Accomplice Liability & Inchohate Offenses Flashcards
An accomplice is:
One who aids, advises or encourages the principal in commission of a crime
Accomplices must have:
the requisite intent that the crime be committed
Accomplices are liable for:
- the crime committed
- and all foreseeable crimes
Accomplices & Withdrawal
- if one encouraged the crime, he must repudiate the encouragement
- if he aided the principle, he must neutralize the assistance
- an alternate means of withdrawing is contacting the police
Incohate means
Incomplete
3 incohate offenses:
- Solicitation
- Conspiracy
- Attempt
Soliciation
- is the asking of someone to commit a crime
- the crime of solicitation ends once you have asked
Solicitation under common law requires:
that you actually agree to do it
What if someone agrees to commit the crime?
Then it becomes conspiracy and it merges into conspiracy
What is not a defense to soliciation
Factual Impossibility
Conspiracy Elements:
- An agreement
- with intent to agree
- with an intent to pursue an unlawful objective
Conspiracy and Mergers
Conspiracy does not merge - therefore you can be charged with the crime and the conspiracy to commit the crime
Liability for Co-Conspirator Crimes:
Each co-conspirator is liable for all of the crimes committed by other conspirators if:
- they were in furtherance of the conspiracy
and
- were foreseeable
Agreement & Intent required for conspiracies:
- The agreement need not be express
- Intent can be inferred from conduct
2 approaches to conspiracy
- bilateral approach
- unilateral approach
- Is MPC Bilateral or Unilateral for Conspiracy?
- Is Common Law Bilateral or Unilateral for Conspiracy?
- MPC = unilateral
- Common Law = bilateral
Bilateral approach to conspiracy
- Common Law approach
- requires 2 guilty parties
- thus if one person doesn’t agree, the other cannot be convicted of conspiracy
Unilateral Approach to Conspiracy:
- MPC
- requires that only one person have a general intent
Majority Rules and Minority Rules: Common Law & MPC
- Majority = MPC
- Minority = Common Law
Overt Act Requirement
Minority/Majority Approaches
- :Majority (MPC) rule for conspiracy requires
- agreement + Overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy
- Common Law (Minority) does not require an overt act, just an agreement
What constitutes an overt act?
any little act (even mere preparation)
What is not a defense to conspiracy?
Factual Impossibility
Withdrawl from Conspiracy
- can never relieve the D of liability to the conspiracy itself
- D can withdraw from liability of the other conspirators subsequent crimes
Attempt Elements
- specific intent
- overt act
in furtherance of the crime
Overt Act for Attempt:
- must be a substantial step in furtherance of the commission of the crime
- thus mere preperation cannot ground liability
Abandonment Defense to Attempt
- majority (MPC) says that once a substantial step has been taken, abandonment is never a defense
- MPC only allows for the defense when
- fully voluntary
- and a complete renunciation of criminal purpose
What is and what isn’t an Impossibility defense to Attempt:
- Factual Impossibility = not a defense
- Legal Impossibility = is a defense