ACVB Seminal Articles Flashcards
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
What was the study design?
Data were gathered on the behavioural and physiological characteristics of five cribbers, six weavers and six non-stereotypic (control) mature Thoroughbred geldings for a period of 16 weeks. The horses were hired from their owners and stabled individually throughout the trial. Cribbers and weavers had been known to stereotype for at least 12 months prior to commencement of the study. Behavioural data were collected using video surveillance.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
At what times did cribbers stereotype most frequently? What about weavers?
Cribbers stereotyped most frequently (P < 0.001) in the period 2–8 h following delivery of concentrated food, reinforcing the suggestion that diet is implicated in cribbing behaviour. Weavers stereotyped most frequently (P < 0.001) during periods of high environmental activity such as during routine pre-feeding activities and in the hour prior to daily turnout, presumably when anticipation and stimulation were at their highest levels.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
Did cribbers and weavers take more or less time to consume their feed compared to control horses?
Cribbers and weavers took longer than control horses to fully consume their ration, suggesting possible differences in motivation to feed, distress levels, satiety mechanisms or abdominal discomfort.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
How did oro-caecal transit time, digestibility, plasma cortisol concentration and heart rate vary between the cribbing/weaving horses and the control horses?
Physiological data were collected throughout the trial and there were no differences in oro-caecal transit time, digestibility, plasma cortisol concentration or heart rate among the three behavioural groups.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008. How do they define stereotypies?
Relatively invariant behaviour patterns with no apparent function.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
What percentage of stabled horses display stereotypies?
These authors reference Nicol. 1999. Proceedings of the BEVA Specialist Days on Behaviour and Nutrition.
Oral and locomotory stereotypies are common among
intensively managed horses, being reported in approximately 4% and 3% of the adult horse
population, respectively.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008. Numerous management techniques have been blamed for the development of stereotypies
in horses. Which are discussed in this paper?
These include confinement, isolation from other horses, provision of small concentrated feeds and both a lack of stimulation and
an over-abundance of environmental activity.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
The horses in this study were stabled for the average number of hours per day of stabled race horses. How long is that?
These authors reference McGreevy. 1994. Equine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians and Equine Scientists.
Horses spent 22 h per day in their stables, in accordance with usual confinement of a stabled race horse
(McGreevy, 2004).
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
How many times per day did cribbers crib?
Cribbers were observed to crib-bite 147.0 +/-33.1 times per daily period of observation. Since
horses were each only observed for 10% of the 22 h that they were in the stables each day
(132 min of observation per day in total), the actual cribbing frequency is likely to have been
approximately 1470 events per horse per day, assuming behaviour was evenly distributed
throughout each 5 min block.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
How many times per day did weavers weave?
Weavers were observed to weave 53.0 +/- 12.4 times per daily period of observation, equating to a daily weaving frequency of approximately 530 events per
horse.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
It is common to hear in the riding community that horses learn stereotypies through mimicry. Is this idea supported by the findings of this study?
No. No stereotypic behaviour was observed in any of the control horses in this study, despite visual contact with stereotypic horses. This short-term finding supports the research of Marsden (1995) and McGreevy (1999), which also suggest that horses do not learn these behaviours by mimicry.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
Do the authors believe that cribbing in their study can be explained by gastric pain?
Maybe. The finding that cribbers stereotype most frequently during and particularly following
consumption of meals supports the results of other researchers (Kennedy et al., 1993; Gillham
et al., 1994; McGreevy et al., 1995; McGreevy and Nicol, 1998a; Cooper et al., 2005). However,
the peak cribbing frequency in the current study began 2–4 h post-feeding and reached its highest
point 6–8 h post-feeding, which is a longer time-frame than previously reported. This suggests
that gastric pain was not the sole source of any visceral discomfort that cribbers underwent in the
current study. If cribbing is indeed a response to visceral discomfort, it appears more probable
from the current data, that it is related to fermentative acidosis in the hindgut, since the
commencement of the period of maximal post-feeding cribbing (between 2 and 8 h post-feeding)
coincided temporally with the initial arrival of ingesta in the caecum (approximately 110 min
post-feeding). That said, it is also possible
that there is a cumulative effect of concentrated food reaching the inflamed gastric lining,
resulting in greater discomfort as the horse continues to eat for up to 9 h after delivery of the
ration.
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
Do the authors report that cribbing increases or decreases oro-caecal transit time?
Cribbers tended to have a shorter oro-caecal transit time than control horses. This differs from
the findings of McGreevy and Nicol (1998b), who have suggested that cribbing may help to
shorten oro-caecal transit time in horses that would otherwise have a slow rate of passage through
the foregut, resulting in a decrease in their oro-caecal transit time to within a normal range. In the
current study, it is possible that cribbing may have shortened oro-caecal transit time even more
than has been reported previously
Clegg et al. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2008.
DO the findings of this study support the idea that cribbing occurs as a result of a horses unmet need to forage (motivation to display foraging behavior when no feed is available)?
No. The theory that cribbing occurs in stabled horses as a result of a behavioural need to
feed is questioned by this research, particularly as cribbing occurred while feed was still
available.
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
Free-living domestic cats form social groups. Who are these groups typically composed of?
Females who are usually related and their offspring. Female kinship is basis of group formation.
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
Allogrooming in cats occurs as part of:
- Mating (Bradshaw/Cameron-Beaumont)
- Mother-young interactions (same authors)
- Between sexually intact adult cats that are not mother-offspring pairs
- Between all sex combos
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
What is function of allogrooming?
Primarily social, except when young kittens groomed by Mom
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
What was a relative equivalent in this study?
Cat who was not related to the focal cat but who had been in the colony for the same amount of time as the focal cat
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
What was the stipulation when the term “related” was used to describe the cats studied in the colony?
Only referred to matrilineal relationships b/c paternity was unknown for these cats
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
The number of times a cat was within 1 meter of a focal cat (the individual cat who was being observed by the researchers) and allogroomed by a given cat was significantly associated with what?
Being a relative and familiarity between cats (ie, how long they had lived together)
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
What was the difference between cats with relatives who were present in the colony for 7 months and cats with relatives who were present in the colony for 76 months?
of times relative was within 1 m and mean # of times nonrelative cat was within 1 m of focal cat was lower for cats who knew each other for 7 months vs cats who knew each other 76 months
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
What was the difference in the # of times a cat was within 1 m of the focal cat and # of times a cat was groomed by the focal cat between relative cats vs relative equivalent cats?
Relative cats were more likely to be within 1 m than relative equivalents; relatives were groomed significantly more likely than relative equivalents
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
How much more frequent was the mean # of grooming events with a relative cat than with relative equivalent?
6.3 times
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
What was the commonality in all 6 of the cats who groomed relatives more than non-relatives?
They were all from groups in which the mother was present in the colony
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
What were the main findings of this study?
- Allogrooming serves social function to establish and maintain affiliative relationships. Not just hygienic function.
- Cats in this colony preferentially remained near and allogroomed their relatives and cats with who they were more familiar more than nonrelatives and cats with who they were less familiar.
- Longer unrelated cats live together, the more they groom each other and spend time together.
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
What relationship did Barry and Crowell-Davis find between the length of time cats cohabitated and rate of aggression?
Inverse. Longer unrelated cats live together, the less aggression.
Curtis, Knowles, Crowell-Davis 2003. AJVR.
What was a limitation in this study regarding the contact between cats prior to the study?
The cats with relatives spent time with their relatives during socialization prior to introduction to the colony. No nonrelatives were kept together during this period. Strong social bonding with these cats may have occurred if there had been contact.
MEMO Buffington:
In what journal and what year was the Buffington MEMO study published? (Clinical Evaluation of MEMO in the management of cats with idiopathic cystitis)
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 2006
MEMO Buffington:
What was included in the client education to adjust in the environment of the cats in the study?
physical environment
diet (change to wet food)
interactions with other cats
minimize stress from other animals in the home
minimize stress from humans in the cat’s environment
MEMO Buffington:
What type of study was it?
prospective observational study (a study design in which the documentation of the presence or absence of an exposure of interest is documented at a time period preceding the onset of the condition being studied)
MEMO Buffington:
What was the methodology of the study?
46 client-owned indoor-housed cats with FIC diagnosed based on a history of recurrent LUTS (2 bouts of LUTS in past 10 months) referred to Ohio State U CVM. Interviewed clients and then educated on MEMO, and followed up for 10 months.
MEMO Buffington:
What were the significant results in which MEMO improved in the study?
Significant (P < 0.05) reductions in LUTS, fearfulness, nervousness, signs referable to the respiratory tract
MEMO Buffington:
What were the most commonly followed recommendations of clients in the study?
- Read the client education
- Increase amount of time interacting with the cat
- Change to a canned diet
- Add another litterbox.
- Change letterbox location and cleaning frequency
- Address inter-cat conflict
MEMO Buffington:
What percentage of cats did not experience any LUTS int he 10 months of f/u in the study after implementation of MEMO?
70-75% of the cats had no observable signs
MEMO Buffington:
According to this study, what illnesses are more common in indoor cats
Behavioral problems (Heidenberger 1997 diabetes (Rand et al 2004) dental disease hyperthyroidism obesity separation anxiety disorder urolithiasis (Buffington 2002)
MEMO Buffington:
How were cats excluded from this study?
Urinalysis r/o UTI
Abdominal rad r/o urolithiasis
MEMO Buffington:
Was a canned diet beneficial in the 14/46 cats in this study who tried it? How many cats experienced recurrence?
0/4 cats in single cat home experienced recurrence vs 4/10 cats in multicast homes experienced recurrence
What journal and year was the Dodman paper on Dominance Aggression published?
Dodman, N. H., et al. “Use of fluoxetine to treat dominance aggression in dogs.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 209.9 (1996): 1585-1587.
APA
Dodman 1996:
According to Borchelt 1985 what is another name for dominance aggression?
social dominance
Dodman 1996:
According to this paper, what is the goal of dominance aggression for the dog?
It is a form of “affective aggression” that serves to preserve status, self, and resources
Dodman 1996:
What was the study style/set up?
Single-blind crossover study; placebo-controlled blind. Dogs various breeds/ages (9 months to 6 yrs) treated w/ placebo for 1 week, then fluox 1 mg/kg for 4 weeks
Dodman 1996:
Name some major limitations to this study
8/9 dogs were male, only 1 female
Small sample size
Dodman 1996:
What were the significant findings from this study?
Fluoxetine caused significant reduction in owner-directed aggression after 3 weeks of tx.
Dodman 1996:
The statistical test used in this study was Wilcoxon’s test. Is this a parametric or non-parametric statistical test?
Wilcoxon’s test is non-parametric. Non parametric is usually means that you know the population data does not have a normal distribution.
Dodman 1996: How many dogs experienced adverse events in the fluoxetine period vs control period?
6/9 dogs during fluox phase, 4/9 in placebo phase. decreased daytime activity (2 dogs) Increased daytime activity (1) Increased nocturnal activity 1 Decreased food intake 2 Increased food 1 Decreased water intake 1 Increased alertness/responsiveness 2 Shaking 2 Increased barking 2 Reclusion 1
Dodman 1996:
As referenced in this paper, effective programs of behavior modification can cause how significant a reduction in aggression per Reisney 1994?
62% reduction
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What are pheromones?
Nonvolatile or ephemeral (lasting very short time) chemicals that activate vomeronasal organ neurons or main olfactory epithelium neurons (2,3)
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What factors were used to assess methodological quality?
- 3 parameters used to address risk for biased estimates of treatment effect (randomization - generalization and concealment of allocation to treatment groups, masking, attrition)
- Grading of evidence quality based on type of study (blinded RCT > controlled trial lacking blinding or clear randomization > cohort study > case control, case series, descriptive study, case report
- # study subjects per group
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What factors were used to assess subject enrollment quality?
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What factors were used to assess outcome measures?
- % complete or near complete remission, % partial remission, relapse rate
- Used to determine effect size (number measuring the strength of the relationship between two variables in a population or a sample-based estimate of that quantity)
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What was the grading system used to report qualitative results?
- > 1 report, including at least 1 well designed RCT, yielded sufficient outcome details to support high efficacy of pheromone treatment: considered good evidence for recommending use of the treatment
- At least 1 well designed RCT revealed medium to high efficacy: fair evidence for recommending
- When well designed RCTs not available or when multiple studies yielded controversial evidence of treatment effect: insufficient evidence to recommend
- When >/= 1 well designed study or several less detailed studies revealed lack of efficacy: fair evidence against recommending
- When > 1 study, including at least 1 well designed RCT, revealed lack of efficacy: good evidence against recommending
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
** You will need to refer to notes on studies that were included in this review **
What were the types of studies in the synthetic FFP review?
- RCT involving placebo (22- IVC placement)
- 3 blinded placebo-controlled trials lacking clear randomization (19,21,23- 1 urine spraying, 1 case series within same report)
- 3 case series (17,18,20- all urine spraying)
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
In the 3 reports (Frank 1999, Hunthauseen 2000, Ogata 2001) on urine spraying that compared synthetic FFP treatment to pretreatment, the median number of urine marks decreased by what factor after FFP compared to pretreatment?
Median # of urine marks decreased 2.7-6 fold compared to pretreatment #s (17,18,20)
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
In the placebo controlled study from Mills 2001, the mean # of spraying incidents decreased by what factor in treated cats vs controls?
Mean # of spraying incidents decreased by 2.3 fold in FFP treated cats
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What was the range in complete or nearly complete remission in Frank 1999, Hunthausen 1000, Ogata 2001?
10-37%
Was not applicable in 22,23 and not reported in 19,21
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What was the range in partial clinical remission in the urine spraying studies?
36-74%
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
In Mills 2001 Vet Rec (placebo-controlled trial), the frequency of urine spraying by week 4 had decreased from the pretreatment frequency by what % in placebo cats and what percent in FFP cats?
58% placebo cats, 80% FFP cats
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What was the % range of treatment failure in Frank 1999, Hunthausen 2000, Mills 2001, Ogata 2001?
9-23%
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What were the adverse effects seen in Ogata 2001 J Vet Med Sci in cats receiving synthetic FFP?
4 cats (11% showed increased aggression or unfriendliness on FFP compared to prior to treatment
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
Was there a significant effect of FFP on FIC in Gunn-Moore 2004?
No
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What did Griffith 2000 JAVMA show regarding FFP effects on mean food intake in hospitalized cats compared with placebo?
No sig difference in first study
In second study, 24 hour food intake was sig greater (by factor of 2.9) in hospitalized cats exposed to cat carrier and FFP within hospital cage than cats exposed to pheromone alone without carrier in cage
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What was a major limitation of the Kronen 2006 Vet Anesth Analg study on the effects of FFP during IVC placement?
Acepromazine was given to about ½ the cats
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
** Refer to notes for list of DAP studies reviewed in this article **
What were the types of studies included in the review on DAP?
- 4 reports (16,27-29) were placebo-controlled studies that lacked clear treatment allocation concealment process, with 2 having inadequate random allocation generalization
- 3 were case series (24-26)
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
In the Sheppard 2003 Vet Rec study, partial clinical remission was seen in what % of dogs?
22/30 (73%)
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What was a major limitation of evaluating the efficacy of DAP in the study by Sheppard 2003 Vet Rec for noise (fireworks) phobia?
Anxiolytics or sedates were administered PRN to an unknown # of the dogs in the study
DAP was the only product used in Tod 2005 AABS, Levine 2007 AABS, Taylor 2007 AABS
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What was a major limitation in evaluating efficacy of DAP in Levine 2007 AABS, the study on DAP use for treatment of fireworks phobia?
Bmod (desensitization to noise stimuli) was used in combo with DAP, and no effort was made to separate the effects of each
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What did Mills 2006 AABS show regarding the effects of DAP on behavior in the waiting room and exam room?
DAP increased relaxation of dogs by factor of 3 and decreased anxiety by factor of 1.2 compared with placebo in the waiting room
DAP decreased anxiety duration by factor of 1.8 and increased visitation of room edges by factor of 1.2 in exam room
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What did Tod 2005 AABS show regarding DAP use during a walking test compared to a placebo?
DAP dogs had a sig reduction in barking by factor of 1.3 compared to placebo
No sig effects for neutral-stranger test
Treatment sig decreased barking by factor of 4 compared to pretreatment
But not clear what happened in control group
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What did Taylor 2007 AABS show were the effects of DAP on disturbed nights and housesoiling in recently adopted puppies?
DAP reduced disturbed nights (vocalization, scratching at door) by factor of 3 compared with placebo
Sleeping with another dog at night reduced nighttime disturbance
No sig effect of DAP on housesoiling
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What did Denenberg/Landsberg 2008 JAVMA show regarding the effect of DAP on fear and anxiety of puppies during training and socialization?
Excitability scores and degree of fear in DAP group were smaller by factor of 2 compared with control
Socialization scores higher by factor of 1.5 in DAP group 12 months after assessment
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
Of the studies reviewed in this article, only 1 (Kronen 2006 Vet Anesth Analg) was a RCT while 7 (16,19,21,23,27-29) were blinded, controlled studies lacking clear randomization. What do the authors conclude about the relevance of these latter studies?
They have minimal value to assess treatment effects
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What are some factors that can cause selection bias?
Inappropriate randomization, inclusion and exclusion criteria, nature of studies selected, language of studies
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
Animals being treated with meds in addition to the pheromone is a type of what bias?
Performance bias
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
Why might attrition bias arise?
Deviations from study protocols, loss to follow up (refusal to continue participating, loss of contact, development of adverse effects of medical issues that justify withdrawal)
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What factors affect external validity of a study?
Subject selection, nature and duration of treatments administered, assessed modalities of outcome
Ie, poorly defined or vague inclusion criteria, variable treatment durations, dosage variations between studies and within same study, other elements like environmental changes, additional drugs, bmod, reliance on subjective evaluation of owners
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
The chemical structures of FFP and DAP are unknown. What do the authors believe is the chemical responsible for the attractant and anxiolytic effects of synthetic FFP?
V officinalis extract
Actinidine: basis for attraction of some cats to valerian root
V officinalis extract and valerenic acid modulate GABA-A receptor (increases availability of GABA by inhibiting its uptake by as much as 50%, decreases its degradation, increases its release by induction of Ca2+ channels)
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
Why do the authors believe that the success rates for FFP on urine-spraying cats is overestimated?
Dropouts were not included
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What do the authors conclude regarding the evidence for the use of FFP in hospitalized cats in Griffith 2000 JAVMA?
Lack of support of efficacy of FFP, fair evidence against use for hospitalized cats
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What did the authors conclude about the efficacy of DAP for the treatment of fireworks phobia in Sheppard 2003 Vet Rec and Levine 2007 AABS?
Insufficient evidence that DAP is effective in this context
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What did the authors conclude about the efficacy of DAP for the treatment of stress and fear related behaviors in shelter dogs in Tod 2005 Appl Anim Beh?
Insufficient evidence
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What did the authors conclude about the efficacy of DAP for the treatment of housesoiling in Taylor 2007 AABS?
Evidence is against its use for this purpose
Frank/Beauchamp/Palestrini 2010. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. JAVMA.
What did the authors conclude about the efficacy of DAP for the treatment of fear and socialization of puppies during training in Denenberg 2008 JAVMA?
Some evidence that DAP reduces fear or anxiety of puppies during training and results in better socialization
Gillham/Dodman 1994. The effect of diet on cribbing behavior and plasma B-endorphin in horses. AABS.
Endogenous opioids are linked to the development of what in several spp including horses, dogs, rats, swine and humans?
Stereotypic behaviors
Gillham/Dodman 1994. The effect of diet on cribbing behavior and plasma B-endorphin in horses. AABS.
Dodman 1987 found that cribbing horses fed sweetened grain rations showed and increase or decrease in stereotypic behaviors?
Increase
Gillham/Dodman 1994. The effect of diet on cribbing behavior and plasma B-endorphin in horses. AABS.
What effect has been shown to be produced including in animals that don’t exhibit stereotypies when fed highly palatable foods?
Naloxone-reversible analgesia (Roane/Martin 1990, Rushen 1990, Blass/Hoffmeyer 1991)
Gillham/Dodman 1994. The effect of diet on cribbing behavior and plasma B-endorphin in horses. AABS.
What were the different feeds given to the 11 horses in this study?
Alfalfa (high fiber), sweetened grain (sweet feed), pellet feed (high protein)