Accessory after the Fact Flashcards

1
Q

What is A.A.T.F

A

A person who assists offender, or destroys or tampers with evidence to help offender avoid arrest or conviction or escape after arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Legislation

A

s71 C.A 61
1) a.a.t.f is one who, knowing person to have been party to offence, receives, comforts or assists person or tampers with or actively suppresses evidence to avoid arrest/conviction or escape after arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Penalty section

A

s312 C.A 61
Everyone who is a.a.t.f to any imprisonable offence, & offence has no express provision for punishment, is liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 10 years if life imprisonment offence, or not exceeding 5 years if 10+ year imprisonment offence. Any other cases penalty is no more than half max penalty of offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Elements - what needs to be proved

A
  • person who is received, comforted, assisted by accessory is a party to offence committed.
  • at time of, accessory knows person was party to offence.
  • accessory received, comforted, assisted person or tampered with/actively suppressed evidence
  • at time of, accessory’s purpose was to enable person to escape after arrest, or avoid arrest or conviction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Party

A

Any person involved in any of or all stages of preparing, attempting or actually committing offence. Includes anyone who incites, counsels another to commit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Offence/Crime

A

Words used interchangeably & no material difference. Means any act or omission punishable on conviction under any enactment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Offence must be complete

A

To be accessory must occur after offence is complete.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Mane

A

To be considered an accessory after the fact, acts must be done after completion of offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Knowing to be a party

A

Simester and brookbanks outlines knowing to know or correctly believe. Belief must be correct, where belief is wrong someone cannot know something.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Crooks

A

Knowing means actual knowledge or belief in the sense of having no real doubt that the person assisted was a party to the relevant offence. Mere suspicion is not sufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Knowing

A

At the time of assistance, accessory must possess
- knowledge offence committed, and,
- person assisted is a party

Where knowledge comes after assistance given, not liable as an accessory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Briggs

A

Knowledge may also be inferred from wilful blindness or deliberate abstention from making inquiries to confirm suspicion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Wilful blindness

A

Considered wilfully blind in 2 situations.
1. Deliberately shuts eyes and fails to inquire because knew what the answer would be.
2. Situations where knowledge easily at hand and person realises likely truth of the matter but refrains from inquiry to not know

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Actus reus

A

Must do deliberate act with purpose of assisting to evade justice in one of 3 ways (s71)
- escape after arrest
- avoid arrest
- avoid conviction

Intentional acts are:
Receives/comforts/assists/tampers w evidence/actively suppress evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Receiving/comforting

A

Harbouring or offering shelter, comforting encompasses situations where accessory provides offender with food and clothing etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Assisting

A

Covers significant number of situations:
- provide transport/act as lookout/identify willing buyer for stolen property/ deliberately supply false info

17
Q

Evade justice

A

GIBBS outlines that act/s done by accessory must have helped other person in some way to evade justice

18
Q

Tampers with

A

to alter evidence against offender - eg modify telephone records

19
Q

Actively suppress

A

Act of concealing or destroying evidence against offender - eg washing bloodied clothes or burning clothing

20
Q

Attempt to be accessory

A

Possible to be convicted of attempts to be accessory after the fact. In R v DH charged and convicted with attempted to be a.a.t.f of murder by assisting in an unsuccessful attempt to dispose of murder weapon

21
Q

Indirect assistance

A

No requirement that offender is directly assisted by accessory. Eg, person A assisted by Person B, person B assisted by person C, therefore person C indirectly assisted person A

22
Q

Innocent agent

A

Where innocent agent employed by the accessory, the actions of innocent agent will be held to be actions of accessory

23
Q

Accessory’s attempt

A

Intent held at the time of the act must be: avoid arrest/avoid conviction/escape after arrest

Mere knowledge that likely to assist is insufficient. Intent does not need to be dominant reason but must be present.

24
Q

Prosecution - charging

A

s137 C.A 62
Proceedings against parties to/accessories/receivers
1. Applies to everyone charged as party/being accessory/receiving stolen property
2. ss(1) may be proceeded against/convicted whether or not principal offender proceeded against
3. ss(1) may be proceeded against alone for substantive offence or jointly
4. If receiver, any number of receivers at different times in respect of property may be charged

25
Q

Proof of principal offence

A

In R v Mane court held accessory is entitled to insist in proof of alleged offence committed, and applied even if principal offender plead guilty and/or convicted, must still prove where required.

26
Q

Acquittal of offender

A

Accessory can still be convicted despite offender acquitted.
(Eg principal offender statement inadmissible causing acquittal, but accessory evidence still proves offence).