Accessory after the Fact Flashcards
Section and Penalty
CA61; S71(1)
Penalty (S312)
7 years (for life imprisonment offences)
5 years (for offences imprisonable by 10 years+ )
1/2 penalty (of the offence if less than 10 years)
Elements
- Any one who
- Knowing any person to be a party to an offence
- Receives, comforts or assists that person;
OR tampers with;
OR actively suppresses any evidence against him or her; - In order to help him or her to escape after arrest;
OR to avoid arrest OR conviction.
Person
Carries its natural meaning. Gender neutral. Proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence.
Knowledge - Crooks stole some books
(We know Crooks stole some books from the library. We are an AATF if we receive Crooks etc etc. Crooks loves his books and can’t help himself).
“Knowing” means “knowing, or correctly believing” … a person may believe something wrongly but cannot ‘know’ something that is false.
R v Crooks:
Knowledge means actual knowledge or belief in the sense of having no real doubt that the person assisted was a party to the relevant offence. Mere suspicion of their involvement in the offence is insufficient.
R v Briggs
(Briggs - Blindness - Wilful Blindness)
R v Briggs
As with a receiving charge under s246(1), knowledge may also be inferred from wilful blindness or a deliberate abstention from making inquiries that would confirm the suspected truth.
When would a person be considered wilfully blind?
- Where a person deliberately shuts their eyes and fails to inquire; this is because they knew what the answer would be; or
- In situations where the means of knowledge are easily at hand and the person realises the likely truth of the matter but refrains from inquiring in order not to know.
What knowledge must an accessory possess?
At the time of the assistance given, he or she must have knowledge that:
• an offence has been committed AND
• the person they are assisting was a party (principal or secondary) to that offence.
Party
Legislation
CA61; S66:
(1) Every one is a party to and guilty of an offence who—
(a) actually commits the offence; or
(b) does or omits an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the offence; or
(c) abets any person in the commission of the offence; or
(d) incites, counsels, or procures any person to commit the offence.
Definition of Offence/Crime
CA61; S2
Any act or omission that is punishable on conviction under any enactment, and are demarcated into four categories within s6, Criminal Procedures Act 2011.
What is the actus reus of being an accessory after the fact?
- Receives
- Comforts
- Assists
- Tampers with evidence
- Actively suppresses evidence
R v Mane
(You need to remain and assist those who committed the offence in order to be considered an accessory.
R v Mane
To be considered an accessory the acts done by the person must be after the completion of the offence.
Receives, Comforts or Assists
Not interpreted by the Courts in their literal sense so here are some examples
Receives:
Refers to harbouring an offender or offering them shelter can be considered receiving and/or comforting, eg hiding a prison escapee in a basement.
Comforts:
Refers to providing food, clothing, shelter, accommodation, or other supplies to an offender.
Assists:
Refers to providing transport, acting as a look out, identifying someone willing to purchase stolen property as a receiver and deliberately providing authorities with false information as to an offender’s whereabouts. Giving advice, information, material or services to the offender is also captured.
R v Gibbs
(acts done must have helped in some way to evade justice)
The act or acts done by the accessory must have helped the other person in some way to evade justice.
Tampers with or actively suppresses evidence
Definitions and examples
Tampers with:
Means to alter the evidence against the offender eg, modifying an offender’s phone records to conceal communications that might implicate them.
Actively suppresses evidence:
Encompasses acts of concealing or destroying evidence against an offender eg, bloodied clothing is washed repeatedly to remove evidence or it is set alight to destroy the clothing.
R v Levy
(Levy broke the levee in order to wash the evidence away to assist his mate in evading justice)
It was held that Levy had done a deliberate act in relation to the evidence against the offender for the purpose of assisting that offender to evade justice.