Administrative Policy Tools - Executive Orders Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Executive Orders - History

A
  • George Washington issued the first one
  • FDR issued the most (4 terms, over 3,500 EOs)
  • Woodrow Wilson issued second-most
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actions That Have Been Done Through EO

A
  • suspending the writ of habeas corpus
  • desegregating the armed forces
  • barring discrimination by federal contractors

Overall point was that EOs have been used to do some pretty big things -> can’t judge the authority by the size of the action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Categories of What President Does Through Executive Order

A
  • regulating federal employees
  • if there’s a statutory hook, can get agencies to regulate behavior of private actors
  • organizing the executive branch (ex: OIRA was created by executive order)
  • create commissions
  • coordinate among executive branch agencies
  • policy-making internally - setting priorities for cabinet agencies (line on how directive President can be)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

EOs and Private Actors

A

Pres can issue EOs to impact behavior of private actors (though these tend to be the most controversial ones)
- procurement often carried out through Executive Order
- statutes sometimes provide a hook for regulating private actors by executive order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Youngstown - Factual Background

A
  • US in middle of Korean War
  • US Steelworkers Union - very powerful at the time, about to go on strike
  • before the strike, Truman issues EO saying steel indispensable to the war effort (would impact national defense) + seizes control of steel mills
  • Pres does notify Congress next morning + again 12 days later, but they don’t respond
  • steel companies comply, but sue (say action not authorized by statute or Constitution)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Youngstown - Aggregate Power

A
  • President Truman had tried to argue in part that the authority he invoked was within his aggregate power as the chief executive under the Constitution
  • Prof noted in class relevance of dire circumstances to the aggregate power argument - concept that on some level, might expect President to have power to address emergencies
  • powers of Commander in Chief + Article II Take Care power
  • Court ultimately doesn’t buy this though - can’t bundle together to create a new power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Youngstown - Jackson Concurrence

A
  • Prof said this = clearest articulation for assessing validity of Executive Orders
  • Prof also noted his “art of governing” passage - concept that the way the Pres exercises power will be influenced how other branches exercise their power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Youngstown - Jackson Level 1

A
  • Congress has expressly authorized something -> Pres power at its max
  • President acting pursuant to express or implied authorization of Congress
  • power includes all Presidential power plus everything Congress can delegate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Youngstown - Jackson Level 2

A
  • Congress is silent - “zone of twilight”
  • Pres needs to rely on own power, but may be area in which Pres + Congress both have power + Congressional quiescence may enable/invite Pres action to determine where the lines between these powers lies
  • Congressional inertial, indifference, or acquiescence may sometimes enable (if not invite) measures on independent presidential responsibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Youngstown - Jackson Level 3

A
  • Congress has spoken against what Pres is doing
  • “lowest ebb” - can rely only on Presidential Constitutional powers minus any constitutional powers of Congress over the matter
  • SCOTUS can sustain exclusive Pres control in such a case only by disabling Congress from acting upon a subject… Presidential claim to a power so conclusive + preclusive must be scrutinized w/ caution bc equilibrium of our US Constitutional system is at stake
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Youngstown - Which Category?

A
  • 3 - Taft-Hartley Act says what happens in labor management relations, + there’s already leg on when fed gov can seize private property for public interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Youngstown - Jackson’s Concern

A
  • thought monarchy if Truman prevailed - all exec power of which gov capable in Pres, allow Pres to use military + domestic affairs to seize power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Youngstown - Advice to Congress

A
  • Prof noted Jackson emphasizes Congress should act in emergencies so President doesn’t feel the need to grab more power
  • need to be “wise + timely” in meeting problems
  • only Congress can prevent its own power from slipping through its grasp
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Youngstown - Black Opinion

A
  • opinion of the court
  • argued Pres power must come from act of Congress or US Constitution -> no power here b/c contradicting Congressional statute, + determined exceeded Constitutional power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Youngstown - Frankfurter Concurrence

A

-Issue before us can be met without attempting to define President’s powers comprehensively
-Congress expressed its will to withhold this power from president

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Youngstown - Vinson Dissent

A
  • frustrated w/ “messenger-boy” conception of the Executive
17
Q

EOs - Source of Authority

A
  • Presidential authority to issue EOs is definitely constrained (Youngstown), but Presidents often issue EOs w/o specifying source of authority (typically use language along the lines of “authority vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and laws of the United States”)
  • Prof noted different from APA (concise statement of basis and purpose)

Rationale:
- leaves open options for authority
- not wanting to give up power
- leaves room for post hoc rationalizations (act now, explain later)

18
Q

EOs and Judicial Review Post-Youngstown

A
  • Youngstown was 1st time SCOTUS invalidated an EO, but not another one invalidated until the Clinton administration
  • Prof framed this as court not really wanting to reign in EOs yet
19
Q

Manhattan-Bronx Postal Union v. Gronouski - Factual Background

A
  • 1965, DC Circuit
  • Pres Kennedy affording collective bargaining rights to federal employees for the first time (solely an instance of Pres organizing the fed family)
  • case deals w/ a system set up for carrying out Executive Order 10988, which grew out of Kennedy’s Task Force on Employee-Management Relations in Federal Service - this system (Temporary Commission on Implementation established it) says union can only be recognized as exclusive rep if 60% of employees vote in the election
20
Q

Manhattan-Bronx - Challenge

A
  • the union is suing the Postmaster General for refusing to waive the 60% rule (was allowed under special circumstances)
21
Q

Manhattan-Bronx - Ruling + Reasoning

A
  • ct dismisses for lack of jurisdiction
    -Exec Order 10988 = formulation of broad policy by President for guidance of federal employing agencies
    -> No specific foundation in congressional action
    -> Could’ve withdrawn at any time for any reason
    -> Represented one president’s effort to move in direction he was advised to improve efficiency of federal employment -> No hard/fast directives imposed + left large areas for exercise of discretion
  • President did not undertake to create any role for judiciary in implementation of this policy
    -> Postmaster General decided to follow advice of President’s Temporary Committee to apply 60% rule and this does not seem in conflict with the Exec Order
    -> Even if it conflicted with Exec Order, it does not follow that appellants have right that warrants intervention by an equity court
    -Congress gave district court many functions but this does not include policing the faithful execution of Presidential policies by presidential appointees
22
Q

Manhattan-Bronx - Prof’s Takeaways

A
  • can’t challenge an EO that’s strictly internal to how executive branch works
  • if you have a problem w/ the EO, you need to complain to the executive (problem w/in exec branch must be addressed by the exec branch)
  • Note to self - should contemplate how this influences appeal of this option as a policy tool (if you’re in exec branch + you issue EO influencing only your own emps, can’t be challenged)
23
Q

Manhattan-Bronx - Reviewability of the kind of EO at issue?

A
  • not creating any legal rights or obligations - no agency action for review until an agency itself acts
  • Pres is NOT an agency under the APA + therefore exec’s own actions are not subject to APA review (no APA private right of action when Pres acts)
    -> no “final agency action” to challenge
    -> inaction becomes protective b/c nothing to challenge
24
Q

Significance of Manhattan-Bronx Style EOs

A
  • Prof said internal organization ones are very common but not all that legally significant (Pres could theoretically call a cabinet secretary)
  • underlying purpose typically signaling to the public
    -> responding to concerns of key constituencies
    -> performative aspect- photo op, signing ceremony
    -> shaming Congress for not doing stuff
    -> “feeding the beast”
25
Q

Rochelle Wolensky (Guest)

A
  • lots of time spent testifying in front of Congress
  • concern that you could lose in a court case that would take away the authority forever
  • challenge of wanting to regulate/make decisions/advise public on measures quickly
  • pressure to adopt measures that don’t actually do much from a public health standpoint
  • balance of what will stand up legally vs what might buy you time
  • difficult line between science + policy
  • data issues
26
Q

EO 13987 (Pandemic)

A
  • organizing admin. to respond
  • creates position of Coordinator of the COVID-19 Response
  • authority invoked is just the general “authority vested in me as President”
  • coordinating + creating, all staying w/in White House
27
Q

EO 13995 (Pandemic)

A
  • starting to reach beyond Executive Branch, but doesn’t touch private sector all that much -> likelihood of challenges relatively low
  • sets up COVID-19 Health Equity Task Force
28
Q

EO 13999 (Pandemic)

A
  • Protecting Worker Safety and Health
  • states different things that OSHA has to do (consider, review, coordinate)
  • “shall issue” guidance, but “consider” Emergency Temporary Standard (difference in mandate - one more obligatory)
    -> able to be more forceful w/ guidance b/c less likely to be challenged
  • also get a bit more info on Pres. authority (invoking OSHA Act)
    -> putting in motion things that will have consequences in the private sector -> need to be more cautious re what admin law standards will be applied to the ultimate actions
29
Q

EO 13945 (Pandemic)

A
  • “Fighting the Spread of COVID-19 by Providing Assistance to Renters and Homeowners”
  • “shall consider”, “shall identify” -> leaving room for agency to make the final decision
  • authority - still only relying on “vested in me”
  • category = the most intrusive one
30
Q

Alabama Association of Realtors - Factual Background Timeline

A
  • CARES Act - eviction moratorium expires July 2020
  • Aug. 2020 EO 13945 says consider moratorium -> Sept. 2020 CDC imposes one
  • Feb. 2021 CDC extends moratorium (end of Jan to end of March)
    -> around this time, the $ Congress originally provided in CARES Act runs out -> Am Rescue Act allocates more $ to rental assistance
  • End of March - CDC extends moratorium, not a lot of $ left + Congress pulling back from rental assistance
  • May 2021 - Dist Ct invalidates moratorium, issues stay while appealed -> DC Cir agrees w/ stay in June 2021 + SCOTUS refuses to vacate it
  • end of June 2021 - CDC extends one more month, but promises this is it, BUT Delta variant coming to forefront -> CDC extends until Oct 2021
31
Q

Ala Assoc. - Prof’s View of Convo Between Branches

A
  • concept of admin law as ongoing convo between branches of gov
  • in this case, Congress responded 1st, agency then filled in gaps when clear intervention needed for longer period
  • Ct comes into convo late in game, when the order is 1st challenged (was initially trying not to get involved) -> BUT Exec continues + ct ultimately says no
32
Q

Ala Assoc - Prof’s Points Re Reasoning

A
  • cite to Youngstown - arguing emergencies don’t extend President’s power
  • 3 months between when ct refused to invalidate stay + when they eventually did so -> nothing actually changed in Exec’s authority, but ct argues facts have changed (realtors’ interests have become greater + gov’s decreased)