Academic Review Social Flashcards
What are the conflicts in Lewin’s field theory?
Conflicts in Lewin’s Field Theory are approach approach, avoidance avoidance, and approach avoidance.
What is Field Theory?
What is field theory?
Based on the work of Kurt Lewin, assumes behavior is result of interaction between person and environment. Conflicts occur when forces directing individual towards and away from goal are approximately equal.
What is the Zeigarnick effect?
The Zeigernick effect is the tendency to remember uncompleted tasks better than completed ones. The discovery grew out of research based on field theory. It has been found to vary with the amount of ego involvement associated with the task
In Lewin’s field theory, what happens as a person with an approach approach conflict moves toward one of the goals?
When a person with an approach approach conflict moves toward one of the goals, it becomes more attractive and the other goal becomes less attractive
What happens in the avoidance avoidance conflict when the person is unable to leave the field (avoid making a choice)?
If the person is unable to leave the field, the person will vacillate between the goals and then achieve equilibrium, the place where the forces pushing person away from each goal are equal.
Neal Miller investigated Lewin’s approach avoidance conflict using rats. What did he find?
Miller trained the rats to run to the food box and then gave them an electric shock as they were eating. On the next trial they ran to the goal more slowly and stopped short of the goal. The point where the rats stopped was the point where they reached the equilibrium between approach and avoidance
What is the overjustification hypothesis?
The overjustification hypothesis is the theory that if you reward someone for an activity they enjoy, it can undermine their interest in it. Based on distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. When rewarded for behav previously intrinsically motivated, behav becomesoverjustified or over rewarded. Intrinsic motivation loses power. Is predicted by self perception hypothesis: see selves doing behavior to get reward, conclude reason for behav was reward
What is Bem’s self perception theory?
Bem’s self perception theory holds that when internal cues are weak or difficult to interpret, we infer our own thoughts and feelings by observing our behavior and the situation in which it takes place
Fundamental attribution error
Underestimate impact of situations, overestimate impact of personal factors
Actor-observer effect
When explaining own behavior, tendency to overestimate impact of environment instead of self
Self serving bias
Attribute our successes to personal factors, failures to environment
Weiner’s theory of attribution and emotion
Focuses on how different types of attributions (internal/external, stable/unstable, controllable/uncontrollable) affect feelings towards ourselves and others
Belief in a just world
Tendency to blame victims of misfortune-need to believe we get what we deserve and deserve what we get
False consensus bias
Overestimate degree to which others conform to us in terms of their opinions, attributes, behavior
Central traits
Existence of certain trait dimensions (warm/cold) that, in our minds, are assoc. with many other characteristics
Primacy effect
Place greater emphasis on first impressions than on info learned later
Trait negativity bias
Weigh negative info more heavily than positive info in evaluating others
Confirmation bias
Seek, interpret, create info that verifies our beliefs
Self fulfilling prophecy
Our expectations about another person affect that person’s behavior
Authoritarian personality
Belief that Individuals with a specific personality type are more likely to be prejudiced
Social identity theory
Views prejudice as means of maintaining our self esteem through favoritism of ingroup, derogation of outgroup
Sherif’s Robber cave study
Illustrated that creation of superordinate (jointly shared) goals is one way to reduce intergroup hostility
Contact hypothesis
Under certain conditions, interpersonal contact between group members will reduce intergroup hostility
Describe Schacter and Singer’s epinephrine study
Some got epinephrine (strong emotional arousal). One group was told about effects of epi, second was not, third got placebo. Subjects put in room with confederates who acted euphoric or angry. Subjects not told about effects of epi adopted affect of confed. Schacter saw this as support for his two factor theory of emotion (person must experience physiological arousal and then interpret that arousal)