ACC 241 Test 2 Flashcards
Bilateral Contract
Promise for a Promise
Unilateral
Accept offer by performing
Express
In writing or at least expressed orally
Implied-in-fact Elements
1) Plaintiff offered goods or services
2) Did they expect to be paid (reasonably)
3) Defendant had opportunity to reject and did not
Valid Contract
Has all elements of contract
Voidable Contract
for some reason one/both parties can rescind
Void
Contract never existed (i.e. illegal) – Difference is in the remedy
Unenforceable contract
Has all elements of a contract but there is some defect (i.e. statute of frauds) – still a remedy and/or parties can perform
Quasi Contract
Must pay the value the service was worth (not with profit)… think unconscious
Requirements of Offers
Serious intent
Terms reasonably certain (meeting of minds)
Communicated to the offeree by the offeror
Types of Termination
Revocation (before accepted) Options Detrimental Reliance Rejection and Counteroffer By Operation of Law
What is an Option?
you give consideration to keep the contract offer open, at end of time you can decide not to do it
When is a contract terminated by operation of law?
Death of Offerror
Destruction of subject matter
Illegality
Lapse of time
Weird types of Acceptance
Conditional Acceptance (Counteroffer)
Silence
Mailbox Rule
When can silence be counted as an acceptance
course of dealing
“if you dont hear from me… assume”
Implied in fact contract
What is the mailbox rule?
An acceptance is effective as soon as its placed in the mail
Exceptions
Offer requires receipt (in contract)
Wrong address
Offeree rejects first, changes mind then sends acceptance (whatever one arrives first is valid)
Why is a gift promise not valid?
No consideration
Once a gift is given, is it revocable?
NO.
Difference between adequacy vs. sufficiency in consideration
Sufficiency – is there consideration?
Adequacy – is this a fair deal?
Do courts consider sufficiency, adequacy, or both in consideration?
Just sufficiency.
Adequacy only when unconsciounable
Things that look like consideration but are not
Pre-existing legal duty
Past Consideration
Illusory Promises
Not Consideration – Pre-existing legal duty
offering additional consideration for something I’m already under duty to do. Not fair.
EXCEPTION: unforeseen difficulties (hitting granite)
Not Consideration – Past Consideration
Performance happened first and then the promise.
i.e. Allen Iverson
Not consideration – Illusory Promises
Promising to give sleeves off of vest
Accord and Satisfaction
way to compromise/settle debt between parties
Accord – new offer to satisfy debt)
Satisfaction – Payment of the accord
Things needed for Promissory Estoppel
Made me a promise
I relied on it
It was reasonable to rely on it
I now have damages because I relied on it
Three parties that have questionable capacity
Minors
Mental Incompetence
Intoxication
When can a minor disaffirm?
ALWAYS when a minor
What is a minor liable for?
Must return subject matter in current condition
Negligence – no liability for damage
Triplet (gross negligence, recklessness, intentional) – they pay for damages