Actus Reus Flashcards
What is actus reus?
Acts of the defendant and their consequences.
The defendant must have been proved to have done/failed to do, in what circumstances and under what consequences.
Ø Physical element
Ø External element
Ø Requires some activity on the part of the accused.
Ø Both voluntary act and consequent act.
Yet sometimes the accused isn’t active, the omission can satisfy the actus reus.
What is mens rea?
Required mental state of the defendant.
Ø A defendant is only guilty if the act was voluntary/purposeful. Ø People can be guilty of an omission if they had a duty to act. Ø Only if both the actus reus and the mens rea are proved, will the defendant be guilty. Mental element
What three aspects does the actus rea of a crime involve?
Ø Proof the defendant did a particular act.
Ø Proof the act caused a particular result.
Proof the act occurred under certain circumstances.
What are conduct crimes?
Where the conduct used is the offence and there is no required result element such as, theft.
What are result crimes?
Proof that the act produced certain results such as, murder/manslaughter.
What are the voluntary Act requirements?
Ø Many offences require proof of this.
Ø Some offences can be committed via omission, proof of a state of affairs, in respect of the actions of another.
Automatism means the defendant will not be guilty.
What are omissions?
Ø No criminal liability, except when there is a duty to act.
Guilty when: under a duty, breached a duty, the harm of an individual. (3)
What are statutory crimes?
> Statutory duties.
Contractual duties.
Assumed duties.
If you own property, and someone commits a crime in your property/using your property in your presence, are you guilty?
The owner Is expected to have sought to prevent that crime.
If someone creates danger, what becomes their duty?
They must stop the danger/mitigate the damage.
What is required if there is a duty to act?
Act reasonably.
Act as an ordinary person would.
If the omission will not cause the result, they are innocent.
What is novus actus interveniens?
The intervention of a third party, whose voluntary actions renders the original act as no longer a significant cause for harm.
What is a concurrent cause?
Both people’s actions led to the harm.
What cannot break the chain of causation?
Omissions from a third party.
What can break the chain of causation?
Freak nature.