Accomplices Cases Flashcards
1
Q
R v Coney [1882]
A
mere association or presence does not amount to complicity
2
Q
R v Collinson [1831]
A
D1 and D2 must have common illegal purpose
3
Q
R v Wesley Smith [1831]
A
D1 and D2 may have different foresight which could reduce D2’s charge
4
Q
R v Anderson and Morris [1966]
A
there must be an overwhelmingly supervening event that goes beyond what was agreed upon to dissolve D2 liability
5
Q
R v Jogee [2016]
A
foresight is evidence of intention but not proof of it, joint enterprise does not mean guilty by association
