Adducing witness evidence Flashcards
What are the stages of questioning a witness?
1 - examination in chief
2 - cross-examination
3 - re-examination
What are the restrictions on re-examination?
A - cannot ask leading questions
B - restricted to matters arising out of cross-examination (s 39(a))
C - other questions may not be put to W unless the court gives leave (s 39(b))
What is the first question to ask when seeking to call a witness?
Are they competent and compellable?
What is competence?
When the witness i allowed by the court to testify by giving sworn or unsworn evidence
What is compellability?
When the witness can be placed under a threat of punishment for failing to testify
What is the rule on competence?
2 parts:
(1) Every person is competent unless the court finds otherwise (s 12(a), 13(6))
(2) Competence is determined on a fact-by-fact basis - A person who is not competent to give evidence about one fact may still be competent to give evidence about other facts (s 13(2))
When is a person not competent?
A person is not competent if:
- No capacity to understand a question; OR
- No capacity to give an answer that can be understood
- AND the incapacity cannot be overcome
What is the rule on compellability?
A person who is competent to give evidence is compellable (s 12(b))
What are the exceptions to the rule on compellability?
- people with reduced capacity (s 14)
- Sovereigns (or foreign sovereign or Head of State) (s 15(1))
- Governor-General (s 15(1))
- Governor of a State (s 15(1))
Administrator of a Territory (s 15(1)) - Member of Parliament if giving evidence would prevent the member from attending a sitting of the House of Parliament or a meeting of a committee of that House (where they are a member of the committee)(s 15(2))
- judges and jurors in the proceeding (s 16)
- Defendant in criminal proceeding (s 17)
- Defendant’s spouse, de facto partner, parent or child - by objection (s 18(2))
When is a defendant competent and compellable?
- A defendant is not a competent witness for the prosecution (incl. prosecution for a co-accused) (s 17(2))
- A defendant is a competent (but not compellable) witness in own defence
- A defendant is competent, but not compellable to give evidence by an “associated defendant” with whom they are being jointly tried (s 17(3))
Are juror’s ever competent and/or compellable to give evidence?
Jurors are not compellable (s 16) but will be competent to give evidence about mattes affecting the proceeding (S 16(1))
Are judges ever competent and/or compellable to give evidence?
Judges are not compellable, (s 16) but judges and ex-judges can be given leave to give evidence about a proceeding they presided over (in Australia or overseas) (s 16(2))
When is a defendant’s spouse, de facto partner, parent or child compellable to give evidence as a witness for the prosecution?
Compellable if no objection is made under s 18(2). Can object under s 18(2) to giving evidence as a witness for the prosecution.
What are the rules for family member’s objecting to giving evidence for the prosecution?
- The objection must be taken before the person gives evidence (or as soon as practicable after they become aware of the right (s 18(3))
- Do not need to give evidence if the harm to the rship outweighs the desirability of having the evidence given (s 18(6))
– Court must determine whether there is a likelihood that harm would or might be caused (directly or indirectly) to the person, or the rship between the person and the defendant, if the person gives evidence (s 18(6)(a))
– If yes, must also determine whether the nature and extent of the harm outweighs the desirability of having the evidence given (s 18(6)(b))
How do you swear in a witness to give evidence?
The witness must give an oath or affirmation (s 21(1)) unless “called merely to produce a document or thing” (s 21(3)) or
giving unsworn evidence (s 21(2))
The witness can decide which (s 23)