Accession Flashcards

1
Q

accession definition

A
  • industrial or natural joining
  • some components ( accessory)
  • lose legal identity
  • incorporated into principal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

accession consequence

A
  • owner of principal = owner of accessory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

General requirements of Accession

A
  • corporeal things
  • addition / join between two or more things
  • composite thing
  • must be permanent/indefinite
  • must be able to identify principal and accessory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Movable to movable requirements

A
  • principal and accessory must be identifiable
  • join must be permanent (sufficient join indicating permanency)
  • indefinite join inferred ( mental)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

tests for movable to movable

A
  • value: most valuable = principal
  • bulk/mass= principal
  • character form and function ( Khan)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Khan

A
  • court first considered bulk and mass
  • decided not to use
  • character form and function test = principal
  • stolen rear end = principal
  • does not regard other tests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

movables to movables explanation

A
  • always human or industrial intervention
  • to bring about join
  • difficult to determine principal and accessory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

movables to movables determine

A
  • whether things are movable or immovable
  • increase or join to form composite thing
  • identify principal and accessory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

planting and sowing

A
  • all planted in seeds accede to soil
  • owner of soil owns plants
  • accession occurs when plants take root and draw nourishment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

planting and sowing: nursery

A
  • plants never intended to remain permanently in soil
  • accession did not occur
  • business of nursery that plants remain movables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

planting in ignorance

A
  • owner claims compensation for plants acceded
  • claim labor costs
  • rooted plants = owner of the land
  • different outcomes based on different circumstances i.e lease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

building starting point

A
  • everything built on land = part of land
  • land is principal thing
  • owner of land = owns that attached to land
  • building accession : factual circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

building underlying principles

A
  • publicity

- protection of ownership ( reluctant to say accession occurred)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

building requirements

A
  • attachment must indicate permanency

- show this on a BoP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

factors for building

A
  1. nature and purpose of movable
  2. manner and degree of attachment
  3. intention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

intention traditional approach

A
  • court relied on objective assessment of first 2 factors for intention
  • if answer to factor 1 + 2 is clear = accession
  • if not clear then look to the intention
17
Q

new approach

A
  • subjective intention
  • first two factors = inferred objective intention
  • weighed up against ipse dixit (oral evidence or contract)
  • determine real / actual intention
18
Q

macdonald

A
  • considered 3 requirements
  • did not meet permanency requirement
  • retained right of ownership on default payment
  • however removal not difficult / expensive
  • 1+2 not clear so had to look at intention
  • never intended to relinquish ownership
  • no accession
19
Q

Theatre investments

A
  • must look to subjective intention (ipse dixit)
  • 1+ 2 = objective/ considered amongst other factors
  • absence of intention: court decide for themselves
  • considered nature: chairs specifically designed for theatre, removing them would change fabric of building
  • lighting and dimmer board: essential features assumed they would be permanent
  • would be difficult to remove
  • terms of lease: expected to remain there for a long time
  • permanent and indefinite = accession
20
Q

Melcorp

A
  • inferred intention or express intention?
  • in this case seemed to differ
  • subjective intention clearly expressed in contract
  • nature = integral part of building
  • decided subjective intention wins out bc contract
  • blur lines with derivative acquisition