Admissibility Procedures Flashcards
Making the Record - Preserving an Error
In order to make any challenges on appeal, the error must be properly preserved. Objection to the error must be (1) timely and specific and violate a (2) substantial right. If these conditions are not met the error is waived even if the evidence was inadmissible. (“The #1 Rule for Evidence”)
Making the Record - Timely and Specific
The objecting counsel must object to the offer of evidence as soon as possible and specify the reason why they object. Timely means as soon as the ground for objection is apparent.
Making the Record - Substantial right
A court will evaluate based on the current case’s context. Factors to consider are: Criminal right v. civil right, Jury v. bench, Strong case v. weak case, Peripheral issue v. central issue, Minor error v. major error, Error impacting constitutional rights v. error impacting statutory right.
- CA: Miscarriage of Justice, so there must be a harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt (Chapman)
Making the Record - Offer of Proof
There must be an offer of proof justifying why the evidence should be admitted on the record, it must include (1) the substance of the evidence excluded and (2) what it tends to prove. (Is this the same as lay the foundation, show the witness the picture before asking about it?)
Making the Record - Common Objections
leading question, evidence assumes facts not in evidence, lay witness objection, witness lacks personal knowledge, argumentative, compound question
Making the Record - Three types of Errors
Harmless error, prejudicial/reversible error, plain error
Making the Record - Harmless Error
The appellate court can rule that an error, even if properly preserved, is harmless when it is so insignificant that there is no change to the case below. This usually happens if the other evidence is so overwhelming
Making the Record - Prejudicial / Reversible Error
A properly preserved error that affects a substantial right to warrant a new trial by the court below
Making the Record - Plain Error
An error that is not preserved or raised properly at trial but the error must have been egregious, grave type of error.
- CA: Has no plain error rule but can argue deprived of a fair trial which essentially gets the same / similar effect.
Authentication / Identification
To admit anything into evidence on the record, the counsel must lay a foundation and identify / authenticate by proving the evidence is what it purports to be. There is no certainty requirement just enough likelihood.
Authentication - Self-Authentication
Some documents are likely to be what it is said that no extrinsic evidence is required
Authentication - Signatures
Testimony of a witness with knowledge
Authentication - Handwriting
Testimony of a witness with knowledge, comparison to other examples, distinctive characteristics of the handwriting
Authentication - Reply Letter Doctrine
While the initial communication needs to be authenticated, a response to the letter is authenticated based on the reply
Authentication - Voice
Testimony of witness with knowledge – can consider the context of the call