Absolutism Flashcards
1
Q
Define absolutism
A
an absolute form of moral rules which cannot be broken
2
Q
Define ethical naturalism
A
humans share a common human nature from which universal moral standards can be decided
3
Q
Kant’s view
A
- ethical naturalist
- believed that morality existed independently of religion and relied on reason alone to discover universal truth
- RATIONAL INTUITION
4
Q
Moore’s view
A
- created the idea of a ‘Naturalistic Fallacy’ = just because there is a common occurrence of something does not mean that it is right
=> rejects ethical naturalism as it depends on the observation of human nature
5
Q
List 3 weaknesses with absolutism
A
- uncompromising adherence to rules can become oppressive and unsympathetic (abortion in relation to rape)
- given human error, every system would have room for a ‘second chance’
- can lead to legalism = adherence to letter but not spirit of law - ‘Sermon on the Mount’ : Jesus condemns the hypocrisy of legalism
6
Q
Moore’s intuitionism
A
- his attempt to make ethical language meaningful whilst avoiding the naturalistic fallacy
- “Good” is simple as we should all know intuitively what good is a priori (Plato)
- we do not need a prescription to tell us what is good in the world
7
Q
H.A Prichard’s intuitionism
A
- we intuitively know what we ought to do when you use your reason; it is a combination of the two
- yet some people have developed their moral thinking more than others => lacks universalisability
8
Q
Define intuitionism
A
there are object moral truths independent of human beings and we use our mind in an intuitive way
9
Q
Generic criticisms of intuitionism
A
- you could justify any action
- intuitions are from social conditioning
- intuitionism aims to be cognitive, but ethics are different for everyone if they are apart of our intuitions => subjective
- ultimately it lacks the foundation and allows any behaviour
- hard to differentiate between I believe good is x, and good is x => does it all collapse into our preference?
10
Q
Philippa Foot’s view
A
- our intuitions could be wrong
- questions whether we are ethically colour blind (some see yellow, those who are colour blind see grey, the same can apply to ethics)
- does it eventually collapse into our preference?