Accomplice Liability Flashcards
What are the act AND mental state requirements for an accomplice for accomplice liability to attach?
NOTE: NY Distinction
Act req = an accomplice must aid OR encourage the principal
Mental state req = accomplice must act with the intent that the CRIME be committed
NY DISTINCTION: In NY, the accomplice need NOT specifically intend that the crime be committed; it is SUFFICIENT that the accomplice intends to aid the principal’s CONDUCT (i.e. you can be an accomplice to a negligence or recklessness crime)
For what crimes is an accomplice liable?
1) ALL crimes that he aids or encourages (just as if he did them); AND
2) ALL other foreseeable crimes committed along w/ the aided crimes
Under what 3 circumstances can a person NOT be an accomplice?
NOTE: NY Distinction
1) He’s merely present at the scene of the crime (he MUST actively aid/encourage the principal)
2) He has mere knowledge of the crime (he must INTEND to aid/encourage the principal)
NY DISTINCTION: Mere knowledge CAN make someone guilty of the (lesser) crime of “criminal facilitation”
3) He’s a victim of the crime (they are a protected class) E.g., minors cannot be convicted of “selling alcohol to minors”
How can an accomplice withdraw to avoid criminal liability?
NOTE: NY Distinction
Depends on how the accomplice assisted the principal…
1) Encourager: can withdraw simply by repudiating the encouragement BEFORE the crime is committed
2) Aider: must EITHER neutralize the assistance OR otherwise prevent the crime from happening (e.g. by calling the cops)
NY DISTINCTION: In NY “renunciation” is an affirmative defense (burden is on ∆)
The accomplice MUST make a substantial effort to prevent the commission of the crime
What are the 3 elements of accessory after the fact? NOTE: NY Distinction
∆ must…
1) help a principal who has committed a felony;
2) w/ knowledge that the crime has been committed; AND
3) w/ the intent to help the principal avoid arrest or conviction
NY DISTINCTION: In NY, CL accessory after the fact has been codified into the statutory crime of “hindering prosecution”