Actus reus Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the literal translation of actus reus ?

A

guilty action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What can 3 things can constitute an actus reus?

A
  1. An act
  2. An omission
  3. A state of affairs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are ‘state of affairs’ crimes?

A

Where allowing a state of affairs which is illegal conduct continue. Such as possession of a weapon in a public place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What must the actus reus be for it to be considered a crime?

A

Actus reus must be voluntary - but there have been exceptions RV Larsonneur (1933)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case demonstrates that even someone involuntarily inflicting harm on a third party due to the actions of the first party has not necessarily committed a crime?

A

RV Mitchell (1983)
Facts: D pushed someone into V (who died from injuries). D convicted of unlawful act manslaughter. Man who was pushed was not charged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

RV Mitchel (1983)
What does this case demonstrate regarding voluntariness of actus reus?

A

Demonstrates: that even if someone is pushed into someone else causing harm to the latter person then they are not necessarily guilty of a crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case shows a rare instance where D can be convicted of an offence they didn’t voluntarily commit?

A

RV Larsonneur (1933)
Facts: D had been ordered to leave UK and went to Ireland. Ireland didn’t want her either so she was deported to the UK and arrested immediately for being an illegal alien.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

RV Larsonneur (1933)
What does this case demonstrate regarding the actus reus of a crime?

A

Demonstrates: a rare circumstance where D can be found guilty of an offence even though they did not voluntarily commit the act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the circumstances in which a duty exists, therefore meaning someone must act to protect an individual?

A

1) Statutory duty
2) Contractual duty
3) Relationship duty
4) Voluntarily assumed duty
5) Positional duty
6) Because D set in a chain of events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Omissions constituting an actus reus.
2) Contractual duty
Case example?

A

RV Pittwood (1902)
Facts: Rail crossing guard failed to close gate, leading to the death of a pedestrian. Keeper found guilty of manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Omissions constituting an actus reus.
3) Relationship duty.
Case example?

A

RV Gibbins and Proctor (1918)
Facts: Father of young girl purposefully neglected to feed her and she died-step mum also found guilty because she was held to have undertaken the task of caring for the child.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What can cause a novus actus interveniens?

A
  1. D’s own actions
  2. Actions of a third party
  3. An unforeseen natural event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Omissions constituting an actus reus.
4) Voluntarily assumed duty
Case example?

A

RV Gibbins and Proctor (1918)
Facts: Specifically referring to the step mum, she had voluntarily assumed the duty of caring for the young girl who died.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Omissions constituting an actus reus.
5) Positional duty
Case example?

A

RV Dytham (1979)
Facts: D was police officer on duty who witnessed a man being beaten to death but did not act-D found to have neglected his
duty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Omissions constituting an actus reus.
6) D set in motion a chain of events
Case example?

A

RV Miller (1983)
Facts: D was a squatter who fell asleep smoking and when he awoke to find his mattress on fire, simply changed beds-D found guilty of arson.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What case is an example of the ‘but for’ principle?

A

RV Pagett (1983)
Facts: D used GF as a human shield and she died. D found guilty of manslaughter because the gir wouldn’t have died ‘but for’ his actions.

17
Q

What is the ‘but for’ principle?

A

It is a factual cause where the result wouldn’t have occurred ‘but for’ the actions of D.