adr (section a - criminal courts and lay people) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)?

A

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a process used to resolve disputes between parties without having to go to court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Whose reforms encourage ADR?

A

Lord Woolf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ADR is used by?

A

businesses, individuals and organisations for cheap and quick resolutions to disputes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Negotiation in ADR?

A
  • parties reach agreement themselves with no third party
  • may act through solicitors
  • may negotiate before trial and settle before trial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Example of negotiation

A

disputes between neighbours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is mediation in ADR?

A
  • a neutral third person helps the parties in a dispute reach a compromise solution acting as a facilitator.
  • mediator does not offer an opinion but acts as a message carrier and takes a passive role.
  • explore position and carry offers while being confidential
  • only suitable if chance of cooperation
  • control and both parties can withdraw
  • resolution can’t be imposted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

example of mediation

A

relate - for relationships
centre for effective dispute resolution - for businesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is concillation

A

Similar to mediation but with more power
Conciliator suggests grounds for compromise or settlement
Takes an active role in finding out parties’ positions
Cannot seek evidence or call witnesses
Parties have control and can withdraw at any point
Outcome cannot be imposed upon parties, they must agree to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

conciliation example

A

Often used in industrial disputes using ACAS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

arbitration definition

A

A process where parties agree to allow their dispute to be judged by a neutral arbitrator or panel of arbitrators.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

arbitration additional points

A

Governed by the Arbitration Act 1996.
Agreements to engage in arbitration can be made before a dispute arises through a Scott Avery Clause in the contract.
The parties may appoint an arbitrator or the court may do so.
Arbitrators are often experts in the relevant field or a lawyer may be appointed for disputes involving a point of law.
Parties agree on the procedure and the date, time, and place of the arbitration in consultation with the arbitrator.
The decision is binding and enforceable by the courts.
Awards can be challenged in the courts under s.68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 for serious irregularity in proceedings or on a point of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is an employment tribunal

A

A forum used instead of court for deciding certain disputes related to employment.
Created to help people enforce their entitlement to social rights granted through social and welfare legislation.
Must be used instead of court due to the nature of the dispute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

employment tribunal procedure

A
  • both sides out case forward
  • formal - evidence under oath but no wig/gown
  • funding for rep not usually available but advice can be gained in strength of their case
  • in employment tribunals there is rep from trade unions
  • decision is binding
  • no fee
  • claim must be brought within 3 months, less than a day before event: redundancy, discrimination or unfair dismissal in workplace
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

employment tribunal preliminary matters

A
  • usually acas contact first
  • claim issued if not resolved
  • claim sets out detailed reasons for action and must be filed with tribunal within time limit
  • employer invited to make comments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

employment tribunals panel hearing

A

judge
rep for employee and employer
short trial and can be open to public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

employment tribunal outcome

A

in favour of employee:
- panel encourages settlement
- favourable reference
- compensation
if no settlement then compensation awarded

if claim lost
- employee doesn’t pay employers costs
- employee responsible for own lawyers
if dissatisfied = in 14 days, tribunal can review decision

17
Q

employment tribunal appeals

A
  • either side can appeal to EAT in 42 days only on point of law
  • further appeal to CoA and SC on point of law and leave to appeal from EAT
18
Q

ADV OF CIVIL COURTS - use of legally qualified person

A

P - use legally qual person
DP - trial conducted by legal expert and decision by experienced and qualified lawyer - appropriate in complex legal cases
WDP - competent legal decision = legally binding, both parties guaranteed that matter will be resolved

19
Q

ADV OF CIVIL COURTS - time management

A

P - time management
DP - judge has control, allocation questionnaire to ensure case is allocated to right track - ensure strict timetable, eg length of hearing and no of witnesses set
WDP - minimises delay in case heard and costs less for parties

20
Q

ADV OF CIVIL COURTS - use of precedent

A

P - use of precedent
DP - lawyers can advise clients due to existing decision
WDP - also appeal process so if C not happy, can appeal

21
Q

ADV OF CIVIL COURTS - cost

A

P - cost
DP - some legal aid available for civil matters unlike ADR
WDP - parties can’t walk away which may save costs. failed mediation or conciliation = more costs if it goes to court

22
Q

ADV OF CIVIL COURTS - open system

A

P - open system
DP - companies can’t hide behind private arbitration. public aware of case and customers
WDP - of public aware, they can guard against it eg use alternative company

23
Q

DISADVANTAGE OF CIVIL COURT - cost

A

P - cost
DP - cost of court fee can be more than amount claimed due to front loading costs
WDP - eg in High Court, cost can be hundreds of thousands and for smaller claims, costs more than amount claimed

24
Q

DISADVANTAGE OF CIVIL COURTS - delay

A

P - delay
DP - mixed views if track system helped reduce delays eg fast track can take 48 weeks and small claims 29 weeks
WDP - due to preliminary stages that add to length of case. total of this and wait means cases can take years

25
Q

DISADVANTAGE OF CIVIL COURTS - complicated process

A

P - complicated
DP - compulsory actions before case started in court eg pre action protocols and forms set out in Civil Procedure Rules but too complicated for lay person
WDP - ordinary person without legal advice or help may struggle to take a case to court = no ATJ

26
Q

DISADVANTAGE OF CIVIL COURTS - uncertainty

A

P - uncertainty
DP - no guarantee of winning a case, person losing may have to pay other side’s costs - difficult to know how much a case is going to cost in advance
WDP - delays in cases = uncertainty and cost which may deter people from taking case to court = denied access to justice

27
Q

DISADVANTAGES OF CIVIL COURTS - little use of ADR

A

P - little use of ADR
DP - despite woolf reform suggesting increase it its use, little increase so burden of caseload is with civil courts = delays and costs for trials
WDP - civil courts under resourced with IT systems

28
Q

ADVANTAGE OF MEDIATION/CONCILLATION - parties in control

A

P - parties in control
DP - can withdraw from process, a compromise cannot be reached without the agreement of both parties
WDP - different from arbitration, decisions not legally binding, more likely to reach favourable decision

29
Q

ADVANTAGE OF MEDIATION/CONCILLATION - speed and cost

A

P - speed and cost
DP - cheaper and quicker than court, issue resolved earlier- advantageous for businesses who may be running at a loss
WDP - if goes to court then mediation clarified issues so court hearing faster

30
Q

ADVANTAGE OF MEDIATION/CONCILLATION - private

A

P - private
DP - more priv than court and media les a likely so only parties aware of dispute
WDP - rep of businesses less likely to be damaged - commercial sense

31
Q

ADVANTAGE OF MEDIATION/CONCILLATION - successful

A

P - successful
DP - avoids adversarial conflict of court rooms and winner/loser result of court proceedings - everyone wins
WDP - high number of cases are resolved - centre for dispute resolution = 80% of cases are settled

32
Q

ADVANTAGE OF MEDIATION/CONCILLATION - not strictly legal

A

P - not strictly legal
DP - more likely to be based on commercial sense and compromise than letter of law
WDP - easier for companies to continue business with each other - include agreements about conducts of future business between parties

33
Q

DISADVANTAGES OF MEDIATION AND CONCILLATION - dispute not resolved

A

P -