Admissions Flashcards

1
Q

What is an admission?

A

A previous representation made by a person who is party to a proceeding; and
Adverse to the person’s interest in the outcome in the proceeding.
Any inculpatory statement or exculpatory lie.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are different types of admissions?

A

Gestures
Actions/Flight
Oral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does section 81 say?

A

(1) Hearsay and opinion rule do not apply to evidence of an admissions.
(2) Hearsay and opinion rule don’t apply to a previous representation in relation to admission if it was made shortly before or after and is necessary to understand the admission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does section 82 say?

A

Section 81 only applies if the evidence of the admission was saw, heard or otherwise perceived(first hand) by the person giving the evidence or it is a document in which the admission was made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does section 60 apply to admissions?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does section 83 say about admissions?

A

Section 81 does not apply to admissions in respect to third party cases.
Unless consent is given.
Can not consent to partly must be entire.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does R v Fulling define Oppression as?

A

R v Fulling utilised the ordinary meaning of exercise authority or power in a burdensome, harsh or wrongful manner, unjust or cruel treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Priestly states in determining oppressive what test is applied?

A

R v Priestly says the test is both subjective and objective. The court must take into account the subjective traits of the defendant, ie age, mental capabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Section 85 says what and what test does it apply?

A

It is an objective test as to the reliability/truthfulness of an admission in the presence of law enforcement.
The admissions is only admissible if it was unlikely that the truth of the admission was adversely affect.
(3) non exhaustive list of factors to take into account, ie subjective factors, nature of questions, manner of questions and nature of any threat, promise, or inducement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does section 281 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 say?

A

Evidence of an admission for an indictable offence, other than an indictable offence that can be heard summarily (T1) are not admissible unless it was recorded on to a tape recording, or there is a reasonable excuse as to why it could not be made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the definition of Tape Recording?

A

Audio Recording
Video Recording
or both.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does section 86 say about admissions?

A

A document prepared on behalf of an investigating official, is not admissible to prove the contents unless the defendant acknowledges the document, by signing, initialing or otherwise marking the document.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can the prosecutor comment on the accused remaining silent?

A

No you should never comment on the accused remaining silent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does Weissensteiner v The Queen say?

A

Only comment on accused remaining silent in the very specific circumstance where knowledge would only be within the accused and the inference the prosecutor is seeking to make and the accused could have contradicted or explained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the test for section 90 discretion to exclude admissions?

A

Onus - On Defence, admission must be adduced by prosecution for objection.
Focus - At the time of hearing
Regards to the circumstances in which the admissions was made it would unfair to use.
Test - Balance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does Pavitt v Regina say?

A

If an admission is made prior to any official questioning taking place it would be very hard for defence to argue under S.90.

17
Q

What does R v Horton say?

A

That an exculpatory statement can amount to an admission. Also capable of formulating an exculpatory statement therefore negativing intoxication level.

18
Q

Section 165 applies to admissions what does it say?

A

That 165 categorizes admissions among other things that they may be unreliable evidence.