ABA Model Rules - Rule 1 Questions Flashcards
What does Rule 1.1 govern?
Rule 1.1 governs the competence of a lawyer.
Rule 1.1: What factors are evaluated when determining the competence of a lawyer?
(1) the relative complexity and specialized nature of the matter
(2) the lawyer’s general experience
(3) the lawyer’s training and experience in the field in question
(4) the preparation and study the lawyer is able to give the matter
(5) whether it is feasible to refer the matter to, or associate or consult with, a lawyer of established competence in the field in question.
Comment [1]
Rule 1.1: What is the required proficiency to be deemed competent?
“In many instances, the required proficiency is that of a general practitioner.”
Comment [1]
Rule 1.1: Is the level of competence required always that of a general practitioner?
No. “Expertise in a particular field of law may be required in some circumstance.”
Comment [1]
Rule 1.1: Does a lawyer need special training or prior experience to handle legal problems of a type with which they are unfamiliar?
No. “A lawyer can provide adequate representation in a wholly novel field through necessary study.”
Comment [2]
Rule 1.1: When may lawyers give advice or assistance in an area they normally lack the skill required to help in?
“In an emergency, a lawyer may give advice or assistance in a matter in which the lawyer does not have the skill ordinarily required where referral to or consultation or association with another lawyer would be impractical. Even in an emergency, however, assistance should be limited to that reasonably necessary in the circumstances, for ill-considered action under emergency conditions can jeopardize the client’s interest.”
Comment [3]
Rule 1.1: What is required for competent handling?
“Competent handling of a particular matter includes inquiry into and analysis of the factual and legal elements of the problem, and use of methods and procedures meeting the standards of competent practitioners. It also includes adequate preparation. The required attention and preparation are determined in part by what is at stake; major litigation and complex transactions ordinarily require more extensive treatment than matters of lesser complexity and consequence.”
Comment [5]
Rule 1.2: What is governed by Rule 1.2?
The scope of representation and allocation of authority between lawyer and client.
Rule 1.2: Who determines the goals of the representation?
The client determines the goals of the representation.
Rule 1.2: Who determines the means of the representation?
The lawyer normally has control of the legal and tactical matters of the representation.
Rule 1.2: Can the client authorize their lawyer to take specific action on their behalf?
Yes.
Comment [3]
Rule 1.2: Does representing a client constitute approval of the client’s views or activities?
No.
Comment [5]
Rule 1.2: May a lawyer present an analysis of legal aspects of questionable conduct?
Yes, but they may not recommend the means by which a crime or fraud might be committed with impunity.
AKA they can tell their client that they will likely get X amount of years if convicted of Y, but they can not recommend that a client take a different course of (illegal) action.
Comment [9]
Rule 1.2: What if a client’s course of action becomes fraudulent during the course of the representation?
“[A] lawyer may not continue assisting a client in conduct that the lawyer originally supposed was legally proper but then discovers is criminal or fraudulent. The lawyer must, therefore, withdraw from the representation of the client in the matter.”
Comment [10]
What does Rule 1.3 govern?
Rule 1.3 governs the degree of diligence and promptness that the lawyer is expected to work within.