSA 2.5-10 ng/ml and negative prior biopsy), with a similar relative risk reduction of 25% and an absolute reduction of 5.1%.73</p>
<p>SELECT Trial</p>
<p>randomized 35,533 men at low risk for PCa to regimens of either vitamin, or combinations of these agents.
<br></br>
<br></br>No significant differences were found in rates of PCa across the intervention groups. Therefore, Selenium or Vitamin E is not recommended for the prevention of PCa.</p>
<p>Most potent stimulator of the androgen receptor</p>
<p>dihydrotestosterone which is the principal androgen in the prostate cell</p>
<p>Mechanisms of castration resistant prostate cancer</p>
<p>1. Ability of CaP cells to use intracellular androgens via de novo synthesis or get it exogenously from the adrenal galnds and tumor microenvironment
<br></br>
<br></br>2. Increased AR expression
<br></br>
<br></br>3. AR gene mutation that allow the receptor to be activated by other ligands other than other androgens
<br></br>
<br></br>4. Alterations of AR signaling to promote tumor growth
<br></br>
<br></br>5. Synthesis of AR variants (AR-V7)</p>
<p>Treatment options for mCSPC (3)</p>
<p>1. ADT alone
<br></br>2. Docetaxel + ADT (CHAARTED, STAMPEDE)
<br></br>3. AA + ADT</p>
<p>CHAARTED TRIAL</p>
<p>790 men w/ newly dx mCSPC randomized to ADT vs. ADT+ 6 cycles of docetaxel. At median f/u of 53.7 mos, the median OS was 47.2 mos versus 57.6 mos in favor of the ADT + docetaxel arm (HR 0.72, (0.59-0.89), P=0.0018).
<br></br>
<br></br>There was a benefited seen in men withhigh vol dz but not in low vol dz</p>
<p>STAMPEDE Trial</p>
<p>Multi-arm, multi-stage of ~ 3000 men, wherein the addition of docetaxel to ADT improved OS. In the subset of 1086 men with metastatic disease, the median OS for men undergoing ADT alone was 45 mos compared to 60 mos in the ADT plus docetaxel arm (HR 0.76 (0.62-0.92), P=0.005).
<br></br>Also significant reduction of death in ADT + Doce arm long term
<br></br>
<br></br>ADT + Abiraterone: demonstrated that at a median follow-up of 40 months, abiraterone in addition to ADT led to an OS benefit in a group of 1,917 men. A 37% relative improvement in survival was noted with a HR of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.52-0.76, P < 0.0001).
<br></br>
<br></br>The STAMPEDE randomized trial arm H included a comparison of ADT vs ADT plus external beam radiotherapy in 2061 men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Three-year survival was noted to be 81% with radiotherapy and 73% in the control group among men with low volume metastatic disease burden by CHAARTED criteria (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.90, P=0.007).</p>
<p>GETUG-AFU 15 trial</p>
<p>Randomized, open-label phase 3 study of 385 patients that did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement in survival with the addition of docetaxel. Median survival was 58.9 mos in the ADT with docetaxel group, and 54.2 mos in the ADT alone group (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.75-1.36).</p>
<p>LATTITUDE study</p>
<p>1,199 men with de novo mPC and with 2 of 3 high risk features (visceral disease, Gleason score of ≥ 8, presence of ≥ 3 lesions on bone scan) were randomized to ADT with abiraterone or placebo. Interim analysis showed a marked benefit in the abiraterone plus ADT group with a prolongation of radiographic progression-free survival and a 38% reduction in the risk of death compared to ADT and placebo.</p>
<p>Enzamet Trial</p>
<p>randomized 1125 mCSPC patients to receive ADT plus standard nonsteroidal anti-androgens or ADT plus enzalutamide. The three year OS was 80% in the enzalutamide group and 72% in the control group. At a median follow-up of 34 months, the HR for death was 0.67 (95% CI 0.52 -0.86, P=0.002) in favor of the enzalutamide group
<br></br>
<br></br>Caveat: good number experienced AE especially if they received Docetaxal.</p>
<p>MOA and dosing of Docetaxal</p>
<p>Microtubule inhibitor
<br></br>
<br></br>75 mg/m2/dose IV x 1 on day 1 of 21 day cycle; total 6 cycles</p>
<p>MOA and dosing of Abiraterone</p>
<p>Nonsteroidal inhibitor of CYP17A1
<br></br>
<br></br>1000 mg PO daily with prednisone 5 mg PO daily</p>
<p>MOA and dosing of Apalutamide</p>
<p>Nonsteriodal anti-androgen
<br></br>
<br></br>240 mg PO daily</p>
<p>MOA and dosing of Enzalutamide</p>
<p>Androgen receptor signaling inhibitor
<br></br>
<br></br>160 mg daily</p>
<p>MOA and Radiation dose for mCSPC</p>
<p>Causes DNA damage.
<br></br>
<br></br>2.75 gy x 20 Fractions</p>
<p>Titan Trial</p>
<p>phase 3 TITAN randomized trial of 1052 men compared ADT plus apalutamide to ADT plus placebo. An interim analysis showed OS at 24 mos was 82.4% in the apalutamide arm compared to 73.5% in the placebo arm. The HR for death was 0.67 (95% CI 0.51-0.89, P=0.005). The rate of AEs was similar in the apalutamide and placebo arms</p>
<p>HORRAD Trial</p>
<p>randomized 432 patients with PSA >20 ng/mL and primary bone metastases on bone scan between 2004 and 2014 to ADT with EBRT or ADT alone. The median PSA was 142 ng/mL with 67% of the patients having ≥ 5 bone metastases. With a median follow up of 47 months, no significant diff in overall survival (45 months in EBRT + ADT group and 43 months in the ADT group (p=0.4). There was an improvement in PSA progression in the radiotherapy group HR: 0.78; 95% CT: 0.63-0.97m p=0.02)</p>
<p>Treatment options for nmCRPC</p>
<p>Observation if PSADT > 10 mos and with hormone therapy when PSADT < 10 mos
<br></br>
<br></br>ADT + AA ( Enza, Apal, Daro)</p>
<p>Definition of nmCRPC</p>
<p>defined as the patient with a rising PSA despite castrate levels of testosterone following androgen deprivation therapy and no radiographic evidence of metastases on conventional imaging with CT or MRI abdomen/pelvis and bone scan</p>
<p>PROSPER Trial</p>
<p>1401 patients w/ nmCRPC and a PSA DT of 10 mos or less (mean PSA DT 3.7 mos) were randomized 2:1 to receive enza plus ADT or placebo plus ADT. The median MFS was 36.6 mos in the enza group vs 14.7 mos in the placebo group (HR 0.29, CI 0.24-0.35; p<0.001).
<br></br>
<br></br>Median OS was 67 months</p>
<p>SPARTAN TRIAL</p>
<p>1207 patients with nmCRPC and a PSA DT of 10 months or less were randomized 2:1 to receive apalutamide plus ADT or placebo plus ADT. Median MFS was 40.5 months in the apalutamide group as compared with 16.2 mos in the placebo group (HR for metastasis or death 0.28, 95% CI 0.23-0.35; p<0.001)
<br></br>
<br></br>Time to symptomatic progression was longer in the apa group.</p>
<p>ARAMIS</p>
<p>1509 patients w/ nmCRPC, PSA DT of 10 mos or less, baseline PSA level of 2 ng/mL and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 were randomized 2:1 to receive darolutamide 600 mg BID vs. placebo while continuing ADT. Median f/u was 17.9 mos. The median MFS was 40.4 mos with darolutamide compared to 18.4 mos w/ placebo (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.50; p<0.001)
<br></br>
<br></br>Risk of death was lower and time to pain progression was longer.</p>
<p>Treatment strategies for mCRPC (8 categories)</p>
<p>Abiraterone, enazalutamide: mCRPC
<br></br>
<br></br>Sipuleucel: Asymptomatic/minimal symptoms, no live metastases
<br></br>
<br></br>Docetaxel, Cabazitazel: mCRPC
<br></br>
<br></br>Olaparib- DDR mutation following androgen receptor directed therapy
<br></br>
<br></br>Rucaparib- BCRA 1/1 mutation following AR directed therapy and taxane based chemo
<br></br>
<br></br>Radium- 223- Symptomatic bone mets
<br></br>
<br></br>Lu-PSMA-617- PSMA expressing mets. FDA breakthrough therapy designated
<br></br>
<br></br>Pembrolizumab: Unresectable or metastatic tumor with: 1. High Microsatellite instability or high tumor mutational burden (>/= 10)</p>
<p>Definition of castration resistance</p>
<p>serum testosterone level < 50 ng/dl or 1.7 nmol/L + 1 of the following:
<br></br>
<br></br>Biochemical progression: 3 consecutive rises in PSA at least one week apart, resulting in 25% increases over the nadir, and PSA greater than 2 ng/mL
<br></br>
<br></br>Radiographic progression: The appearance of new lesions: Either 2 or more new bone lesions on a bone scan and confirmed by other imaging modality (e.g., CT or MRI) if ambiguous or a soft tissue lesion measurable using RECIST criteria</p>
<p>Denosumab</p>
<p>human monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand (RANKL), acting to inhibit RANKL, the main driver of osteoclast formation, function and survival</p>
<p>What is PSMA</p>
<p>Prostate-specific transmembrane antigen, a transmembrane glutamate carboxypeptidase, is highly expressed on prostate cancer cells, with high expression being an independent biomarker of poor prognosis in both early- and late-stage disease</p>
<p>What is Radium-223</p>
<p>an isotope of radium that emits a low level of alpha particle radiation with an affinity for sites of bone metastases. It has a half-life of 11.4 days and works by causing double-stranded DNA breaks.</p>
<p>What is Sipuleucel</p>
<p>immunotherapy product that contains patient-specific autologous dendritic cells loaded ex vivo with a recombinant fusion protein consisting of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) linked to a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) designed to break immune tolerance to normal tissue antigen PAP.</p>
<p>What are PARPi's</p>
<p>Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) are a large family of 18 proteins which are responsible for facilitating DNA repair caused by either single-strand break or base excision repair pathways. PARP inhibitors cause genomic instability and cell death due to the inability to repair damaged DNA.
<br></br>
<br></br>Olaparib
<br></br>Rucaparib</p>
<p>MOA and dosing of Cabazitaxel</p>
<p>Cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane with a broader range of cytotoxicity, high potency that remains cytotoxic for docetaxel-resistant cell lines due to gp-1 overexpression with better blood-brain penetration than docetaxel.
<br></br>
<br></br>25mg/m2 q21 days + prednisone</p>
<p>MOA of Mitoxantrone</p>
<p>anthracycline chemotherapy that acts during multiple phases of the cell cycle to disrupt DNA synthesis and DNA repair.
<br></br>
<br></br>Currently no role for Mitotoxantrone in treating mCRPC</p>
<p>MOA and role of Docetaxel in mCRPC</p>
<p>second-generation taxane chemotherapy that inhibits microtubule assembly into the mitotic spindle, thus arresting the cell cycle during G2/M phase. Docetaxel may also increase apoptosis by downregulation of the BCL2 gene, which tends to be over-expressed in cancer cells.
<br></br>
<br></br>Tax trial: phase 3 doce plus prednisone vs mitotoxantrone + prednisone
<br></br>
<br></br>SWOG 9916: Phase 3 doce + estrasmustine vs mitotoxantrone + pred.
<br></br>
<br></br>Both trial Docetaxel group showed longer median survival compared to control.</p>
<p>Tests available to detect cortisol hypersecretion (Cushing Syndrome)</p>
<p>Overnight low-dose (1-mg) dexamethasone suppression test (OST): higher sensitivity for detecting subclinical
<br></br>
<br></br>Late-night salivary cortisol test (SCT): easiest
<br></br>
<br></br>24-hour urinary-free cortisol evaluation (UFC): standard test but more time intensive</p>
<p>How is a diagnosis of cushing syndrome made after OST</p>
<p>A putative diagnosis of Cushing Syndrome is made if the serum cortisol level is > 5 micrograms/dL following an OST</p>
<p>Conn Syndrome</p>
<p>hyperaldosteronism due to a single adrenal nodule
<br></br>
<br></br>classic syndrome includes hypertension, hypokalemia, and alkalosis, up to 40% of patients with this syndrome are normokalemic</p>
<p>How is primary hyperaldosteronism diagnosed</p>
<p>An ARR≥20 along with a concomitant aldosterone concentration above 15 ng/mL suggest the diagnosis of primary hyperaldosteronism</p>
<p>Screening Guidelines for hyperaldosternonism (8)</p>
<p>1. Any patient with sustained blood pressure above 150/100 on three separate measurements taken on different days
<br></br>
<br></br>2. Hypertension resistant to 3 antihypertensives
<br></br>
<br></br>3. Hypertension controlled with four or more medications
<br></br>
<br></br>4. Hypertension and low potassium
<br></br>
<br></br>5. Hypertension and a newly diagnosed adrenal incidentaloma
<br></br>
<br></br>6. Hypertension and concomitant sleep apnea
<br></br>
<br></br>7. Hypertension and a family history of early onset hypertension or stroke before age 40
<br></br>
<br></br>8. All first-degree relatives of patients with a diagnosis of primary aldosteronism</p>
<p>Medications that cause falsely elevated metanephrines</p>
<p>levodopa, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, benzodiazepines, tetracycline, and rapid withdrawal from clonidine</p>
<p>How is pheochromocytoma diagnosed</p>
<p>with plasma-free metanephrine and normetanephrine levels or 24-hour total urinary metanephrines and fractionated catecholamines
<br></br>
<br></br>Caveat: Metanephrines are more sensitive than catecholamines since metabolism is continuous, unlike catecholamine release which occurs episodically.2 The higher sensitivity of metanephrines also means they have a higher false positive rate. However, elevation above designated thresholds (>2x the upper limit of normal) in either study suggests the presence of pheochromocytoma</p>
<p>When should sex hormone testing be performed with adrenal masses?</p>
<p>not warranted unless the patient is suspected of having an adrenocortical carcinoma (mass > 4 cm) and/or obvious clinical stigmata of feminization or virilization.
<br></br>
<br></br>Measure DHEA with 17-Ketosteroids
<br></br>
<br></br>For women: Get serum testosterone
<br></br>
<br></br>For men get 17B-estradiol</p>
<p>When should sdrenalectomy be performed in nonfunctioning adrenal masses?</p>
<p>If the lesion size increases by ≥ 1 cm or develops functionality, surgery should be considered. However, 75-95% of incidentalomas remain stable in size while 2-8% of previously non-functioning lesions develop functionality, with hypersecretion of cortisol being the most common finding.</p>
<p>Associated syndromes with adrenocortical carcinoma</p>
<p>familial syndromes such as Li-Fraumeni, Beckwith-Wiedemann, MEN-1, McCune-Albright, and Carney complex.</p>
Main prognostic factors for adrenocortico carcinoma
tumor stage and completeness of surgical resection.
Most common sites of adrenal mets
Liver, (48%) lung (45%), LN (29%), bone (13%)
Standard treatment for adrenocortical carcinomas
Open adrenalectomy
Lymph drainage from the bladder
Level I: internal iliac, obturator, external iliac
Level II: comon iliac, presacral
Level III: paracaval, para-aortic, and interaortocaval
MCC of Granulomatous cystitis
Intravesical BCG
Treatment of BCG related granulomatous cystitis
treated with isoniazid (300 mg PO daily) and pyridoxine (vitamin B6, 25 mg PO daily) for 3 months.
Causes of bilharzial cystitis
parasitic infection caused by schistosomal species (s. haematobium and S. mansoni).
treatment of bladder malakoplakia
transurethral resection/biopsy followed by a prolonged course of antibiotics (1st line = quinolones, 2nd line = rifampin or trimethoprim). Drugs that activate cGMP (bethanechol and vitamin C) may be of benefit.
Treatment of Bladder amylodosis
Patients with a high volume of bladder amyloidosis or those recurring frequently with amyloid plaques in the bladder can be treated with intravesical DMSO (50 mL of 50% solution for 30 min every 2 weeks for 3-12 months) to dissolve the unwanted protein. Cystectomy is occasionally required.
Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor
presents in patients with irritative LUTS or hematuria.
Post operative Spindle cell Nodule
Variant of IMT, occurs after previous surgery. indistinguishable from bladder cancer.
Genes associated with Lynch syndrome and Bladder cancer
MSH2, MSH 6, MLH 1, PMS2
seen in colon cancer, 80%) endometrial cancer (80%), gastric, ovrain, and urothelial cancer
Genes associated with Peutz Jeghers and Bladder cancer
STK 11
GI hamartomas, Mealonitc macules, intussusception, colon cance, Breast cancer, lung caner, Pancreatic/biliary cancer, sex cord stomal tumors
Genes associated with Cowden syndomr and Bladder cancer
PTEN, KLLN
Seen in mucocutaneous hamartomas (100%), Breast cancer (80%), Brain tumor, Thyroid cancer, Endometrial cancer, Kidney cancer, Colon cancer, Bladder cancer, melanoma, Macrocephaly
Genes associated with Li-Fraumeni and Bladder cancer
P53 & CHEK2
Involved soft tissue sarcoma, breast cancer, bladder cancer, adrenocorticcal carcioma, leujemia
Genes associated with neurofibromatosis and Bladder cancer
NF 1 (neurofibromin), NF2 (merlin)
Neurofibromas, lish nodules, scoliosis,s cafe au lait spots, acoustic neuromas, schwanomas, meningiomas
Recurrence rate of LgTa bladder tumor
15- 70% at one year but low rate of prgoression to higher stage disease with <5% progressing to MIBC
Recurrence rate of Hg Ta
13-40% progressing to lamina propria invasion, and 6-25% change of becoming muscle invasion
Risk of progression and rcurrence for T1 bladder tumor
50% within 3 years and 80%. cance of recurrence
Risk of recurrence of and progression of CIS
82% and 42-83% if not treated with adjuvant intravesical therapy
Adjuvant intravesical therapy of intermediate risk NMIBC
intermediate-risk patient a clinician should consider administration of a six-week course of induction intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy with BCG.
Adjuvant intravesical therapy of intermediate risk NMIBC
high-risk patient with newly diagnosed CIS, high-grade T1, or high-risk Ta urothelial carcinoma, a clinician should administer a six-week induction course of BCG
Induction course. of BCG
The standard induction course is the same for immunotherapy and chemotherapy: the agent is instilled intravesically weekly for a total of 6 doses and then cystoscopy is performed 6 weeks later to assess for response.
BCG maintenance schedule
The most common maintenance schedule for BCG is the Lamm/SWOG regimen (triplets of BCG given at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months) which was associated with a 19% improvement in the 5-year recurrence-free survival (41% vs. 60%) and 6%_ improvement in the 5-year worsening-free survival [no progression including pT2 or greater, use of cystectomy, systemic chemotherapy, or radiation therapy; 70% vs. 76%, p=0.04)
BCG refractory and next steps
persistent disease after 6 months of BCG therapy or who have progression of disease at 3 months (such as Ta/CIS to T1). Most guidelines recommend assessment at 6 months since
BCG relapsing
Describes patients who recur after BCG treatment. This can be early (within 12 months), intermediate (12-24 months), or late (>24 months).
BCG intolerance
describes disease persistence secondary to inability to receive adequate BCG due to toxicity/side effects
BCG unresponsive and next steps
BCG refractory or those who relapse within 6 months of treatment. There is no additional benefit to more BCG treatment in BCG-unresponsive patients and these are the patients for whom cystectomy is indication or enrollment onto trials of novel therapeutics.
Nadoferagene firadenovec
replication incompetent type 5 adenovirus designed to infect the bladder and produce the anticancer cytokine interferon α2b
T4 Bladder cancer
Tumor invades any of the following: prostatic stroma, seminal vesicles, uterus, vagina, pelvic wall, abdominal wall
T4a Bladder cancer
Tumor invades prostatic stroma, uterus, vagina
T4b Bladder cancer
Tumor invades pelvic wall, abdominal wall