Admissibility Flashcards

1
Q

When do FRE apply?

A

All civil and criminal proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When do FRE not apply?

A

FRE 1101(c-d) Determining questions of fact regarding admissibility of evidence; (2) grand jury proceedings; (3) preliminary examinations in a criminal case; (4) sentencing, probation, and bail hearings; (5) summary contempt proceedings; (6) for issuance of warrants and criminal summons; and (7) extradition or rendition proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What can the judge decide in regards to evidence?

A

[FRE 104(a)] Preliminary questions about the competency of the evidence:
- Evidence is admissible
- Witnesses are qualified
- Privilege exists
Judge is NOT bound by FRE in deciding preliminary questions (except for whether privilege exists)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When does a preliminary hearing on the evidence need to occur outside the presence of the jury?

A

[FRE 104(c)] If (1) hearing involves the admissibility of a confession; (2) D in a criminal case is a witness and so requests; (3) justice so requires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the jury decide in regards to evidence?

A

[FRE 104(e)] Weight and credibility of the evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Under what circumstances can an evidentiary ruling be challenged?

A

If the ruling effects a substantial right of the party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If a party believes the evidence was erroneously admitted, how can the issue be preserved for appeal?

A

[FRE 103(a)(1)] Party must, on the record: (1) timely object or move to strike; and (2) state the specific ground, unless it was apparent from context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If a party believes evidence was erroneously excluded, how can the issue be preserved for appeal?

A

[FRE 103(a)(2)] The party must make an offer of proof (explanation on the record as to why the evidence is relevant and should be admitted), unless the substance was apparent from the context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is plain error?

A

4-prong test: (1) Deviates from a legal rule that has not been affirmatively waived by the appellant; (2) is plain, clear, or obvious, such that it cannot be reasonably contested; (3) was prejudicial or affected the outcome of the lower court; (4) if (1)-(3) are satisfied, the court has the discretion to correct the error only if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can the court take notice of the error if the party fails to preserve an appeal for plain error?

A

[FRE 103(e)] Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Limiting Instruction

A

[FRE 105] If evidence is admissible for one purpose but not for another, court may limit the scope of the evidence and instruct the jury accordingly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rule of Completeness

A

If a party introduces part of a writing or recording, the adverse party may immediately or subsequently introduce any other evidence that should be considered alongside it to ensure fairness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Judicial Notice

A

Used by the court to accept certain, indisputable adjudicative facts as true without formal presentation of evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What types of facts can be judicially noticed?

A

[FRE 201(b)] Adjudicative facts that are not subject to reasonable dispute because they are (1) generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or (2) capable of being accurately and readily determined by sources whose accuracy cannot be questioned (e.g. scientific principles)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What types of facts CANNOT be judicially noticed?

A

(1) Facts are only known because of the judge’s personal knowledge (and lacking any other justification for notice) and (2) legislative facts (facts that relate to legal reasoning and the lawmaking process)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When is judicial notice mandatory?

A

[FRE 201(c)(2)] (1) When requested by a party and supported by the necessary information and (2) without request by either party if: (a) Federal and state law or (b) indisputable facts and scientific propositions

17
Q

A court can take judicial notice at what stage in a proceeding?

A

Any point in the proceeding upon request of party or court’s own initiative

18
Q

What is the impact of a judicially noticed fact on an opposing party?

A

No evidence contradicting the fact will be permitted on that issue

19
Q

What is the impact of a judicially noticed fact on a civil jury?

A

[FRE 201(f)] Civil jury MUST accept the fact as conclusive

20
Q

What is the impact of a judicially noticed fact on a criminal jury?

A

[FRE 201(f)] A criminal jury MAY accept fact as conclusive, but are not required to do so

21
Q

What may a court take judicial notice of (whether or not it is requested by the party)?

A

A court may take notice of (1) laws of foreign nations, (2) regulation of private agencies, (3) municipal ordinances, and (4) local geography

22
Q

Who decides the order and presentation of witnesses?

A

[FRE 611(a)] The court

23
Q

Can the court call witnesses?

A

[FRE 614(a)] Yes, the court may call witnesses on its own or by party’s request. Each party is entitled to cross-examine the witness.

24
Q

Can the court question witnesses?

A

[FRE 614(b)] Yes, any witness called.

25
Q

Scope of cross examination?

A
  • Subject matter of the direct examination
  • Matters affecting the witness’s credibility
  • Additional matters if court so allows
26
Q

Scope of re-direct?

A

Rebuttal of any significant matter raised on cross examination and other matters at the court’s discretion

27
Q

Scope of re-cross?

A

Significant new matters brought up on re-direct and other issues at the court’s discretion

28
Q

Leading Question

A

Question that suggests the answer in the question

29
Q

When are leading questions permitted?

A

(1) Cross examination (no restrictions) and (2) Direct examination ONLY if (a) question is regarding undisputed preliminary matters (e.g. “You were both on March 30, correct); (b) Witness is hostile; (c) witness is less competent (e.g. language barrier); or (d) witness needs help refreshing their memory (subject to judicial permission)

30
Q

What is sequestration of witnesses?

A

[FRE 615] At party’s request (typically during MiL), court must order witnesses excluded so they cannot hear another witness’s testimony. The court may also do so on its own accord.

31
Q

Burden of Production

A

Party’s obligation to establish a prima facie case (i.e. come forward with evidence necessary to establish each element of the claims alleged). Can shift during trial.

32
Q

What are the three levels of the burden of persuastion?

A

Civil: (1) Preponderance of the evidence (fact is more likely to exist than not) or (2) clear and convincing evidence (highly probable)
Criminal: (1) Beyond a reasonable doubt

33
Q

A rebuttable presumption shifts the burden of ____ to the ____ party, but the burden of _____ remains with the _____ party.

A

A rebuttable presumption shifts the burden of PRODUCTION to the OPPOSING party, but the burden of PERSUASION remains with the ORIGINAL party.

34
Q

What is the rule with presumptions in CRIMINAL cases?

A

Permissive presumptions are allowed (i.e. jury can infer, but is not required to do so). Mandatory presumptions are unconstitutional because burden of persuasion is shifted to D instead of prosecution (which is required to prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt.)

35
Q

Irrebuttable Presumption

A

Presumption created by statute or common law

36
Q

Burden of Persuasion

A

Obligation to present evidence to persuade the fact-finder that the allegations are true. Does not shift during trial.