Access and Rights - Level 1, 2, 3 Flashcards
Name different ways that access to land is granted?
Licences, deed of easements and wayleave agreements
When would a licence agreement be used over a easement or wayleaves
When access requirements are temporary (e.g NR examples)
What is the difference between licence and lease
With a lease, tenant has sole occupation of the Property (exclusive possession), whereas, with a licence the landlord still is in occupation
Street v Montford 1985 - Street granted Mountford the right to occupy two rooms in his house, with exclusive possession, for a weekly rent and determinable on 14 days’ notice
Street had Mountford sign a declaration that the right to occupy constituted a licence and not a lease
Mountford sought a declaration that the agreement constituted a lease
Held that a lease exists only if exclusive possession is granted of ‘a dwelling’
Describe differences between a wayleave and an easement
Wayleave is temporary rights across land whereas an easement is permanent as registered on title (in perpetuity).
Easement is usually a one off payment, whereas a wayleave has yearly payments
Define a licence
a temporary agreement between two parties, (licensor and licensee) for activity such as rights of access. With a licence, the licensee does not have exclusive possession of the land, like with a lease.
Network Rail - Haslemere Cutting
In the Haslemere Cutting example, how did you determine that NR did not have any rights to access the land
I reviewed the title document to look for easements / rights for NR to enter the land (this is often the case on titles near to the railway). The works was not for emergency works for public safety so could not use s14 of the Railway Regulation Act 1842. It would be possible to use s71 of British Railway Act 1981 for surveys for suitability of construction works, however process takes 28 days and court proceedings. Cheaper and quicker to try to negotiate access with the landowner
Network Rail - Haslemere Cutting
What surveys were required on the land
Borehole surveys were to check the stability of the embankment and if required, install an intervention to prevent the embankment from collapsing (take 5 days)
Network Rail - Haslemere Cutting
What surveys were required on the land at haslemere cutting
Borehole surveys were to check the stability of the embankment and if required, install an intervention to prevent the embankment from collapsing (take 5 days for the surveys and then monitoring of boreholes over the 3 month period)
How do you register land for ownership
If a client came to me asking me to register land - would first measure the land which required ownership (using a trundel wheel). I would draw a red line boundary on a plan and add T marks to indicate who was required to maintain the boundary and then send it across to the solicitors to register the land ownership
NR - Haslemere Cutting
How did you initiate contact and organise surveys with council
Contacted the council and attended a site visit with their Tree and Woodland Officer as they were worried that the works would cause compaction to tree roots / soil. On site, we talked about the works, reinstatement of the gate which was required to be removed for the borehole equipment and borehole location. We agreed with the landowner that track matting would be used to reduce the impact to the ground below.
Haslemere Embankment
Did you pay a licence fee
A licence payment was paid - £500 for the surveys over the 3 month period. In line with maximum per week and reasonable as there was no other option in terms of the survey taking place (had to be in that location). Property and Estates fee of £200 was also paid (admin fee)
Define heads of terms
Head of Terms – document setting out the main terms of a commercial agreement between parties in a transaction
Orbit Homes Example
Describe the background on the job
Two residential development schemes at Bexley Heath, one by LB Bexley and another by Orbit Homes (75 units). The scheme owned by the council required access through the Orbit Site as otherwise landlocked – right of access (easement) required through the site to unlock development.
What information did you include in the HoTs
- Property Address
- Grantor / Grantee
- Consideration - (based on 50% of the uplift in value) (councils residual development value)
- Grantees/Grantors agents/solicitors
- The proposed access rights – right of way across Cheviot Close, permitted at all times, vehicles and pedestrians,
- Caveats – as Orbit homes developing their scheme adjacent, caveat was that the council would not be granted rights until completion of Orbit development
- Payments – LB Bexley were to pay costs of Orbits legal and professional fees (reasonable)
Orbit Homes Example
How did you assess the consideration payment for the access rights
I assessed the additional value which would be released by the acquisition of rights to LB Bexley. Orbit Homes, as the owner of the the ransom property, were to seek a proportion of the uplift in value from the acquisition of the rights (shared value basis)
What is ransom property
Ransom property can include rights or land; any legal interest which potentially increase the value of other land (usually by unlocking development value).
Describe case law for ransom property (uplift ranging 30-50%)
Stokes v Cambridge - There was a development parcel of land which required the purchase of an additional strip of land to provide access to the development site. The Lands Tribunal determined that the price for the ransom strip was one third of the increase in value of the subject development land attributable to acquisition of the ransom strip.
In Ozanne v Hertfordshire County Council (1988) the Lands Tribunal awarded 50% of the increase in value of the development value on the basis there was only one practical access.
How did you work out the uplift in value
Consideration payment was based on a residual land valuation of the LB Bexley development (undertaken by LB Bexley)
Existing use value was agreed as £30,000.
Residual land value was 1.4m (scheme 24 affordable units, 3 bed houses, 1 and 2 bedrooms).
To work out the consideration, I calculated the uplift in value from the acquisition of access rights = residual value minus exisiting use value
Consideration payment was based on case law, at 1/3 the uplift in value was the consideration, which was £450,000 (Stokes v Cambridge)
Proposed HoT to LB Bexley, couldnt agree on values with Orbit Homes